Daily Mail website ‘editing users’ comments’

Yesterday, former BBC Man Martin Belam wrote about the Daily Mail’s distortion of an NSPCC report.  Having then commented on the story on their website, he got quite a shock:

This is what they published:

If you actually read the report ChildLine issued, it does not say that suicidal five year olds called ChildLine. It says that there were 42 phone calls by children between the ages of 5 AND 11. The other 96% of suicidal calls were by children 12 and over – which whilst it is still very sad.
- Martin Belam, Salzburg, Austria

Sadly, I appear to trail off mid-sentence. What I actually submitted was:

The other 96% of suicidal calls were by children 12 and over – which whilst it is still very sad is nowhere near the picture of suicidal 5 year olds portrayed in this article.

For some reason, the last part of my sentence, criticising the Daily Mail’s reporting, didn’t make it through the pre-moderation of comments on the site.

More.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/552 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

  • To be honest, I’m surprised they printed the first bit.

    Comments on the Daily Mail website have to toe the Mail’s line and anything that doesn’t will usually fail to appear, for some mysterious reason.

    The ironic thing is that this would be very close to the way in which a website would be run in Stalin’s Russia.

  • This isn’t an uncommon occurrence. You have to carefully craft your posting to the Daily Mail (running the near-certain risk that they will not appear) and on at least 3 occasions I have had my comments ‘edited’ in a similar manner, giving my posting an entirely different meaning. For example, my posting to a ‘mad Mel’ Phillips column, in which she berated the security forces for not arresting terrorists before they committed terrorist acts was published as

    “I, like Melanie, cannot believe that the security services couldn’t have arrested these criminals beforehand.

    - Andrew, Olney, UK”

    What my actual (rather sarcastic) comment was

    “I, like Melanie, cannot believe that the security services couldn’t have arrested these criminals beforehand. I mean, it’s not like they blend in with society. They don’t work in schools and hospitals. You would think that men walking about with eye-patches, ‘I love Osama Bin Laden’ t-shirts and ‘I am a bomber’ tattooed on their foreheads would cause suspicion at least.

    Andrew, Olney, UK”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 31st Jul - 3:00am
    In fact, I'm resigning my support from the Lib Dems until people like Caron stop making so many attacks on men and then people like...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 31st Jul - 2:24am
    Andy, why don't you speak to me as a human being instead of trying to make fun of me? I don't want to get into...
  • User AvatarColin 31st Jul - 1:55am
    The only reason why I and my partner has any kind of prospects is because my partner’s parents bought the house we live in under...
  • User AvatarAndy Hinton 31st Jul - 1:46am
    Wow, the capacity of commenters on LDV to make me sympathise with the OP when I didn't especially in the first place is astonishing. I...
  • User AvatarA Social Liberal 31st Jul - 1:38am
    Just so you are under no misapprehension about exactly what Hamas is doing - take a look at the photograph at the beginning of this...
  • User AvatarT-J 31st Jul - 1:19am
    @Peter 'I notice that although you scorn my opinion, you do not offer an alternative. The >75% is a current estimate, reasonable in my opinion,...