How solid is the Tories’ ‘extreme and ragbag’ Euro grouping?

Two days after the Tories attempted to bury the embarrassing news of their decision to set up a new European Parliament grouping comprising some of the more, erm, eccentric right-wing elements on offer, and the cracks are, apparently, already showing (hat-tip: Liberal Conspiracy):

Hannu Takkula, a Finnish Centre party Euro-MP, was quoted as saying by party news website Verkkoapila on Wednesday that he would stay in the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe, one of the European Parliament’s political groupings.

The Conservatives and Reformists Group had said Monday that Mr Takkula would join the new group.

Does the un-defection of a lone MEP actually matter? Well, for the new Tory grouping it does. Here’s why:

while the ECR’s ranks will be dominated by MEPs from the Tories (26 MEPs) and the Polish Law and Justice party (PiS: 15 MEPs), six [now five – Ed.] of the group’s nine national delegations consist of a single MEP.

In other words, should just three [now two – Ed.] of those six MEPs at any point become disillusioned with the group’s direction and threaten to leave, they would effectively hold veto power over the groups’ continued existence (a group requires MEPs from at least seven member states).

As a result, the Tories will arguably need to guarantee these six [now five – Ed.] MEPs positions of influence in the new group.

What a strong position for an incoming British government to find itself in.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Europe / International.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/15470 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

8 Comments

  • So why are the Lib Dems in a European parliamentary grouping that includes homophobics?

  • Mark Littlewood 25th Jun '09 - 1:40am
  • John zims: In the 6th Parliament, ALDE ran a major campaign entitled “ALDE 4 Equality”, which was “aimed at supporting LGBT equality in the EU”. An analysis of group positions in the 5th Parliament found ELDR had a 78% rating in favour of “homosexual equality, abortion and euthenasia” issues (no further breakdown). EPP-ED, on the other hand, had a 30.5% rating for the same category.

    Suggestions about specks of dust versus planks of wood come to mind…..

  • Cameron is not fit to be Prime Minister. I do not think it is inevitable, as some appear to think above.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid-1 30th Jan - 3:48am
    I'm not in the least pleased at the notion of seeing one of the great parties of British history systematically and thoroughly driven into the...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 30th Jan - 3:42am
    John Lister: "Would be a tough sell to critics who’d argue it puts losers into office" In other words, no change from the current system!
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Jan - 2:03am
    Glenn, I would say the basic rate of income tax is a better indicator of public willingness to pay - and governments' interpretation of that...
  • User AvatarAdrian PR 30th Jan - 1:57am
    In response to Stephen Johnson: This isn't really what you want, but the Legislative Council in Victoria (Australia) has used a form of STV with...
  • User AvatarAdrian PR 30th Jan - 1:54am
    Anthony Tuffin writes: > Adrian PR repeated an old fallacy, “STV is not very [party] proportional, just “proportional enough”.” Leaving aside the other parts of...
  • User AvatarT-J 30th Jan - 1:52am
    On the subject of the article, I totally agree. Individual voter registration just makes more sense, at least to my idea that the individual constitutes...