Daily Mail website ‘editing users’ comments’

Yesterday, former BBC Man Martin Belam wrote about the Daily Mail’s distortion of an NSPCC report.  Having then commented on the story on their website, he got quite a shock:

This is what they published:

If you actually read the report ChildLine issued, it does not say that suicidal five year olds called ChildLine. It says that there were 42 phone calls by children between the ages of 5 AND 11. The other 96% of suicidal calls were by children 12 and over – which whilst it is still very sad.
- Martin Belam, Salzburg, Austria

Sadly, I appear to trail off mid-sentence. What I actually submitted was:

The other 96% of suicidal calls were by children 12 and over – which whilst it is still very sad is nowhere near the picture of suicidal 5 year olds portrayed in this article.

For some reason, the last part of my sentence, criticising the Daily Mail’s reporting, didn’t make it through the pre-moderation of comments on the site.

More.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/552 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

  • To be honest, I’m surprised they printed the first bit.

    Comments on the Daily Mail website have to toe the Mail’s line and anything that doesn’t will usually fail to appear, for some mysterious reason.

    The ironic thing is that this would be very close to the way in which a website would be run in Stalin’s Russia.

  • This isn’t an uncommon occurrence. You have to carefully craft your posting to the Daily Mail (running the near-certain risk that they will not appear) and on at least 3 occasions I have had my comments ‘edited’ in a similar manner, giving my posting an entirely different meaning. For example, my posting to a ‘mad Mel’ Phillips column, in which she berated the security forces for not arresting terrorists before they committed terrorist acts was published as

    “I, like Melanie, cannot believe that the security services couldn’t have arrested these criminals beforehand.

    - Andrew, Olney, UK”

    What my actual (rather sarcastic) comment was

    “I, like Melanie, cannot believe that the security services couldn’t have arrested these criminals beforehand. I mean, it’s not like they blend in with society. They don’t work in schools and hospitals. You would think that men walking about with eye-patches, ‘I love Osama Bin Laden’ t-shirts and ‘I am a bomber’ tattooed on their foreheads would cause suspicion at least.

    Andrew, Olney, UK”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTony Rowan-Wicks 16th Apr - 4:38pm
    I cannot believe that this country has the sort of people in parliament who could achieve what is being suggested by Mathew. The suggestion could...
  • User AvatarMartin 16th Apr - 4:35pm
    Amalric: an interesting discourse and your reference to 'On Liberty' has me wondering about the extent to which Liberalism is constitutionalist-utilitarian or more concerned with...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 16th Apr - 4:31pm
    Please delete my first post (which came out garbled) and read the second one above! Thanks.
  • User AvatarChris Manners 16th Apr - 4:30pm
    Simon Shaw, Apol, hadn't seen your comments about Lib Dems post-2015.
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 16th Apr - 4:30pm
    "As Nick has pointed out, 'I would never have dreamed of saying the things that I said about Cyril Smith on his 80th birthday and...
  • User Avatarmatt 16th Apr - 4:29pm
    @ Martin "As I understand it those on benefit can have mortgage interest as part of their assistance. Presumably similar can happen too, but again...