How solid is the Tories’ ‘extreme and ragbag’ Euro grouping?

Two days after the Tories attempted to bury the embarrassing news of their decision to set up a new European Parliament grouping comprising some of the more, erm, eccentric right-wing elements on offer, and the cracks are, apparently, already showing (hat-tip: Liberal Conspiracy):

Hannu Takkula, a Finnish Centre party Euro-MP, was quoted as saying by party news website Verkkoapila on Wednesday that he would stay in the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe, one of the European Parliament’s political groupings.

The Conservatives and Reformists Group had said Monday that Mr Takkula would join the new group.

Does the un-defection of a lone MEP actually matter? Well, for the new Tory grouping it does. Here’s why:

while the ECR’s ranks will be dominated by MEPs from the Tories (26 MEPs) and the Polish Law and Justice party (PiS: 15 MEPs), six [now five – Ed.] of the group’s nine national delegations consist of a single MEP.

In other words, should just three [now two – Ed.] of those six MEPs at any point become disillusioned with the group’s direction and threaten to leave, they would effectively hold veto power over the groups’ continued existence (a group requires MEPs from at least seven member states).

As a result, the Tories will arguably need to guarantee these six [now five – Ed.] MEPs positions of influence in the new group.

What a strong position for an incoming British government to find itself in.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Europe / International.


  • So why are the Lib Dems in a European parliamentary grouping that includes homophobics?

  • Mark Littlewood 25th Jun '09 - 1:40am
  • John zims: In the 6th Parliament, ALDE ran a major campaign entitled “ALDE 4 Equality”, which was “aimed at supporting LGBT equality in the EU”. An analysis of group positions in the 5th Parliament found ELDR had a 78% rating in favour of “homosexual equality, abortion and euthenasia” issues (no further breakdown). EPP-ED, on the other hand, had a 30.5% rating for the same category.

    Suggestions about specks of dust versus planks of wood come to mind…..

  • Cameron is not fit to be Prime Minister. I do not think it is inevitable, as some appear to think above.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 20th Oct - 8:23pm
    Well Joseph, that just looks like one law for some and another for others. Illiberal.
  • User AvatarBarry 20th Oct - 7:41pm
    Re Daniel Walker, your policy of supporting proportional representation is a good one. We do need to get rid of the archaic and clearly not...
  • User AvatarDJ 20th Oct - 7:30pm
    "though it perhaps serves the purposes of those seeking any excuse for a second independence poll." If the Lib Dems do want to be the...
  • User AvatarDJ 20th Oct - 7:25pm
    "I’m not saying it shouldn’t be done, but if we want votes we need to be crystal clear how the increase in benefits is going...
  • User AvatarPeter 20th Oct - 7:25pm
    The Lib Dems are surely not major supporters of parliamentary democracy given the party's willingness to transfer sovereignty to the EU and its unelected commissioners,...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 20th Oct - 7:22pm
    Eddie, The International Criminal Court has to be for the leaders of the losing side. Otherwise, the logic is that Stalin, Churchill and Harry Truman...