Sutton (Notts) By-election

Remember that Simon Hughes told conference in the closing session before Ming’s speech that he was planning to help in a Nottinghamshire County Council by-election on his way home?

Despite the filthy weather that day, Simon’s help clearly paid off. Today was polling day, and an intrepid count-goer has texted the result to Lib Dem Voice’s Night Editor.

Members of the Labour Party should look away now.

UKIP 70 2%
Con 222 8%
Lab 435 16%
Lib Dem 1979 73%

Congrats to all concerned, including newly elected Cllr Jazon Zadrozny. I’m sure someone will be along in the morning who can calculate swing properly, but my calculation from the results last time, where Labour had 45% of the vote and a majority of 981, it’s a swing to the Lib Dems of over 50%.

Co-incidentally, the Ashfield constituency selection advertisement should be turning up in Lib Dem News any time now.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News and Selection news.
Advert

11 Comments

  • (Consults back of envelope) 47.5% swing Lab to Lib Dem.

    The increase in the lib dem share of the vote is 58.5%.

    Great result.

  • It must be the biggest swing to us in Nottinghamshire ever?
    Are there bigger swings in other parts of the East Midlands or in other area’s of the Country?

  • meiriongwril 23rd Mar '07 - 2:04pm

    Oh – yummy

  • Angus J Huck 23rd Mar '07 - 8:07pm

    The Conservatives have nothing to write home about, either, bearing in mind they won the Ashfield Parliamentary Byelection in 1977 (the same night Austin Mitchell took Grimsby).

    Very fitting that Simon Hughes should have been a part of this. Simon won Bermondsey from Labour with (I believe) a similar swing.

  • It is mathematically possible to have a swing of 100%. 44% is extremely impressive though.

  • Liberal First 26th Mar '07 - 6:22am

    These kind of swings are unusual without a local scandal, what was the story with Labour here…?

  • ConservativeHome worked the swing out as about 44%. If it’s not personal scandal, then I suggest a certain income tax “cut” was to blame…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Alan Jelfs
    Well, Zack Polanski and the Greens shows why opening up the eligibility for leadership may not be a good idea....
  • Mick Taylor
    @TristanWard. Growth and doing something about climate change are of course incompatible. I despair that our leaders call for growth rather than the obvious alt...
  • Alex Macfie
    PS The policy document mentions "securing rights to human review and transparency in AI decision-making". This is something that is urgently needed, as anyone w...
  • Alex Macfie
    I took a look at Opportunity's digital policy and it's exactly what the Lib Dems should be saying. https://www.opportunity.org.nz/digital-future See also htt...
  • Mick Taylor
    @DavidRaw. To be strictly accurate, the Church in Wales and the Church in Scotland play no state role since they were disestablished by the 1906-14 Liberal Gove...