Norman Lamb MP writes…Tackling Mental Health stigma and discrimination: the NHS 65 years on

65 years ago today, the foundations of our modern National Health Service were laid based on the recommendations of a Liberal, William Beveridge. The founding principle that our NHS should always be free at the point of use endures today. The NHS now treats around a million people every 36 hours, with 300 million GP appointments each year. It is a national institution of which we are rightly proud.

However, the National Health Service is far from perfect. Significant changes are needed to cope with the challenges faced by the fact that people are living longer, and are living with an increasingly complex range of long-term health conditions. It is crucial that we find ways of working smarter, and in a more integrated way, to keep costs under control and ensure that individual patients don’t fall through gaps in the system. Nowhere, however, is the need for change clearer, and more acute, than in the field of mental health – and the gap in experience between those with physical health problems and people suffering from mental ill-health is worst when it comes to crisis care.

During our lives every one of us will either suffer from or have a relative or a close family friend that suffers from a mental health problem. 1 in 4 people will, at some point, experience some form of mental illness. In particular, by 2020 the number of people living with dementia is expected to exceed 1 million. But despite the high number of sufferers, there is often still a real stigma around the subject of mental health, which can make life even more difficult for those suffering from mental illness, and make it harder for them to manage the difficulties they face.

There are a whole host of stereotypes associated with people suffering from mental health conditions. These assumptions can come not only from society as a whole but from friends, employers, families and even sometimes from mental health services. Stigma can lead to people being excluded from everyday activities and can often worsen a patient’s mental condition, making it even more difficult to make a full recovery.

It is perhaps unsurprising, therefore, that people too often remain reluctant to go out and seek help with regards to mental health. This needs to change. People should be able to talk openly about having mental health problems, without fear of being stigmatised. We must do much more to remove the discrimination that mental health patients suffer, to make sure people can start the process of recovery, and move on with their lives.

That is why I have championed the idea of ‘parity of esteem’ so that mental health is treated as seriously as physical health. It is not fair that someone with a physical illness can get better care than someone with a mental health problem. We have given NHS England clear direction on achieving parity of esteem through the NHS Mandate, published for the first time last year, with specific objectives designed towards achieving parity. For the first time, there is now a clear obligation upon the NHS to be the primary leading force in changing attitudes and tackling stigma surrounding mental health.

As part of our work to ensure that the NHS continues to adapt, and to meet the needs of a changing society, the Government is today publishing its consultation on the refresh to the mandate for NHS England. This is everyone’s chance to have a say on the priorities for our NHS in the year ahead.  It includes a strong message on prioritising mental health, and working in a more integrated way across the health system.

Key proposals include:

  • ensuring acute and emergency care for people in mental health crisis are as accessible and high quality as they are for physical health emergencies;
  • developing a range of options for funding and implementing waiting time targets for all mental health services by March 2015 and;
  • extending and offering more open access to Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) for children and young people and adults of working age.

To have your say as part of the consultation, click here.  

* Norman Lamb MP is Liberal Democrat Minister of State at the Department of Health

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/35199 for Twitter and emails.

8 Comments

  • Harold A. Maio 5th Jul '13 - 4:00pm

    there is often still a real stigma around the subject of mental health

    No government ought direct a “stigma” against any of its citizens. Mr. Lamb errs to do so.

  • Simon Bamonte 5th Jul '13 - 5:35pm

    I guess our MPs have lost all sense of irony.

    Mr. Lamb talks about the “stigma of mental illness” yet he is part of a government who has, through its votes in Parliament, been persecuting the mentally ill via the DWP/ATOS and the still highly flawed WCA which, for mentally ill people, often makes their illness worse. And he’s also part of a government that has demonised the mentally ill in the press, calling them “scroungers” and “workshy”.

    It would all be funny if it wasn’t so sadly tragic.

  • Richard Shaw 5th Jul '13 - 6:20pm

    Simon,

    The ATOS system may be rubbish and may adversely affect those with poor health but it’s simply not credible to accuse the government, this or previous ones, of systematically ‘persecuting’ people with mental or physical illnesses.

    It irks me somewhat, as someone who has experience of caring for someone with severe mental illnesses, that every time Norman or anyone else writes a piece here on LDV or elsewhere regarding work to improve mental healthcare that some people immediately snarkily dismiss it, more often than not citing ATOS or whatever – as if only people who interact with ATOS have mental health problems – rather than actually engaging.

    A key area that needs improvement is the variety, availability and quality of mental healthcare services within the NHS (for it is truly lacking). This would be a higher priority for me than the DWP as more ill people will interact with their NHS Trust than with ATOS (for even otherwise healthy people in employment with comfortable salaries can develop mental illnesses). If the NHS care was better then people might not develop more serious problems and perhaps becoming unable to work in the process, and therefore avoid any unpleasant interaction with the DWP.

  • It is good that Norman Lamb is championing ‘parity of esteem’ as enshrined in the NHS mandate ,but has anyone ever heard Jeremy Hunt do the same?

  • Is it not also worrying that Shirley Williams is advocating charging for GP appointments? Is that supposed to help?

    http://opendemocracy.net/ournhs/caroline-molloy/shirley-williams-suggests-new-nhs-charges

  • “but it’s simply not credible to accuse the government, this or previous ones, of systematically ‘persecuting’ people with mental or physical illnesses.”

    But that is what has happened. From Blair, to Brown, to McGuire, to Lewis, to Cameron *spits*, to Clegg, to Lamb, McVey, IDS, the list goes on and on and the desire to vilify disabled people is totally ingrained into their brains.

    Oh, and up to 25,000 carers to lose Carers Allowance when PIP comes in, followed by the scrapping of Carers Allowance completely. This coalition has been murder for disabled people and carer…….quite literally

  • I feel Norman Lamb should listen to the concerns and possible solutions to service users who actually have had experience of the Mental Health Care System especially in the sleepy county of Somerset whereby it can escape the eyes of Westminster. There can be no better way to making cost effective improvements than to hear what the man on the ground has experienced and maybe help others in a similar situation with their personal experiences of how to get well which could be a positive, empowering experience for all concerned.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarColin 30th Jul - 1:08am
    I think you are wrong. I think an independent Scotland will split England down the middle, and Northern English people will look to Scotland. As...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 30th Jul - 12:31am
    So - we received no donations above £2000. Perhaps we received biggish donations in the £500-£1900 range. It seems reasonable to deduce that our average...
  • User AvatarTim13 30th Jul - 12:24am
    Stephen Donnelly A lot of corporate input - stalls at conference, more meals with corporate entrance fees paid etc? Reflective of the corporate wish to...
  • User AvatarAllan 29th Jul - 11:59pm
    I note you say if we want to meet our targets, I hope you also note that when the targets got set no one asked...
  • User AvatarT-J 29th Jul - 11:54pm
    @Colin 'Go, Scotland. Show us how it’s done. Give us the alternative model in the North that we can look to and be inspired by.'...
  • User AvatarStephen Donnelly 29th Jul - 11:36pm
    Good post from a great 'old school' liberal. We have a lot to learn from his constant, reasonable, and reliable, promotion of liberal values.