Jo Swinson’s expenses: why you should write an email today

I’ve been very gratified by the entirely positive feedback my articles about the Daily Telegraph and Jo Swinson yesterday have received.  This is entirely in keeping with the broadly sympathetic reaction Jo has received on both the blogosphere and on Twitter.

That the story has had such a positive backlash is of course a good thing.  The trouble with such stories however is that they often grow in the retelling.  I’ve already cited how the BBC and Guardian have contributed to this.  What if a candidate opposing Jo in the general election campaign were to base a dirty tricks campaign on this story? What happens the next time a newspaper decides to do a profile on her and a time pressured researcher finds the story via a quick Google search?

As Mark Pack wrote last year:

…internet search engines are changing the dynamic of negative stories. Whilst in the past the correct response was often to either say nothing or say very little and wait for a story to blow over, the big risk in the internet era is that as a result only one side of the story is laid out there waiting for search engines to find when people research the person or the topic in future years.

In short, we cannot afford to let this stand.  That’s why I am encouraging people to write directly to the Telegraph, the BBC and the Guardian and demand a retraction and apology. (There are other media outlets which have repeated and embellished the original Telegraph piece but the original source and more reputable outlets are a good place to start).

So far, the response has been tremendous, but we need as many people as possible to do this so they cannot afford to ignore the issue.

Finally, a (non-exhaustive) list of blogs which have already commented on this:

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Rob Parsons 24th May '09 - 9:27pm

    I’ve done all three letters, and commented on my blog – http://acomfortableplace.blogspot.com/2009/05/nadine-dorries.html – Never thought I’d mention Dorries and Swinson in the same breath.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 11th Dec - 11:59am
    The Andrew Marr Show on 11/12/16 is worth a look. We wish him a speedy recovery. He was replaced for one week by Nick Robinson...
  • User AvatarPeter Andrews 11th Dec - 11:54am
    Oh and by the way I speak as someone who is due to go to court as a victim of a burglary where two burglars...
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 11th Dec - 11:53am
    One of the potential political hazards of economic decline as a result of Brexit is that instead of blaming the Brexiteers and the Tory government,...
  • User AvatarPeter Andrews 11th Dec - 11:50am
    I actually totally agree that ex-prisoners should not have to disclose their convictions on all job applications. Making them do so is a sure fire...
  • User AvatarLeekliberal 11th Dec - 11:46am
    As one of the 48%, another benefit of a 2nd referendum when the terms of any brexit deal are clear, is that if we vote...
  • User AvatarDJ 11th Dec - 11:41am
    Whatever the horrors and limitations of Cuba under Fidel Castro, I do not think they are best represented by a boxer having to stay amateur....