Council by-elections: what’s been going on?

Over the last six weeks there have been twenty council by-elections in the key Westminster constituencies* for the next general election. Looking at these twenty results provides a much more useful story of what is happening in the areas which really matter to each party than overall council by-election results.

What story do they tell?

Good news for the Liberal Democrats in the Lib Dem – Tory battleground seats: an average swing of 7.1% swing from Tory to Lib Dem with a net gain of one for the Lib Dems in the four contests.

Good news for the Liberal Democrats in the Lib Dem – Labour battleground seats: an average swing of 4.7% from Labour to Lib Dem in the two contests.

Bad news for the Conservatives in the Conservative – Labour battleground seats: an average swing of 1.3% from Conservative to Labour in the fourteen contests. In only one of these seats did the Conservatives make a gain (Pembrokeshire), but that was from the Lib Dems and cancelled out by a Lib Dem gain from them in Rossendale.

Of course, council by-election results are just that, but then opinion polls (especially those from [insert least favoured polling company of your choice here]) are only opinion polls, Parliamentary by-elections are only Parliamentary by-elections etc etc.

* The top 150 Conservative targets, top 150 Liberal Democrat targets and top 50 Labour targets based on straight swing to win on the notional results for new constituencies taken from Rallings and Thrasher.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/1406 for Twitter and emails.

7 Comments

  • “Lib Dem – Labour battleground seats: an average swing of 4.7% from Labour to Lib Dem in the two contests”

    One was in Brent Central, where was the second contest?

  • Geoffrey Payne 29th Sep '07 - 3:29pm

    I don’t see the point in discussing the implications of a few local by-elections. If there is an upsurge in Lib Dem support, there has to be a reason for it, and currently there is none. The Lib Dems need to think of reasons why the electorate should vote for us, and that is what we should be discussing here.

  • “I believe that was the Crystal Palace by-election in Lewisham West & Penge.”

    Thanks Will Howells. Now that you mention it, I recall it…there was another one in Lewisham too (Lewisham East constituency but Lewisham East may not be in the top 150 LD targets)

  • Geoffrey Payne 30th Sep '07 - 7:24am

    As Lib Dems we dislike the centralising tendencies and the hostility towards civil liberties of New Labour, but we also dislike the anti-Europeanism and the lack of committment towards redistribution of wealth and the mixed messages on Green matters of the Tories.
    Historically the reflexive dislike of the Lib Dems towards the Tories is our memory of Thatcherism, and which even today still has a malign influence on the party.
    I want the Lib Dems to win seats from both parties and going into coalition with either party is a very unattractive proposition. Of course the arithmetic may force us to consider it, in which case the deal breaker has to be a committment to proportional representation, and a recognition that global warming is the most important issue facing the planet today and that radical policies need to tackle it.
    This I suggest is what we should be debating rather than a few local by-elections.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Do you agree to the T&Cs?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 18th May - 5:24pm
    Roland, Firstly, before we had council tax and its predecessor the community charge - we had rates . Relief was always available for lower income...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 18th May - 5:02pm
    Apologies, I forgot to unbold the text after "all 30 farm subsidies" in my second sentence... Didn't mean to shout!
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 18th May - 5:01pm
    Indeed, Dan. When New Zealand's Labour government took the momentous decision in 1984 to abolish all 30 farm subsidies and export incentives there was a...
  • User AvatarCogload 18th May - 3:42pm
    Abolish it - job done. Or leave it to member states to decide on what Farming policy they should have. If any.
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 18th May - 2:55pm
    Therre seem to be only two soutions for Greece, one bad and one worse - a euro exit and devaluation or potentialy decades of stagnation...