Person-centred liberalism is a tautology – there’s no other form of liberalism. However, it might be useful to explore a little of what we mean when liberals talk about individualism, the freedom of everybody to be themselves and to make the best of their lives. “Isn’t that the same as the Tories?” a lifelong Labour supporter once said to me.
The idea is central to liberalism. It says that each, precious, separate person is more important than any group of which she or he may be part. Yes, we find and express ourselves in communities and other groups. But it’s the individuals that define the groups, not the other way round.
Take class, for instance. In modern Britain, social class is self-defined and has little to do with income, status, work or even origin. Look at the Labour Party’s leadership! But it still has a lot to do with Labour rhetoric and strikes a chord with their core vote. It’s often a key reference for the attitude which says: “I’ve always voted Labour; so did my parents, because we are working class”. Even so, I was surprised to see Blair’s pollster, Philip Gould, start his autobiography with a quotation from Hegel:
The human being finds his proper identity only in those relations that are in effect the negation of his isolated particularity – in his membership in a group or social class whose institutions, organisations and values determine his very individuality.
I’ve quoted that rather turgid sentence because it makes my point exactly: for Hegel and Gould, the important thing is to be defined by class, not to define yourself. As part of the Labour mindset, it’s also an important indicator about why it’s so hard to move on from the institution that imprisons them.