Sutton (Notts) By-election

Remember that Simon Hughes told conference in the closing session before Ming’s speech that he was planning to help in a Nottinghamshire County Council by-election on his way home?

Despite the filthy weather that day, Simon’s help clearly paid off. Today was polling day, and an intrepid count-goer has texted the result to Lib Dem Voice’s Night Editor.

Members of the Labour Party should look away now.

UKIP 70 2%
Con 222 8%
Lab 435 16%
Lib Dem 1979 73%

Congrats to all concerned, including newly elected Cllr Jazon Zadrozny. I’m sure someone will be along in the morning who can calculate swing properly, but my calculation from the results last time, where Labour had 45% of the vote and a majority of 981, it’s a swing to the Lib Dems of over 50%.

Co-incidentally, the Ashfield constituency selection advertisement should be turning up in Lib Dem News any time now.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News and Selection news.
Advert

11 Comments

  • (Consults back of envelope) 47.5% swing Lab to Lib Dem.

    The increase in the lib dem share of the vote is 58.5%.

    Great result.

  • It must be the biggest swing to us in Nottinghamshire ever?
    Are there bigger swings in other parts of the East Midlands or in other area’s of the Country?

  • meiriongwril 23rd Mar '07 - 2:04pm

    Oh – yummy

  • Angus J Huck 23rd Mar '07 - 8:07pm

    The Conservatives have nothing to write home about, either, bearing in mind they won the Ashfield Parliamentary Byelection in 1977 (the same night Austin Mitchell took Grimsby).

    Very fitting that Simon Hughes should have been a part of this. Simon won Bermondsey from Labour with (I believe) a similar swing.

  • It is mathematically possible to have a swing of 100%. 44% is extremely impressive though.

  • Liberal First 26th Mar '07 - 6:22am

    These kind of swings are unusual without a local scandal, what was the story with Labour here…?

  • ConservativeHome worked the swing out as about 44%. If it’s not personal scandal, then I suggest a certain income tax “cut” was to blame…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    Tristan, You're right in the sense that you didn't specifically call for PFI. But you did say "if you can persuade private money to provide the funding on t...
  • David Garlick
    Touted as bringing power to people. Power brought down from Govt sounds good but power still not reaching the lowest possible levels in our Communities....
  • Tristan Ward
    @ David Allen "PFI won’t help stop the planet burning" Who said anything about PFI - I didn't. The private money that is building (not enough) house...
  • Joey Vimsante
    I think the EU and UK needs to support not for profit, social media platforms that put the interest of the public, vulnerable people, young people, and nation a...
  • Nick Baird
    With regard to client-side image scanning, the danger of mission creep are real, but I have other concerns. One is whether this is truly a practical and effecti...