There are few things that better demonstrate the damage Brexit has done to our country than the loss of our freedom to live, work, study and build a life across Europe.
It was a freedom we took for granted. A freedom that opened doors, broadened horizons and brought people together. A freedom that represented something profoundly liberal: the right of individuals to make choices about their own lives. And it was taken away.
Now, as Prime Minister Andy Burnham continues his discussions with European leaders about rebuilding Britain’s relationship with the European Union, I have a simple message: restore freedom of movement, and do it without delay.
For too long, British politics has treated freedom of movement as something to fear rather than something to celebrate. But what could be more liberal than allowing people to cross borders, pursue opportunities, fall in love, raise families and contribute to communities wherever they choose?
This isn’t simply about economics, important though that is. It’s about opportunity. It’s about internationalism. It’s about recognising that our neighbours across the Channel aren’t strangers to be kept at arm’s length, but friends and partners with whom we share so much.
Of course, restoring freedom of movement would benefit our economy. Businesses could recruit the workers they need. Our NHS and social care services could benefit from a wider pool of talent. Young people would regain opportunities that previous generations enjoyed. And European citizens would once again be able to make Britain their home, enriching our communities culturally, socially and economically.
But the argument must go beyond pounds and pence. Freedom of movement is a statement about the kind of country we want Britain to be. Open or closed? Confident or fearful? Internationalist or inward-looking?
For me, the answer couldn’t be clearer.
Some will inevitably argue that restoring freedom of movement would somehow betray the Brexit referendum. I disagree. Democracy doesn’t mean that a decision taken a decade ago must determine our country’s future forever. Circumstances change, generations change, and democratic debate must be allowed to move forward.
Nor should we pretend that freedom of movement can simply be restored by Britain making a unilateral announcement. It requires negotiation, agreement and reciprocal rights. But that is precisely why the Prime Minister should put it at the heart of his discussions with Brussels. And Liberal Democrats should be leading the argument, not nervously looking over our shoulders at what Reform might say.
We are an internationalist party. We believe in individual liberty, cooperation and breaking down barriers between people. Those principles shouldn’t disappear when the political going gets difficult.
I welcome the Prime Minister’s ambition to build a closer relationship with Europe. But warm words, however welcome, must now become meaningful action. Ultimately, I want Britain back in the European Union, where I believe our future belongs.
Restoring freedom of movement would be an important step on that journey. Prime Minister, the opportunity is there. Please take it.
Doctors Deserve Fair Pay, Not Government Condemnation
I stand firmly with the doctors preparing to strike next month. They aren’t demanding the earth. They’re seeking restoration of pay lost through years of real-terms cuts.
These are dedicated professionals who save lives, work extraordinary hours and keep our NHS functioning despite enormous pressures. Rather than condemning them, ministers should recognise their value and negotiate seriously.
We cannot expect to recruit and retain the doctors our health service desperately needs whilst refusing to pay them fairly. A properly funded NHS requires a properly valued workforce.
The Government must get around the negotiating table, deliver pay restoration and prevent these strikes.
All Eyes on Wednesday’s Budget
Wednesday brings the Budget, and I’ll be watching with interest, hope and, inevitably, a degree of trepidation. Will the Chancellor deliver the bold, progressive measures our country needs? Or will it be another exercise in moving the deckchairs?
I’ll have the coffee ready. Possibly something stronger afterwards!
* Mathew Hulbert is a former Councillor, is a regular commentator on TV and Radio, and is Co-Host of the Political Frenemies podcast.



7 Comments
Any return to Freedom of Movement or the Single Market will require a Referendum of British Citizens, otherwise there is nothing stopping a future Conservative Government taking the UK back out of Freedom of Movement or the Single Market without a Referendum. I am not sure the EU would be happy with that.
Also the starting salary of Consultant Doctors is £115,869 rising to £150,569 after 4 years, they are already extremely well remunerated. How much more do they need? It it taxpayer’s money.
Sorry I should have said £150,569 after 14 years. It is still a massive amount of taxpayer’s money. I think they get paid more than enough. There is only a limited pot of taxpayer’s money and anybody who is earning well over £100,000 is already getting enough of it.
The hubris that was around in 2016 & 2019 is making a comeback. I wonder what’s changed for this careerist….
https://x.com/andyburnham/status/806563566526537728
We should all want a good relationship with our neighbours, but this doesn’t mean we should get into bed with them 🙂 Or even that we should be ultra close financially to the extent we end up being responsible for each others’ debts.
The recent events in France, not to mention Spain, Italy and Belgium, seems to have escaped the attention of everyone on LDV. Tom Arms can normally be relied upon to give us a round up of world events. He told us of events in the USA and India in his last op-ed (18/10/26) but somehow took the view there was nothing worth reporting from France.
I’d say there might be , though. France is in need of a multi-hundred-billion bail out. It doesn’t look to be a good time to be rejoining the EU or even using the single market as a stepping stone to rejoining.
We almost certainly will end up being partly responsible for our neighbour’s huge debt.
The ECB did not end up responsible for Greek debt and safeguards have been strengthened since then to ensure it will not be responsible for French debt either.
Pm. It’s not an easy narrative to make when it doesn’t suit international contributors. Very quick to champion Hungary’s new Prime Minister who released this in regards to recent riots..
‘Seeing this senseless destruction and unjustified violence, perhaps it is now clear to everyone why Hungary takes the toughest possible stance on migration,” Magyar wrote on social media on Sunday, alongside a video showing buildings on fire.
“We will not relax our efforts to protect our external borders or change our immigration policy,”
Freedom of movement benefitted the minority of (often, middle class) people who wanted to live abroad without going through the hassle of applying for a visa, at the expense of the vast majority (often of poorer people) who found themselves either paying higher and higher rents or completely unable to get a decent home because of the rapid immigration-led population increase that FoM was causing, as well as all those who couldn’t get jobs because FoM had saturated the jobs market. That’s largely why we lost the Brexit referendum in a campaign dominated by Freedom of Movement. No, we don’t need to go back there. Brexit has caused harm in many other ways, but the return to a system where the UK Government gets to decide our immigration policy is not a harm.
(And yes I’m aware of how various circumstances including choices by the then Tory Government temporarily caused very high immigration for a few years after Brexit. That’s another story).