Why march today?

This is just to follow up my earlier post to talk about why we marched today. These are my personal views.

Since the referendum, there has been an increase in racial abuse directed at people in this country. One of the things I was marching for was to stay loud and clear that immigrants are welcome in this country.

Secondly, I was marching for the 48% of people who voted “remain”, to say that we stand with you, we believe the UK’s future lies in positive co-operation with our European partners. I was marching to say clearly that we believe that whatever settlement is worked through, visa vis our relations with the rest of Europe, we need to have those principles of co-operation and tolerance at the centre of our thinking.

I was certainly not marching against the 52% of people who voted in the referendum, by the way. Indeed, I was marching for them. Surely they want everyone in the country to be involved in informing the debate which is now ongoing about our future. It seems a very positive way forward to me.

Do I not support democracy? I have said earlier:

We had a very long referendum campaign with an extremely thorough thrashing out of every conceivable angle of debate. It was on the telly, radio and social media at breakfast, lunch and supper time for months. Everybody had a chance to have their say. The turnout was massive. The result was clear. We are a union – the United Kingdom – so the majority prevails. End of. The people have spoken. Trust the people.

I hope that is clear. I stand by that. But as we approach the thousands of decisions which will need to be taken, it is right that democracy continues beyond a simple referendum, and continues to inform our elected representatives through all forms of activities, including marches.

We need to bear in mind that parliament is sovereign – that’s what many people voted “leave” for – to maintain the sovereignity of our parliament. So it is right that our representatives now consider all the many issues, and the march today was to help inform that process.

What about the cost of policing the march? Well, I am sure that if leave had lost by a narrow margin, they would be screaming from the roof tops about it. Democracy does not end at the ballot box. If tens of thousands of people feel strongly enough to give up their Saturdays to march for Europe, then it is right that policing is provided, as it is for a hundred and one other causes day-in-day-out throughout the year.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist and member of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Peter Hayes 2nd Jul '16 - 9:45pm

    Paul, two great posts here, wish we could have been there.

  • paul barker 2nd Jul '16 - 11:13pm

    Great posts but I cant agree that every conceivable angle was thrashed out. The problems raised by Brexit for NI were touched on & then ignored. The inevitable break-up of The UK got mentioned & summarily dismissed as part of “Project Fear”. Did everyone who voted Leave knowingly vote to make a Scottish break-away vastly more likely ? If even 5% of Leave voters didnt grasp the implications for The Unity of Britain then the Leave majority dissapears, thats how close it was.
    Thats before I get on to the legitimacy of a Second Referendum on The EU. I took part in the first one & my understanding was that it was supposed to be binding. I dont remember any talk about having another one. If we can have two then why not three or four ?
    The People have spoken, like they did in 2015, is anyone suggesting that we should have no more Elections ? There is plenty of precedent for holding a second General Election if the result of the First is unworkable, we did it in 1974. The result of our Second Referendum was a mess so lets have a third or, better still, let Parliament do their job & take the decision. Thats what we pay them for.

  • Who on earth though it a good idea to let people like Bob Geldof, Owen Jones, Jarvis Cocker etc get involved. All those nice families marching through London would surely have made people sympathetic to the EU cause. However, having people like Geldof and Jones addressing the crowd may just have hardened peoples opposition.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    @Peter Martin - " but it does raise the question of why there is so little UK involvement in the sector." ...
  • David Warren
    I have been a trade union member since 1980 and for 20 years was a full time representative of the postal workers union CWU. Yes Liberals do need to relate m...
  • Peter Chambers
    Paul, thanks for this incisive piece on the relationship between the Labour Party and the privation of state provision in the UK. I agree with much of what you ...
  • Carl Pierce
    Sam - Your not alone. Ill be ashamed if my party treats you unfairly....
  • Martin Eggleston
    @Tom Bailey we have our very own example in the UK; Wally Stott composed the Hancocks Half Hour theme tune and was the arranger for many Goon Shows, and albums ...