Jo Swinson’s expenses: why you should write an email today

I’ve been very gratified by the entirely positive feedback my articles about the Daily Telegraph and Jo Swinson yesterday have received.  This is entirely in keeping with the broadly sympathetic reaction Jo has received on both the blogosphere and on Twitter.

That the story has had such a positive backlash is of course a good thing.  The trouble with such stories however is that they often grow in the retelling.  I’ve already cited how the BBC and Guardian have contributed to this.  What if a candidate opposing Jo in the general election campaign were to base a dirty tricks campaign on this story? What happens the next time a newspaper decides to do a profile on her and a time pressured researcher finds the story via a quick Google search?

As Mark Pack wrote last year:

…internet search engines are changing the dynamic of negative stories. Whilst in the past the correct response was often to either say nothing or say very little and wait for a story to blow over, the big risk in the internet era is that as a result only one side of the story is laid out there waiting for search engines to find when people research the person or the topic in future years.

In short, we cannot afford to let this stand.  That’s why I am encouraging people to write directly to the Telegraph, the BBC and the Guardian and demand a retraction and apology. (There are other media outlets which have repeated and embellished the original Telegraph piece but the original source and more reputable outlets are a good place to start).

So far, the response has been tremendous, but we need as many people as possible to do this so they cannot afford to ignore the issue.

Finally, a (non-exhaustive) list of blogs which have already commented on this:

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Rob Parsons 24th May '09 - 9:27pm

    I’ve done all three letters, and commented on my blog – http://acomfortableplace.blogspot.com/2009/05/nadine-dorries.html – Never thought I’d mention Dorries and Swinson in the same breath.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Newman 23rd Jun - 7:51pm
    I think Catherine might remember me shouting at some Daily Telegraph journalistrat a Brexit debate she attened in Lewes . I went on to join...
  • User AvatarAndy Cooke 23rd Jun - 7:43pm
    Bill le Breton and George Kendall - you've spiked my next article before I even wrote it. What you've just written was exactly what I...
  • User AvatarPeter Brand 23rd Jun - 7:28pm
    One separate point. Tim campaigned on 'no deals, no coalitions'. This means we must not consider a deal now. We can only change this policy,...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 23rd Jun - 7:24pm
    @David Allen "Actually, we had more than that on the fella. We had the IFS saying that his economic plans wouldn’t work and that manic...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 23rd Jun - 7:19pm
    I'm not sure Charles Kennedy had a long term history of supporting this country's enemies, though. Incidentally, you do accept that a chunk of those...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 23rd Jun - 7:19pm
    Thanks for this. Two points: 1. Free movement should remain open for the self-employed, employed, retired and spouses. I don't mind if there are some...
Sat 1st Jul 2017