Someone’s attacked you online; should you respond?

The US Air Force may not seem the obvious place to go for advice on this, but they do seem to take online communication seriously and are an organisation whose activities, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan, are frequently talked about online.

Being also rather a large bureaucracy, they’ve created a flowchart to help decide how to respond to online comments. Some parts are, er…, very American management speak (“proactively share your story”) but there’s also a lot of good sense in it, particularly in its five headings about responding to blog postings:

Transparency (make clear who you are)
Sourcing (give sources for your claims)
Timeliness (respond quickly)
Tone (the tone you use reflects on yourself and your organisation)
Influence (put your efforts into the sites that matter most)

Anyway, here is the full flowchart for your delectation.

UPDATE: Here is the updated version.

Certainly the US Air Force seems to get the Web 2.0 world rather better than the US Army, with its odd description of Twitter.

Hat-tip: David Meerman Scott

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Online politics.
Advert

5 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Newman 23rd Jun - 7:51pm
    I think Catherine might remember me shouting at some Daily Telegraph journalistrat a Brexit debate she attened in Lewes . I went on to join...
  • User AvatarAndy Cooke 23rd Jun - 7:43pm
    Bill le Breton and George Kendall - you've spiked my next article before I even wrote it. What you've just written was exactly what I...
  • User AvatarPeter Brand 23rd Jun - 7:28pm
    One separate point. Tim campaigned on 'no deals, no coalitions'. This means we must not consider a deal now. We can only change this policy,...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 23rd Jun - 7:24pm
    @David Allen "Actually, we had more than that on the fella. We had the IFS saying that his economic plans wouldn’t work and that manic...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 23rd Jun - 7:19pm
    I'm not sure Charles Kennedy had a long term history of supporting this country's enemies, though. Incidentally, you do accept that a chunk of those...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 23rd Jun - 7:19pm
    Thanks for this. Two points: 1. Free movement should remain open for the self-employed, employed, retired and spouses. I don't mind if there are some...
Sat 1st Jul 2017