12 years to re-state a watered-down pledge. So much for progress. #lab09

The Labour Party manifesto 1997:

We are committed to a referendum on the voting system for the House of Commons. An independent commission on voting systems will be appointed early to recommend a proportional alternative to the first-past-the-post system.

Gordon Brown’s speech to the Labour Party conference 2009:

There is now a stronger case than ever that MPs should be elected with the support of more than half their voters – as they would be under the Alternative Voting system. And so I can announce today that in Labour’s next manifesto there will be a commitment for a referendum to be held early in the next Parliament it will be for the people to decide whether they want to move to the Alternative Vote.

So a 1997 commitment to a proprotional electoral system has become a 2009 commitment to hold a referendum after the next election for a non-proportional system.

Still, at least on House of Lord reform the Labour Party has remained consistent – they’re still trying to remove the hereditary principle:

1997 manifesto: As an initial, self-contained reform, not dependent on further reform in the future, the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords will be ended by statute.

2009 speech: In this next year we will remove the hereditary principle in the House of Lords once and for all.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/16337 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • There is now a stronger case than ever that Governments should be elected with the support of more than half the voters

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User Avatarjedibeeftrix 22nd Aug - 8:34am
    @ PB - "I would say theres an excellent Liberal & Social Democratic case for broad limits to Total State spending. I would suggest a...
  • User AvatarGlenn 22nd Aug - 1:31am
    Amanda. The Ottoman Empire was no more noble than the British Empire. It's treatment of none Muslims was actually subject to shifts in position and...
  • User AvatarGwyn Williams 22nd Aug - 1:13am
    As a family living in Wales we have had too much experience of CAMHS. Much depends on the clinical psychologist involved. For my son who...
  • User AvatarGalen Milne 22nd Aug - 12:54am
    Here we are within "touching distance" of getting Home Rule with the prospect of a federal UK to follow when ultimately England will eventuality "see...
  • User AvatarGalen Milne 22nd Aug - 12:41am
    I don't respect Alex Salmond and I abhor nationalism as a narrow minded credentials that across the world has wrecked misery and havoc wherever its...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 22nd Aug - 12:26am
    My thanks to all for their coments, and particular thanks to David-1 for expanding on what I said about ethical values and the UDHR so...