Lib Dem response to Labour’s letter to broadcasters

Nick Robinson has reported:

I’m told that Labour has asked the two other big parties to sign a joint letter to broadcasters criticising them for covering the debates and the polls too much and claiming that the news bulletins had “failed to deliver the usual specialist examination of specific policy areas”. The Lib Dems and the Tories have refused to sign. The BBC has yet to receive the letter.

Here’s the party’s official response to the request from Labour:

We have discussed your proposal, however, we do not think that it is appropriate for political parties to seek to dictate the nature of political coverage to broadcasters. We are pleased that because we have set out our policy priorities clearly in our manifesto and included detailed costings, broadcasters and others have been able to analyse our policy and subject it to proper scrutiny and discussion. It might assist coverage if other parties followed suit. We would of course welcome further focus on policy given our clear message, focused priorities and detailed costings.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 25th Apr '10 - 7:51pm

    So basically Labour are unhappy because their debate and poll performance is bad, and they would prefer the media to concentrate on some unspecified area in which they are strong.

    I wonder what area they think that is.

  • oh snap!

    (the above comment is deemed too short by LDV so I have added this comment below).

  • Stewart Kirk 26th Apr '10 - 11:48pm

    Whatever you may think it would surely be better for our democracy for elections to be fought on policy rather than personaility. However, I fear the dumbing down of our public life sinply relects the superficial celebrity culture that pervades all aspects of modern Britain, so, perhaps, Labour were pushing water uphill hoping for anything better from the other parties.

    I recall rarely agreeing with you at York University in 1988, Mark, and still find we have diverging views. Thought you looked good on the box today though.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKevin colwill 24th Jun - 10:58pm
    As I understand it the ball is now in the UK's court to make proposals for a new relationship with the EU. Why doesn't a...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 24th Jun - 10:54pm
    What I don't want to see is the Tories and Labour coming to an arrangement between themselves about Britain's negotiating position with the EU and...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 24th Jun - 10:51pm
    EEA membership on the Norway / Iceland model would mean free movement of goods, services, capital and of labour but with exemptions for agriculture and...
  • User Avatarcrewegwyn 24th Jun - 9:53pm
    So does Plan B still allow free movement of labour into the UK?
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 24th Jun - 9:42pm
    Plan B, just hope it works Bill. Where we are today, not yesterday, I agree with you. I also agree it was a diabolical campaign....
  • User AvatarJane Ann Liston 24th Jun - 9:35pm
    @Tony Lloyd '… could one solution be to unify Northern Ireland not with Eire but with Scotland?' That makes sense geologically but I'm not sure...