Lib Dem response to Labour’s letter to broadcasters

Nick Robinson has reported:

I’m told that Labour has asked the two other big parties to sign a joint letter to broadcasters criticising them for covering the debates and the polls too much and claiming that the news bulletins had “failed to deliver the usual specialist examination of specific policy areas”. The Lib Dems and the Tories have refused to sign. The BBC has yet to receive the letter.

Here’s the party’s official response to the request from Labour:

We have discussed your proposal, however, we do not think that it is appropriate for political parties to seek to dictate the nature of political coverage to broadcasters. We are pleased that because we have set out our policy priorities clearly in our manifesto and included detailed costings, broadcasters and others have been able to analyse our policy and subject it to proper scrutiny and discussion. It might assist coverage if other parties followed suit. We would of course welcome further focus on policy given our clear message, focused priorities and detailed costings.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 25th Apr '10 - 7:51pm

    So basically Labour are unhappy because their debate and poll performance is bad, and they would prefer the media to concentrate on some unspecified area in which they are strong.

    I wonder what area they think that is.

  • oh snap!

    (the above comment is deemed too short by LDV so I have added this comment below).

  • Stewart Kirk 26th Apr '10 - 11:48pm

    Whatever you may think it would surely be better for our democracy for elections to be fought on policy rather than personaility. However, I fear the dumbing down of our public life sinply relects the superficial celebrity culture that pervades all aspects of modern Britain, so, perhaps, Labour were pushing water uphill hoping for anything better from the other parties.

    I recall rarely agreeing with you at York University in 1988, Mark, and still find we have diverging views. Thought you looked good on the box today though.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 28th Mar - 10:58am
    The problem with the Liberal Democrats' position on defence is that since Lord Garden's untimely death in 2007, we have not had any senior politician...
  • User AvatarLyn 28th Mar - 10:57am
    Actually, I'm not sure that I would mind giving up my UK citizenship for a EU citizenship if a separate EU citizenship existed. In fact,...
  • User AvatarRob Parsons 28th Mar - 10:46am
    I very much like the implication that Jeremy Corbyn was designed not to be used.
  • User Avatarfrankie 28th Mar - 10:22am
    @David Evans I was in deep moderation David. I upset people by screaming "Your making a terrible mistake". I must admit after awhile of screaming...
  • User AvatarCassieB 28th Mar - 10:05am
    ethics gradient: that is interesting, having never played the game. Though I suspect May and co have 2 of hearts, 6 of clubs, and a...
  • User AvatarLester Holloway 28th Mar - 9:39am
    Mark, Surely getting to the point of being in a coalition involves having a plan for upliftment of people in the nations of Africa? As...