LibLink: Simon Hughes: “Like the banks, new nuclear is too big to fail”

At Comment is Free today, Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat shadow secretary of state for energy and climate change) challenges the Tories over their “incoherent” new energy policy and calls for greater investment in renewable energy:

Nuclear power has always required huge amounts of public money and David Cameron’s signal that the Tories are ready to turn on the taps of taxpayer support risks billions which we simply can’t afford. Both Labour and the Tories claim that they will not provide any public subsidy, but both know that this cannot be true when the nuclear industry that has never been able to survive without it.

Like the banks, new nuclear is too big to fail. And like the banks, new nuclear depends on a more or less explicit taxpayer guarantee. Once a nuclear power station is running we will have it for the next 40 years, come what may. No responsible government could ever let a nuclear power generator go bankrupt. This has happened before, when the taxpayer had to bail out British Energy £10bn and accept £73bn of their liabilities. As my colleague Vince Cable has said, nuclear power is the Royal Bank of Scotland of the energy industry.

Read the full piece at the Guardian.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/18479 for Twitter and emails.

5 Comments

  • David Allen 22nd Mar '10 - 6:35pm

    Renewables, on the other hand, tend to be too small to succeed!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 16th Apr - 4:55pm
    It is disappointing that 75% if Lib Dems are against good schools on ideological grounds just because they can make a profit from it. Should...
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 16th Apr - 4:53pm
    Tim Farron says he used to work in HE. Perhaps that' s why he seems so uninterested in FE which often has to pick up...
  • User Avatarmalc 16th Apr - 4:48pm
    Does Tim Farron think that voters would believe the Lib Dems on anything to do with students university costs? It's a subject the Lib Dems...
  • User Avatartheakes 16th Apr - 4:41pm
    So what. I am a coalition supporter and support their economic policy and would certainly not vote Labour ever again. However we are doomed at...
  • User AvatarTony Rowan-Wicks 16th Apr - 4:38pm
    I cannot believe that this country has the sort of people in parliament who could achieve what is being suggested by Mathew. The suggestion could...
  • User AvatarMartin 16th Apr - 4:35pm
    Amalric: an interesting discourse and your reference to 'On Liberty' has me wondering about the extent to which Liberalism is constitutionalist-utilitarian or more concerned with...