Jo Swinson’s expenses: why you should write an email today

I’ve been very gratified by the entirely positive feedback my articles about the Daily Telegraph and Jo Swinson yesterday have received.  This is entirely in keeping with the broadly sympathetic reaction Jo has received on both the blogosphere and on Twitter.

That the story has had such a positive backlash is of course a good thing.  The trouble with such stories however is that they often grow in the retelling.  I’ve already cited how the BBC and Guardian have contributed to this.  What if a candidate opposing Jo in the general election campaign were to base a dirty tricks campaign on this story? What happens the next time a newspaper decides to do a profile on her and a time pressured researcher finds the story via a quick Google search?

As Mark Pack wrote last year:

…internet search engines are changing the dynamic of negative stories. Whilst in the past the correct response was often to either say nothing or say very little and wait for a story to blow over, the big risk in the internet era is that as a result only one side of the story is laid out there waiting for search engines to find when people research the person or the topic in future years.

In short, we cannot afford to let this stand.  That’s why I am encouraging people to write directly to the Telegraph, the BBC and the Guardian and demand a retraction and apology. (There are other media outlets which have repeated and embellished the original Telegraph piece but the original source and more reputable outlets are a good place to start).

So far, the response has been tremendous, but we need as many people as possible to do this so they cannot afford to ignore the issue.

Finally, a (non-exhaustive) list of blogs which have already commented on this:

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Rob Parsons 24th May '09 - 9:27pm

    I’ve done all three letters, and commented on my blog – http://acomfortableplace.blogspot.com/2009/05/nadine-dorries.html – Never thought I’d mention Dorries and Swinson in the same breath.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDJ 17th Jan - 11:32pm
    My initial thoughts are that May is saying, as have others in the months following, that because the Remain campaign told voters that Leave would...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 17th Jan - 11:25pm
    "he joked that many of us in the audience probably did things that might not be missed by the public if we went on strike"...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 17th Jan - 10:55pm
    Eddie When you sit down at your keyboard , do another thing, go to the party site , and join us ! Whether I agree...
  • User AvatarAllan Brame 17th Jan - 10:52pm
    There is no question that we should oppose a Tory Brexit. The coalition showed us the damage we suffer when being seen as supporting the...
  • User Avatarmalc 17th Jan - 10:51pm
    Nom de Plume @malc "That was before May made her speech." A Sky poll carried out after the PM's speech: 51% of those surveyed said...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 17th Jan - 10:45pm
    Ashcroft's focus groups wanted the best of both worlds, albeit difficult to deliver as he said.