12 years to re-state a watered-down pledge. So much for progress. #lab09

The Labour Party manifesto 1997:

We are committed to a referendum on the voting system for the House of Commons. An independent commission on voting systems will be appointed early to recommend a proportional alternative to the first-past-the-post system.

Gordon Brown’s speech to the Labour Party conference 2009:

There is now a stronger case than ever that MPs should be elected with the support of more than half their voters – as they would be under the Alternative Voting system. And so I can announce today that in Labour’s next manifesto there will be a commitment for a referendum to be held early in the next Parliament it will be for the people to decide whether they want to move to the Alternative Vote.

So a 1997 commitment to a proprotional electoral system has become a 2009 commitment to hold a referendum after the next election for a non-proportional system.

Still, at least on House of Lord reform the Labour Party has remained consistent – they’re still trying to remove the hereditary principle:

1997 manifesto: As an initial, self-contained reform, not dependent on further reform in the future, the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords will be ended by statute.

2009 speech: In this next year we will remove the hereditary principle in the House of Lords once and for all.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/16337 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

One Comment

  • There is now a stronger case than ever that Governments should be elected with the support of more than half the voters

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 29th Mar - 5:03pm
    g, There is no indication that he would take that much of the Lib Dem vote.
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 29th Mar - 4:50pm
    David Allen 29th Mar '15 - 3:50pm "There is no magic solution to this dilemma." David - I think I should point out that my...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 29th Mar - 4:36pm
    @TechnicalEphemera "The Labour Party has a commitment to control immigration and to address the mechanisms by which low paid EU migrants are brought to this...
  • User AvatarSue S 29th Mar - 4:31pm
    My son in law found it easier to apply for and eventually obtain Australian citizenship than British when he and my daughter were living together...
  • User AvatarPhilip Thomas 29th Mar - 4:30pm
    Free trade is hampered by national governments subsidising their own products. When national governments provide work-related benefits (such as JSA) to their own nationals and...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 29th Mar - 4:25pm
    Simon Oliver "Any greenhouse gas emissions at cruising height have double the warming potential of emissions are ground level, so even producing entirely artificial avgas...
Tue 31st Mar 2015
Sun 5th Apr 2015
Sat 11th Apr 2015
Sun 12th Apr 2015
Sat 25th Apr 2015