12 years to re-state a watered-down pledge. So much for progress. #lab09

The Labour Party manifesto 1997:

We are committed to a referendum on the voting system for the House of Commons. An independent commission on voting systems will be appointed early to recommend a proportional alternative to the first-past-the-post system.

Gordon Brown’s speech to the Labour Party conference 2009:

There is now a stronger case than ever that MPs should be elected with the support of more than half their voters – as they would be under the Alternative Voting system. And so I can announce today that in Labour’s next manifesto there will be a commitment for a referendum to be held early in the next Parliament it will be for the people to decide whether they want to move to the Alternative Vote.

So a 1997 commitment to a proprotional electoral system has become a 2009 commitment to hold a referendum after the next election for a non-proportional system.

Still, at least on House of Lord reform the Labour Party has remained consistent – they’re still trying to remove the hereditary principle:

1997 manifesto: As an initial, self-contained reform, not dependent on further reform in the future, the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords will be ended by statute.

2009 speech: In this next year we will remove the hereditary principle in the House of Lords once and for all.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/16337 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

One Comment

  • There is now a stronger case than ever that Governments should be elected with the support of more than half the voters

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRC 22nd Dec - 9:05am
    @ Malc "In the other I don’t share your confidence that Paul Burstow will hold his seat, I have that down has a Tory gain."...
  • User AvatarCharles Rothwell 22nd Dec - 8:26am
    Ever since Thatcher and her 'break-through' in recruiting C1 and (in particular) C2 voters away from Labour, the Tories have obviously had huge problems in...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 22nd Dec - 8:11am
    I think this country have lost the plot on immigration. Some random examples: Overseas students are, as David Blake says, a possible cohort of people...
  • User AvatarMark Argent 22nd Dec - 2:51am
    If we do find ourselves in the position of being the king-makers, might the argument not be partly pragmatism (deciding which party would offer a...
  • User Avatarstuart moran 22nd Dec - 2:04am
    Sarah Noble So there is one based on your (not unbiased) view. Looking at the odds, the best I can see are 5/1 on for...
  • User Avatarmalc 22nd Dec - 1:57am
    Sesenco It really isn't that complicated. I was in Withington when the LibDems won the seat, it has a large student population and nearly all...