12 years to re-state a watered-down pledge. So much for progress. #lab09

The Labour Party manifesto 1997:

We are committed to a referendum on the voting system for the House of Commons. An independent commission on voting systems will be appointed early to recommend a proportional alternative to the first-past-the-post system.

Gordon Brown’s speech to the Labour Party conference 2009:

There is now a stronger case than ever that MPs should be elected with the support of more than half their voters – as they would be under the Alternative Voting system. And so I can announce today that in Labour’s next manifesto there will be a commitment for a referendum to be held early in the next Parliament it will be for the people to decide whether they want to move to the Alternative Vote.

So a 1997 commitment to a proprotional electoral system has become a 2009 commitment to hold a referendum after the next election for a non-proportional system.

Still, at least on House of Lord reform the Labour Party has remained consistent – they’re still trying to remove the hereditary principle:

1997 manifesto: As an initial, self-contained reform, not dependent on further reform in the future, the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords will be ended by statute.

2009 speech: In this next year we will remove the hereditary principle in the House of Lords once and for all.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/16337 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

One Comment

  • There is now a stronger case than ever that Governments should be elected with the support of more than half the voters

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 30th Oct - 5:17pm
    @ GF "So, what gives? Does someone hold incriminating files on all the MPs? Did they all suddenly convert to latter-day Thatcherism just as everyone...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 30th Oct - 5:04pm
    Dear Toby, some parts of your article are very good, such as the data on life expectancy in some areas of the country and the...
  • User AvatarHelen Tedcastle 30th Oct - 5:03pm
    Green voter ' A secular school can put emphasis on good character and good academic results as much as a faith school.' Of course. The...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 30th Oct - 4:49pm
    This is good stuff. I browse the language forums on Reddit occasionally, it seems to have quite a lot of contributors and a format that...
  • User AvatarDaniel Henry 30th Oct - 4:43pm
    Peter, when you say you "understand the science", are you speaking as a professional scientist yourself? And are you aware that the vast majority of...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 30th Oct - 4:11pm
    David (Allen) just taking two things you have said: "I think this misrepresents the reasons for the resignation. Read what Lester Holloway actually says, not...