Jo Swinson’s expenses: why you should write an email today

I’ve been very gratified by the entirely positive feedback my articles about the Daily Telegraph and Jo Swinson yesterday have received.  This is entirely in keeping with the broadly sympathetic reaction Jo has received on both the blogosphere and on Twitter.

That the story has had such a positive backlash is of course a good thing.  The trouble with such stories however is that they often grow in the retelling.  I’ve already cited how the BBC and Guardian have contributed to this.  What if a candidate opposing Jo in the general election campaign were to base a dirty tricks campaign on this story? What happens the next time a newspaper decides to do a profile on her and a time pressured researcher finds the story via a quick Google search?

As Mark Pack wrote last year:

…internet search engines are changing the dynamic of negative stories. Whilst in the past the correct response was often to either say nothing or say very little and wait for a story to blow over, the big risk in the internet era is that as a result only one side of the story is laid out there waiting for search engines to find when people research the person or the topic in future years.

In short, we cannot afford to let this stand.  That’s why I am encouraging people to write directly to the Telegraph, the BBC and the Guardian and demand a retraction and apology. (There are other media outlets which have repeated and embellished the original Telegraph piece but the original source and more reputable outlets are a good place to start).

So far, the response has been tremendous, but we need as many people as possible to do this so they cannot afford to ignore the issue.

Finally, a (non-exhaustive) list of blogs which have already commented on this:

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Rob Parsons 24th May '09 - 9:27pm

    I’ve done all three letters, and commented on my blog – – Never thought I’d mention Dorries and Swinson in the same breath.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 26th Oct - 10:17am
    May 2015 should read May 2015. :(
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 26th Oct - 10:16am
    David, Neither the Sarah Olney twitter feed nor the Richmond Lib Dems website are behaving like there is a by-election on with a candidate in...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 26th Oct - 10:08am
    Lib Dems have a candidate in place in Richmond for a snap general election, who I understand has only been a member since May 2105....
  • User Avatarexpats 26th Oct - 10:06am
    In my experience those that talk most about 'Patriotism' are those who go to extreme lengths to avoid their 'moral' tax burden and pay instead...
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 26th Oct - 10:05am
    I hope the campaign will not focus on personal attacks on Zac Goldsmith. I would prefer to see a positive campaign, focusing on putting across...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 26th Oct - 10:03am
    I think we have every prospect of significantly reducing Goldsmith's majority. Those who expect more than that need to get real.