LibLink: Simon Hughes: “Like the banks, new nuclear is too big to fail”

At Comment is Free today, Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat shadow secretary of state for energy and climate change) challenges the Tories over their “incoherent” new energy policy and calls for greater investment in renewable energy:

Nuclear power has always required huge amounts of public money and David Cameron’s signal that the Tories are ready to turn on the taps of taxpayer support risks billions which we simply can’t afford. Both Labour and the Tories claim that they will not provide any public subsidy, but both know that this cannot be true when the nuclear industry that has never been able to survive without it.

Like the banks, new nuclear is too big to fail. And like the banks, new nuclear depends on a more or less explicit taxpayer guarantee. Once a nuclear power station is running we will have it for the next 40 years, come what may. No responsible government could ever let a nuclear power generator go bankrupt. This has happened before, when the taxpayer had to bail out British Energy £10bn and accept £73bn of their liabilities. As my colleague Vince Cable has said, nuclear power is the Royal Bank of Scotland of the energy industry.

Read the full piece at the Guardian.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

5 Comments

  • David Allen 22nd Mar '10 - 6:35pm

    Renewables, on the other hand, tend to be too small to succeed!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAdrian 27th Sep - 11:15am
    Thanks for this overview. I learned a lot. I was completely with you on the strikes but now wonder if I was being led astray...
  • User Avatarmalc 27th Sep - 11:10am
    I agree with Christian. With the polls pretty much neck and neck Clinton needed to do well. If viewers watch Trump doing OK in the...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 27th Sep - 10:58am
    It's worth bearing in mind the effect of the other candidates: Gary Johnson and Jill Stein. Gary Johnson has been getting as much as 10%...
  • User AvatarGlenn 27th Sep - 10:02am
    Bill; I'm not referring to the polls about the debate. I'm looking more at the election polls and the persistent evidence so far. If you...
  • User AvatarGlynn Quelch 27th Sep - 9:53am
    Since May this year my list has us standing in 111 of the 145 (i have listed, some may be missing and i am still...
  • User AvatarChristian 27th Sep - 9:18am
    I'd like to think Hillary won however Donald Trumps task was not to make any glaring errors which could hurt him later on. In that...