LibLink: Charlotte Henry – How can the Liberal Democrats cure its ‘woman problem’?

Over at the Telegraph, Lib Dem blogger and former London Assembly candidate Charlotte Henry takes a look at the Lib Dems’ ‘woman problem’ in the light of the recent publicity concerning allegations against Portsmouth South MP Mike Hancock and former party chief executive Lord (Chris) Rennard. Here’s an excerpt:

The Lib Dems need to get more women elected at every single level, of that there is no doubt. It is galling to still walk into party meetings with barely any women, or to still see male dominated panels at party conference. … All that said, it should be noted that the party leader in Wales is female, as is Caroline Pidgeon AM, who led the party’s London list last year. Furthermore, women occupy a huge number of powerful positions around Nick Clegg. It’s also worth pointing out that Liberal Youth, the party’s youth and student wing, have just elected two highly talented young women to be its chair and vice chair, both beating male candidates.

Friends and colleagues of mine have felt let down by our party when making the most serious of allegations. However, many of those issues stem from personal loyalty and poor organisational structures, not a desire for a libertarian free-for-all as has been implied. A thorough investigation into what was going on in the Liberal Democrats needs to happen, with recommendations made and more importantly, followed, so that that issues like this never arise again, and women feel safe in the party. That doesn’t mean the party has to stop being liberal though.

You can read Charlotte’s piece in full here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34848 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Eddie Sammon 9th Jun '13 - 7:07pm

    I think the main problem is the wealth inequality between men and women.

    So how do we change it? First of all I do not accept the argument that men like to hire other men just because they are men – men like women!

    Rather, I think the solution is to improve maternity support for businesses. This will require a lot of cash, which some might not like but it is the only solution.

    Quotas are Owellian – once you introduce quotas to resolve one inequality we could then introduce them for race, class, geography, profession – it is just a non starter.

    I am sure others who are a lot more informed in this area will have many other ideas that could help, I would just like to say I think the cause and the solution boils down to cold hard cash.

  • “It’s also worth pointing out that Liberal Youth, the party’s youth and student wing, have just elected two highly talented young women to be its chair and vice chair, both beating male candidates.”

    Not sure what this shows. The former LDYS had 4 female Chairs in 6 years – then didn’t elect another female chair for a decade.

  • What is the problem with female representation? I can’t see why we should be having a problem with it, yet we are. I think we should consider something like fast-tracking talented women, because it is important that political parties reflect the populations they seek to serve.

  • There are almost no Liberal Democrat safe seats. Each seat has to be hard fought with a sustained campaign over many years. Whether this is led by a man or a woman is secondary. It certainly would not work to parachute candidates into constituencies where there are individuals who have carved out an identity that carries local votes.

    Is there a problem in getting strong female local campaigners who are prepared to be active over many years? If not there should not be a problem;, unless these hard working activists are not sufficiently recognised.

  • Eddie Sammon 10th Jun '13 - 5:27pm

    Martin makes a very good point stating that local candidates who have worked hard to build a presence should get priority for standing as the member of parliament, rather than parachuting in a woman.

    Besides looking at the financial barriers to entry for women in politics, I think beginning the withdrawal of all taxpayer funds from religious organisations, including faith schools, could also help. Our free school policy is not helping this.

  • The major problem is the culture of campaigning, to be a parliamentary candidate for our party you need to literally safe your life to it, body and soul; generally speaking, the only group with the time, money and insane personality required to do this (at least, on mass) are white middle class males. Thus, this group is disproportionately represented in our parliamentary group.

  • Matthew Huntbach 11th Jun '13 - 11:59am

    Eddie Sammon

    I think beginning the withdrawal of all taxpayer funds from religious organisations, including faith schools, could also help.

    Perhaps you could explain how this links to the subject under discussion here, because I have tried to think of how this comment might be relevant to it, but it has defeated me.

  • Eddie Sammon 11th Jun '13 - 5:17pm

    Matthew, I just think many religions portray women as less suitable for power than men. I am not a militant atheist, as you will remember I am very tolerant to religious objections for gay marriage, but I just think religion should be privately funded.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBill le Breton 21st Dec - 8:29pm
    Tony, the main players in this, Laws, Alexander and Clegg do understand the different ways of defining the deficit, and when some of them and...
  • User AvatarMark S 21st Dec - 8:18pm
    @Richard Dean Retrain to do what though? Some estimates claim that upto 45% of workers will lose their jobs to automation in the next 20...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 21st Dec - 8:13pm
    I know three people who have switched to e-cigs from being heavy smokers. None still smoke. Small sample but 100% success. I am one if...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 21st Dec - 8:01pm
    Thanks Sue S - Dec 20th 5.57pm. I was beginning to think that no one apart from Andrew Ducker had bothered to look at a...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 21st Dec - 7:41pm
    No-one understands the difference between the deficit and the structural deficit (or indeed the cyclical deficit if anyone considers that any more) and as far...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 21st Dec - 7:32pm
    @hireton: there is flexibilty to vary the housing elements of Universal Credit and to create other benefits which will then be added to the benefit...