12 years to re-state a watered-down pledge. So much for progress. #lab09

The Labour Party manifesto 1997:

We are committed to a referendum on the voting system for the House of Commons. An independent commission on voting systems will be appointed early to recommend a proportional alternative to the first-past-the-post system.

Gordon Brown’s speech to the Labour Party conference 2009:

There is now a stronger case than ever that MPs should be elected with the support of more than half their voters – as they would be under the Alternative Voting system. And so I can announce today that in Labour’s next manifesto there will be a commitment for a referendum to be held early in the next Parliament it will be for the people to decide whether they want to move to the Alternative Vote.

So a 1997 commitment to a proprotional electoral system has become a 2009 commitment to hold a referendum after the next election for a non-proportional system.

Still, at least on House of Lord reform the Labour Party has remained consistent – they’re still trying to remove the hereditary principle:

1997 manifesto: As an initial, self-contained reform, not dependent on further reform in the future, the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords will be ended by statute.

2009 speech: In this next year we will remove the hereditary principle in the House of Lords once and for all.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/16337 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • There is now a stronger case than ever that Governments should be elected with the support of more than half the voters

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTim13 18th Jun - 11:28pm
    Why does David Laws ask the question about "his employees"? Why does he not say he would not like to earn that amount?
  • User AvatarStuart Mitchell 18th Jun - 10:44pm
    I clicked the link to the ISPA website and Kaspersky flashed up a red angry box telling me that it had intercepted a malicious Trojan....
  • User AvatarHywel 18th Jun - 10:40pm
    "By far the greatest predictor of a good income is a good set of qualifications. Pay is a function of productivity. And productivity is a...
  • User AvatarCaracatus 18th Jun - 9:31pm
    Either put up the minimum wage or reform the tax system to reintroduce a 10p rate (20p incluidng National Insurance) but please don't fart about...
  • User AvatarCaracatus 18th Jun - 9:15pm
    It's not pessimism but realism to point out that Clegg is less popular than Jeremy Thorpe at the height of the rinkagate revelations. The party...
  • User AvatarTim13 18th Jun - 9:14pm
    Sorry, Simon McGrath, Liberal Left is quite comfortable working with others than Labour. It would, I am sure have trouble with some of the more...
Wed 19th Jun 2013
Thu 20th Jun 2013
Fri 21st Jun 2013
Sat 22nd Jun 2013
Sun 23rd Jun 2013
Wed 26th Jun 2013
Thu 27th Jun 2013
Sat 29th Jun 2013
17:00
Sun 30th Jun 2013
Mon 1st Jul 2013
Wed 3rd Jul 2013
19:30
Thu 4th Jul 2013
Sat 6th Jul 2013
Sun 7th Jul 2013
Mon 8th Jul 2013
Thu 11th Jul 2013
Sat 13th Jul 2013
Sun 14th Jul 2013
Tue 16th Jul 2013