LibLink…Tavish Scott: Courting election woe with party first

Nobody ever goes near a court without there being severe stress involved. Whether it’s for a criminal matter, because you’re in debt or going through a horrendous family situation, being able to access the justice system easily is critical. The SNP Government in Scotland seeks to centralise court proceedings, meaning long journeys and increased pressure on already over capacity city courts. Last week a Holyrood committee, with a majority of SNP MSPs, backed the Government’s approach. What was striking was that they all spoke up for their own local facilities before voting to close them.

Tavish Scott used his Scotsman column this week to take these MSPs to task. Tavish is no stranger to acting on principle to stand up for his constituents. He resigned as Deputy Minister for Parliament in 2001 when he could not agree with measures taken on fisheries by the Scottish Executive.

If those SNP MSPs had done the same thing and voted to save their local courts, what would have happened to them? The Government’s overall majority is on a knife edge already, so they would have got little more than a hard stare from the Chief Whip.

Tavish writes in the Scotsman that putting party unity first in the hope of achieving independence in the referendum next year won’t do them much good in the long run.

The big picture still points to 18 September, 2014. The independence referendum provides a laser-like focus for Nationalists. Nothing is allowed to get in the way of the objective that remains the only factor that unites all SNP members.

Divided parties do not look good as the electorate looks in on parliament. Look at the embarrassment of the SNP’s numerous positions on the currency an independent Scotland would adopt. Alex Salmond’s assertion that Scotland would walk into a sterling currency zone is hotly disputed. Not only by the UK government, but also by leading advocates of independence. The chairman of the Yes campaign openly disagrees with Salmond.

But the loyalty demanded by SNP ministers of their back-benchers must have come at a cost. A new constituency member such as North East Fife’s Rod Campbell voted this week to close Cupar Sheriff Court, despite arguing to the contrary. Uncomfortable stuff. Mr Campbell must be hoping the Kingdom of Fife forgets this before the 2016 election. He is not alone.

Could it be that these back-benchers are so wedded to nationalism that the greater goal of independence must be put before local people who elected them to represent their interests? Will these backbenchers ever say no to the great leader?

The whole article is available here. 

* Caron Lindsay is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34981 for Twitter and emails.

3 Comments

  • “meaning long journeys and increased pressure on already over capacity city courts”

    In don’t know the details but the County Courts that have been closed in my neck of the woods were very poor in terms of facilities. It’s one thing having a nearby Court – but if you get there and there is nowhere to park nearby, nowhere private to speak to your lawyer, there is no disabled access, no facilities to get tea/coffee let alone a sandwich then other factors come in to play.

  • Fair enough Robin – like I said I don’t know the local circumstances. But there are a few courts I can think of that have closed in my neck of the woods that few people will regret the passing of!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJames Brough 31st Jul - 11:03am
    Steve, There are many LGBT people - note, not just homosexuals - who face persecution and death for no other reason than their sexuality. In...
  • User AvatarJennie 31st Jul - 11:03am
    Hannah: Me and Vince and ballroom dancing... O:-) This comment is totally on topic, right? Hmm maybe not. I used to play in goal in...
  • User AvatarWilliam Barter 31st Jul - 11:00am
    Are we not liberals? Can we not tolerate different opinions? How is Caron starting a piece saying football is not for her in any way...
  • User AvatarHannah Bettsworth 31st Jul - 10:55am
    Haha Jennie let's not get into Lib Dem OTPs ;) If anyone is taking objection to my earlier comment it was continuing the Anchorman references....
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 31st Jul - 10:47am
    Joe Bailey 57 MPs or 100 MPs the result would be the same….The 57 could have voted against any of, as you put it, “a...
  • User AvatarChrisB 31st Jul - 10:45am
    >government departments and public bodies will now be required >to take Cornwall’s views into account when making policy decisions. I don't understand this line at...