I suspect most politicians have used the “it’s a hypothetical question” reason to avoid answering a question. Over at Slate there’s an interesting piece praising Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Obama for his enthusiasm in answering hypotheticals, which very much sets him out from the crowd.
Hat tip: Comment Central.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Enough is enough: Women and girls deserve better (Lib Dem Women)
To paraphrase Shakespeare’ ‘something is rotten in the state of Britain’ (Judy Abel)
Born to be a Refugee… (Dalila Henniche Maali)
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
Observations of an Expat An Iranian Who’s Who (Tom Arms)
Stanley Unwin is now remembered by a blue plaque at his old home in Long Buckby
Eddie Waring's "Dark Satanic Mills End" was at Hilton Park, Leigh
Write a guest post for Liberal England
north easterly
The Joy of Six 1560
When Fiction intrudes on real life
James Fox is interviewed about his acting career in 1968
A successful visit
Brazilian footballer falls down hole celebrating goal that was then disallowed
How Bodhana Sivanandan became British women's chess champion at the age of 11
Judy Abel Judy Abel Judy Abel Judy Abel 
Hywel 
2 Comments
Some might say he’s slightly oer enthusiatic – he’s made several gaffs as a result of this not least coming out and saying that he wont use nuclear weapons ‘under any circumstances’ – which is certainly a welcome statement but not necessarily a sensible one for a future President of the United States.
I think that in answer to Mark’s point there are some that make sense to answer (for example, “If you were to have a vacancy for the Supreme Court who would you look to as a model Justice?”) and some, such as the nuclear question, that are probably best avoided for the reason Letterman hints at.
Giving too much detail in answer to hypotheticals though only risks offending your supporters. Obama is in a situation where it is in his interests to do so to show how different he is. No such benefit would be had for Hilary Clinton for instance (whose main appeal will be the “experienced and pragmatic” card).