Eric Avebury writes… Light on the horizon for some gay asylum seekers

In 1995 our immigration law was amended so that asylum applicants from countries that were designated as ‘safe’ no longer had a right to appeal against refusal unless their case was ‘certified’ by the Secretary of State. With a Border Agency prone to error, a risk arose that people with good cases might be unjustly be detained, speeded through a truncated process and deported.

Even the Home Office recognised that in some designated countries, there was endemic persecution of women. In 2005 an Order was made adding some countries to the list of those deemed safe, but for men only.

I asked for a similar exception be made for LGBT people, on the floor of the House and in correspondence with the Minister, Lord Bassam, pointing to the particular case of Jamaica, where, notoriously, homophobia was (and still is) rampant. The power to do so exists in law, but the Government refused to exercise it.

Over ten years later, after a good deal more unproductive correspondence and debates with both Labour and Tory Ministers, the Court of Appeal has come to the rescue!

In the case of JB (Jamaica), the court ruled that the claimant hqad been wrongly detained, and the designation of Jamaica as a safe country for LGBT people was unlawful.

The Government is spending public money on an appeal to the Supreme Court, but with luck, the genie’s out of the bottle. The whole subject of LGBT persecution, not just in Jamaica but also in a number of other Commonwealth countries where same sex relationships are outlawed, must surely be considered.

The Commonwealth Charter, agreed by member states last December, commits them to
“…equality and respect for the protection and promotion of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, for all without discrimination on any grounds as the foundations of peaceful, just and stable societies”.

Yet in Uganda, American evangelical missionaries openly incite hatred of gays, leading to the Anti-Homosexuality Bill and the murder of the brave gay rights activist David Kato a year ago. In Gambia, homosexuality is illegal and President Jammeh refers to gays as ‘Satanic’.
Surely, these grave breaches of the Charter should attract condemnation from the Commonwealth Heads of Government when they meet in Sri Lanka in November.

In the meanwhile, the Government must demonstrate their commitment to equality between people of all sexual orientations, as provided by our own Equality Act, by withdrawing their appeal to the Supreme Court, and amending the immigration law to restore the right of gay people from homophobic states to appeal against refusal of asylum applications.

* Eric Lubbock, Lord Avebury, is a working peer, and Vice-Chair, Parliamentary Human Rights Group. He blogs here.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Graham Evans 24th Jun '13 - 12:55pm

    With a few exceptions, British Governments, as distinct from the UK Parliament, have a pretty poor record when it comes to promoting gay rights, whether at home or abroad. Notably examples are:

    1. Homosexuality was only decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 1982 as a a result of a ECHR judgement.

    2. The notorious Section 28 legislation was promoted by the British Government in 1988.

    3. In 1996 the Government of John Major opposed Euan Sutherland in the ECHR regarding the age of consent. (The court ruled against the British Government but the age of consent was not equalised until the election of the Labour Government in 1997.)

    4. During John Major’s time as PM, the Government also opposed the case brought in the ECHR regarding gays serving in the armed forces. The case overlapped with the election of the Labour Government which nevertheless continued to fight the case and only amended the regulation after the ECHR ruled that the ban on gays in the military was illegal.

    5. While the 1997 Labour Government did eventually repeal Section 28, it was scarcely high on its listed of priorities. Its first attempt at repeal was not until 2000, and repeal was only finally achieved in 2003.

    In the light of this history, David Cameron’s promotion of the Gay Marriage Bill is actually something of an exception when it comes to UK governments being proactive.

  • Thank you for your hard work, and for your perseverance Eric.

    I was in Paris this weekend, where Gay Pride celebrated the passing of the marriage equality for lesbians and gays, and with our own legislation likely to pass shortly, its too easy to forget the dangers that still face many LGBT people living around the world.

    I’d like to think that a Lib-Dem Govt would not be fighting these cases, or defending the ‘principles’ that lie behind them…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarmalc 23rd Jul - 11:05pm
    Christopher You might be right, but consolidating or not, it's still the worlds largest bank spending 400 million dollars on a new office block in...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 23rd Jul - 10:29pm
    I have come to see that 3-member STV (which I know is smaller constituencies than many would prefer in this party) could be quite workable...
  • User AvatarClootie 23rd Jul - 10:29pm
    Article 50 http://archive.is/ItEss
  • User AvatarClootie 23rd Jul - 10:27pm
    If anybody knows about dirty tricks it is Alistair!
  • User AvatarGordon 23rd Jul - 10:13pm
    Conor McGovern - Not necessarily. That's down to how the profits are allocated between profits on the one hand and wages/salaries on the other. However,...
  • User AvatarConor McGovern 23rd Jul - 9:54pm
    Gordon, the question is if industry thrives, will people necessarily?
Sun 24th Jul 2016
Tue 26th Jul 2016
Thu 28th Jul 2016
Sat 30th Jul 2016
Mon 1st Aug 2016
Sat 6th Aug 2016
Wed 10th Aug 2016
Fri 12th Aug 2016
19:00
Thu 18th Aug 2016