Opinion on Nick’s second anniversary: Neil Stockley – People are listening, now’s the time for Nick to tell our story

I came across an old Liberal Democrat Voice post the other day. In May 2007, Nick Clegg called for the party to develop a “narrative” to accompany its policies. Just over six months later, Nick was elected Lib Dem leader and was thus in the best possible position to make such a narrative happen.

During the leadership campaign, his abilities as a communicator were the most frequently heard point of “the case for Nick”. So, after two years as leader, how is he doing?

Well . . . there were more misses than hits in 2009. Nick’s early campaign broadcasts for the May elections failed to grasp a number of opportunities to tell the party’s political story, though this was partly redeemed later in the campaign.

The Lib Dems’ pre-manifesto, A Fresh Start for Britain, tried to update “a plague on both your houses”, the staple political narrative of third parties, for 2009. (“Labour let us all down . . . The Conservatives say they want change but all they really want is to keep things the way they are . . . Only the Liberal Democrats have the ideas, the energy, and the ambition to provide the new hope the country needs . . .We carry the torch of progress now.”)

But the document was as dull and uninspiring as any the party has produced. And “the plague” story was quickly drowned out by a counter-story about whether the Lib Dems’ policy to scrap tuition fees would make in into the manifesto.

Worse still, the whole thing became bogged down in arguments about party processes and who said what at which meeting. Any story about exactly how the Liberal Democrats would make a “fresh start” was lost. But then, maybe there wasn’t one. For instance, what are the party’s simple, concrete, credible ideas (1) for “building a sustainable economy”? For creating a fairer society?

(Nick’s own work, The Liberal Moment, published on the eve of autumn conference, was much a more interesting offering but was not, in itself, a political narrative.)

These problems spilled over into autumn conference. Nick’s talk of “savage cuts”, the less than compelling attempts to explain why the tuition fees policy is too costly (no stories) and media tales of colleagues’ grumpiness about Vince Cable’s failures to consult colleagues over the “mansion tax” did not convey the sort of narrative that the party would want. Only at the end of conference did Nick urge the party to campaign on the promise of “fair taxes” and explain what this means. Overall, a big opportunity was missed.

However, none of this distract us from a basic truth: the party’s brand (another way of saying its “narrative”) is in very good shape under Nick’s leadership.

First, Populus research conducted in mid-September in the run up to autumn conference showed the Lib Dems perceived as the top party “for ordinary people, not the best off” as well as the most “united” and the most “honest and principled” party. On all three of these tests, the Lib Dems scored better than last year, and miles ahead of where we were in 2007. And the party’s image has kept its green tinge. We are seen as the party best able to “tackle the problem of climate change”.

Second, Nick now embodies some of the things that voters like about the Lib Dems. In the Populus survey, he edged out David Cameron for “meaning what he says” as opposed to “saying what he thinks people want to hear”.

In the Ipsos MORI pre-conference poll, he came first out of the three main party leaders for being “more honest than most politicians” and was less likely than either Brown or Cameron to be seen as “out of touch with ordinary people”. Populus found that he also scored well for being “good for you and your family”, and for being “in touch”.

Slowly but surely, day by day, week by week, with the things he says and the ways he says them, Nick is conveying what the party is all about.

There is also strong evidence that, as they get to know him better, the public are warming to Nick. This month, YouGov found that 28% of those polled “don’t know” what sort of job he is doing as leader of the Lib Dems. That figure is much higher than for the other leaders, but well down from 39% a year ago. YouGov gave Nick a spread for “doing well” of plus 12%, a big turnaround from minus 6% in December 2008 (2). Lack of awareness, not lack of popularity, is the main challenge.

What all this tells me is the Lib Dems could be up for a very successful general election campaign in 2010 – if we to play to our strengths (see above).

But to do that, we will need to put forward some more simple, credible suggestions about what the “fresh start”, standing for ordinary people and not the privileged, caring more about environmental issues than the other parties, would look like. And, above all, Nick needs to tell people some stories about the solutions that the Lib Dems offer. People seem ready to listen.

* Neil Stockley is a public affairs consultant and active Liberal Democrat, and was the party’s policy director in the mid-1990s. He blogs here.

(1) See Chip Heath and Dan Heath, Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die (Random House, 2007)
(2) But the spread was better over the autumn. Click here.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/17214 for Twitter and emails.

5 Comments

  • Great stuff. Too often we are content with being an “And Finally” paragraph at the end of a longer piece about “real parties.” We must recognise what we always try to demonstrate to others – that the other two parties are the same, obsessed with their own issues and perspectives. If we want the chance to put forward a different vision then we have to fight for column inches and gain recognition on our own terms. That means our press and campaign operation needs to stop just trying to get a Lib Dem paragraph in Labour and Tory stories but make the headlines ourselves by running our own agenda

  • Nick, I’m sorry to say is very weak, very underwhelming, and very LOST in the world of tough politics. Charles Kenndy or Paddy Ashdown were our best bets. Too many wimps on the front benches! And an ineffective PR/Marketing team at Cowley St does not help.

  • Matthew Huntbach 21st Dec '09 - 1:30am


    The Ipsos MORI poll pulbished in today’s Observer shows that Nick Clegg is the most popular of the 3 party leaders . He had a net “satisfaction” spread of +13%, compared to +6% for Cameron and -35% for Brown

    But what do those polled mean by this?

    If I were asked “Is Cameron doing a good job in his role?”, I wouldn’t have a clue how to answer, because I wouldn’t know what the question means. He could be doing a good job in getting the Conservative Party more support while doing so by pushing forward policies which I detest. So should I say “yes” or “no” to the question if that is the case? If Cameron were losing his party support, should I, as a LibDem supporter say “yes” to the question “is he doing a good job?” on the grounds in my opinion the more support he loses for it, the better it is?

    People may well think they don’t much know or care about Clegg, but suppose he is doing a good job, so answer “yes” to this. Sometimes I think people answer “yes” to whether a LibDem leader is doing a good job on the grounds they think the job of a LibDem leader is to be ineffectual. Right now, if I were a Labour or a Conservative Party supporter, I’d say yes, Clegg is doing a very good job at what I regard the job of leader of the Liberal Democrats to be.

    I was very forthright with my opinions on Clegg at the time of the leadership election, and I see no reason to change anything I wrote then, except that what I said would happen if Clegg won now has happened.

2 Trackbacks

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 21st Sep - 2:45pm
    I find the candidacy of a local doctor interesting for two reasons. One, doctors are still trusted more than politicians. Two, he provides a counter...
  • User AvatarRichard 21st Sep - 2:19pm
    I would love to see the Gantt chart showing how you get from publishing plans for consultation at the end of October to publishing final...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 21st Sep - 2:18pm
    There is absolutely nothing in Clegg's remarks that suggests he's even remotely thinking about devolving power either to England or to English regions on a...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 21st Sep - 2:13pm
    @ Rabi Martins, @ Lester Holloway. Yes, Do it. Do what John Tilley is suggesting for the reasons he has given in an earlier post....
  • User AvatarDavid-1 21st Sep - 2:09pm
    If Clegg goes along with "English votes for English laws" he will have betrayed everything liberalism has ever stood for. EVFEL is not devolution. It...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 21st Sep - 2:06pm
    Tony, the blandness was in the Sunday Post article which is also linked to. The strong language came in his later article on the Lib...