Page 3 and the Tories: showing their modern, enlightened face

page 3 news in briefsPoliticsHome’s Paul Waugh reports the Tory distress at the axing of one of their favourite parts of The Sun:

the long-running News In Briefs section of Page 3 of the Sun (it’s been going since 2003) is, I can report, no more.

The section was missing from today’s paper, now under a new editor, and I understand there are no plans to resurrect it.

Several Tory MPs are already in mourning. The party’s popular ‘Breakfast Club’ of MPs (which numbers ministers as well as backbenchers) has a tradition whereby the newest member of the club has to read out the News in Briefs every day. The newbie has to read out the entry in the voice of the Page 3 girl in question.

One MP texted today three shocked letters on hearing of the culling of their favourite bit of the paper: “OMG”.

Yes, you tread that right: an MP ‘has to read out the entry in the voice of the Page 3 girl in question’. Those modern, enlightened Tories, eh?

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from May 2007 to Jan 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

14 Comments

  • Get a sense of humour.

    Also, not very ‘liberal’ to try to ban Page 3 it is it? It’s not like you middle class guardian-reading, lentil-munching weirdos read the sun anyway. Too late now.

  • What a dull world you wish to create.

  • Another depressing “we stand for nothing, ha, ha, ha” facepalm.

  • Geoffrey Payne 26th Jun '13 - 1:22pm

    You would have thought that the failure of the US Repubican party to win the woman’s vote should be a lesson for all right wing political parties.

  • Stuart Mitchell 26th Jun '13 - 5:53pm

    At least the Tories don’t want to condemn Page 3 girls to the dole queue – which is what some Lib Dems want to do.

  • Maria Pretzler 26th Jun '13 - 7:56pm

    What’s this got to do with banning page 3?

    If it’s true that page 3 is gone, it hasn’t been banned – the Sun editor has merely decided to get rid of it, and without big fanfares, by the looks of it, on a day when it would cause very little comment.

    I wonder whether some people who have commented in this thread so far do protest just a little bit too much?

  • Maria Pretzler 26th Jun '13 - 8:18pm

    But quite possibly he hasn’t decided to get rid of it anyway.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/jun/26/sun-page-3-topless-women-david-dinsmore

    Happy now?

    I am sadly getting used to seeing that women’s dignity is not a high priority when a bunch of LibDems starts arguing about this kind of issue.

  • David Wilkinson 26th Jun '13 - 8:33pm

    The trouble is the comments of the page 3 girl make a lot more sense than any Tory MP

  • I read it to mean that Page 3 Girls are still with us; only the “news in Briefs” vox-pop is gone.

  • Stuart Mitchell 27th Jun '13 - 7:09am

    @Maria
    “What’s this got to do with banning page 3?”

    I was just contrasting Stephen’s faux outrage at the way the Tories patronise these women, with the fact that he’d like them to lose their jobs.

    I’d rather have the mickey taken out of me than lose my job any day, so who’s showing insufficient respect here?

  • Is the Breakfast Club men only? Is Theresa (of “nasty party” fame) one of the Ministers? We should be told.

  • @Maria – it’s true that your liberty is worth more than your dignity. You should be free to make your own choices as regards your dignity, but your liberty is inalienable, because without it you no long have the ability to choose how to handle such things as your dignity. If people want to get naked and photographed for a newspaper, that’s up to them; if people want to buy that paper they should be free to do so. Why do you want to remove this liberty from them? Also, you’ve made it clear that you think Page 3 girls have lost dignity by their appearance, can you explain further how these women have diminished in your eyes? I find it very strange that you think they have less dignity because they’ve had a photo taken, and it seems to me that it’s very telling about how you perceive yourself that you’re making such proclamations about your view of others.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarnigel hunter 14th Feb - 10:55pm
    We need the best person for the job, male or female with specific skills that can be used for campaigning and when elected can know...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 14th Feb - 9:57pm
    Oh, Simon. Where to begin on the party's failings on this. The huge one was not to make sure that we had all women shortlists...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 14th Feb - 9:47pm
    @AndrewR I think if you refer back to one of the previous threads on this topic you will find that David Evans provided a comprehensive...
  • User AvatarAndrewR 14th Feb - 9:11pm
    Paul Holmes How many of the 57 Lib Dem seats had a female candidate in 2015?
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 14th Feb - 9:09pm
    In her recent article Sal Brinton referred to the fact that in the governance consultation response last autumn "the Federal Executive received many comments and...
  • User Avatarjohnmc 14th Feb - 8:46pm
    sad news, and thoughts go out to the family of this fascinating and wise man.