** Government to extend Parliament protest zone

During the Second Reading of Baroness (Sue) Miller’s Public Demonstrations (Repeals) Bill, the minister announced that instead of supporting her Bill, the Government would instead soon be announcing other locations where they intend to curtail the right to protest.

Commenting, Baroness Miller said:

“The Government talked about Britishness yesterday, but today showed a blatant lack of concern about their mutilation of one of the most cherished British traditions: freedom of expression.

“In fact the Government appears determined to extend its draconian policies into other parts of the country.”

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarpaul barker 25th Aug - 2:09pm
    @ Lyn Newman. At the moment neither of your first two choices actually exists. The Libdem Recovery is still in its very early stages, if...
  • User Avatarpetermartin2001 25th Aug - 2:06pm
    Bill, We should be targetting that the economy runs close to full capacity. This may or may not happen if NGDP, which is a mixture...
  • User AvatarGlenn 25th Aug - 2:06pm
    Sue; The accusation of Psychopathy usually comes with judgements about the extent to which someone displays emotional intelligence. When it does exist as a reality...
  • User AvatarRobert Pinsker 25th Aug - 1:54pm
    I think we, and perhaps most people, would agree that allowing constitutional changes with massive and wide-ranging practical implications to be made on a wafer-thin...
  • User AvatarNom de Plume 25th Aug - 1:52pm
    Having read a bit more, I modify my previous statement. Libya was a NATO failure, with only Germany calling it correctly. UNSC resolution 1973 was...
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 25th Aug - 1:52pm
    Sue Sutherland 25th Aug '16 - 1:15pm "Have I misread Andrew George’s comment about the contributors to this discussion? I find his words very dismissive...