LibLink…Tavish Scott: Courting election woe with party first

Nobody ever goes near a court without there being severe stress involved. Whether it’s for a criminal matter, because you’re in debt or going through a horrendous family situation, being able to access the justice system easily is critical. The SNP Government in Scotland seeks to centralise court proceedings, meaning long journeys and increased pressure on already over capacity city courts. Last week a Holyrood committee, with a majority of SNP MSPs, backed the Government’s approach. What was striking was that they all spoke up for their own local facilities before voting to close them.

Tavish Scott used his Scotsman column this week to take these MSPs to task. Tavish is no stranger to acting on principle to stand up for his constituents. He resigned as Deputy Minister for Parliament in 2001 when he could not agree with measures taken on fisheries by the Scottish Executive.

If those SNP MSPs had done the same thing and voted to save their local courts, what would have happened to them? The Government’s overall majority is on a knife edge already, so they would have got little more than a hard stare from the Chief Whip.

Tavish writes in the Scotsman that putting party unity first in the hope of achieving independence in the referendum next year won’t do them much good in the long run.

The big picture still points to 18 September, 2014. The independence referendum provides a laser-like focus for Nationalists. Nothing is allowed to get in the way of the objective that remains the only factor that unites all SNP members.

Divided parties do not look good as the electorate looks in on parliament. Look at the embarrassment of the SNP’s numerous positions on the currency an independent Scotland would adopt. Alex Salmond’s assertion that Scotland would walk into a sterling currency zone is hotly disputed. Not only by the UK government, but also by leading advocates of independence. The chairman of the Yes campaign openly disagrees with Salmond.

But the loyalty demanded by SNP ministers of their back-benchers must have come at a cost. A new constituency member such as North East Fife’s Rod Campbell voted this week to close Cupar Sheriff Court, despite arguing to the contrary. Uncomfortable stuff. Mr Campbell must be hoping the Kingdom of Fife forgets this before the 2016 election. He is not alone.

Could it be that these back-benchers are so wedded to nationalism that the greater goal of independence must be put before local people who elected them to represent their interests? Will these backbenchers ever say no to the great leader?

The whole article is available here. 

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

3 Comments

  • “meaning long journeys and increased pressure on already over capacity city courts”

    In don’t know the details but the County Courts that have been closed in my neck of the woods were very poor in terms of facilities. It’s one thing having a nearby Court – but if you get there and there is nowhere to park nearby, nowhere private to speak to your lawyer, there is no disabled access, no facilities to get tea/coffee let alone a sandwich then other factors come in to play.

  • Fair enough Robin – like I said I don’t know the local circumstances. But there are a few courts I can think of that have closed in my neck of the woods that few people will regret the passing of!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarP. J. 21st Sep - 11:29am
    @Arnold Kiel '(your cherished sovereignty)' Far from it. I merely probe the arguments in the hope of opening minds. IMO Brexit is just sad. A...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 21st Sep - 11:19am
    I certainly want to see a separate Parliamentary decision on Article 127 of the EEA treaty. The Government should not be allowed to take the...
  • User Avatartheakes 21st Sep - 11:08am
    Who watches PPB's? Time they were done away with.
  • User AvatarYeovil Yokel 21st Sep - 10:52am
    Tom Harney - agree, you & I are obviously not part of the In-Crowd.
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 21st Sep - 10:48am
    Brilliant. I have changed my twitter profile to say alt-middle.
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 21st Sep - 10:46am
    Flo, please comment on Caroline Lucas' point that transferring EU policies into UK law is all very well, but the removal of the enforcement mechanism...