… because I’ve nothing really to add to Alex’s excellent piece, other than to say, “Oh dear BBC, you really did get your story horribly wrong, didn’t you?”
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Making the most of the Government’s belated action on illegal Israeli settlements (Jonathan Brown)
-
Somerset’s farmers are on the front line of climate change (Sarah Dyke)
-
Mathew on Monday: Local Government Reorganisation review welcome (Mathew Hulbert)
-
Reform is winning because liberal Britain is not listening to its own society (Michal Simon)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Good news about the Family Farm Tax
-
David Alton, Andy Burnham and telescopic radicalism
-
Will Burnham abandon neoliberalism by adopting a radical agenda?
-
Pennsylvania's Kids for Cash Scandal shows the danger of the profit motive in the juvenile justice system
-
Conservative councillor joins Lib Dems in Cannock Chase
-
The AI world and some fallacies about it
-
Yet another government makes a mess of local government reform
-
The Joy of Six 1574
-
Front Street looking great
-
Bryan Ferry: A Hard Rain's A-Gonna Fall
Recent Comments
Mary Reid
David Raw - yes, it would trigger a Parliamentary by-election if she won as Mayor. Selection itself would not require it....
Adrian Moss
Outstanding article. Lib Dems need to lead the way on reasoned arguements in support....
John Kelly
@jonathan brown “I regret to say that I believe our failure to take this message strongly out of parliament and to the people has contributed to us underperf...
David Raw
Does that mean a parliamentary by-election ?...
Jonathan Brown
@Jana - you're right that banning trade in services is much more important than goods, although the Government is seeking to do some of this. The LDFP emergency...
6 Comments
They just saw Guido’s article, and didn’t even bother to follow his link to LDV to find out what was the reference to Grant Shapps about before jumping in conclusions. That’s quality journalism and value for you tax money.
I was thinking of emailing the BBC, but just took a deep bretah and quietly counted to four, as I am sure Grant Shapps will be in touch with the BBC to correct their error.
Appears to have been corrected on the Beeb site now.
Is “Grant Shapps” an anagram?
Possibly of someone I may have heard of?
It’s typical of the BBC to make a correction but not acknowledge it.
James is quite right that the BBC make Winston Smith style changes to stories when they get something wrong. What’s more they do that then don’t actually thank the person who pointed out the error to them in the first place!