LibLink: Simon Hughes: “Like the banks, new nuclear is too big to fail”

At Comment is Free today, Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat shadow secretary of state for energy and climate change) challenges the Tories over their “incoherent” new energy policy and calls for greater investment in renewable energy:

Nuclear power has always required huge amounts of public money and David Cameron’s signal that the Tories are ready to turn on the taps of taxpayer support risks billions which we simply can’t afford. Both Labour and the Tories claim that they will not provide any public subsidy, but both know that this cannot be true when the nuclear industry that has never been able to survive without it.

Like the banks, new nuclear is too big to fail. And like the banks, new nuclear depends on a more or less explicit taxpayer guarantee. Once a nuclear power station is running we will have it for the next 40 years, come what may. No responsible government could ever let a nuclear power generator go bankrupt. This has happened before, when the taxpayer had to bail out British Energy £10bn and accept £73bn of their liabilities. As my colleague Vince Cable has said, nuclear power is the Royal Bank of Scotland of the energy industry.

Read the full piece at the Guardian.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

5 Comments

  • David Allen 22nd Mar '10 - 6:35pm

    Renewables, on the other hand, tend to be too small to succeed!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAndy Cooke 23rd Jun - 7:43pm
    Bill le Breton and George Kendall - you've spiked my next article before I even wrote it. What you've just written was exactly what I...
  • User AvatarPeter Brand 23rd Jun - 7:28pm
    One separate point. Tim campaigned on 'no deals, no coalitions'. This means we must not consider a deal now. We can only change this policy,...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 23rd Jun - 7:24pm
    @David Allen "Actually, we had more than that on the fella. We had the IFS saying that his economic plans wouldn’t work and that manic...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 23rd Jun - 7:19pm
    I'm not sure Charles Kennedy had a long term history of supporting this country's enemies, though. Incidentally, you do accept that a chunk of those...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 23rd Jun - 7:19pm
    Thanks for this. Two points: 1. Free movement should remain open for the self-employed, employed, retired and spouses. I don't mind if there are some...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 23rd Jun - 7:15pm
    Andrew T, there is a fair bit of tautology in your comment. - you start with "the ballot box doesn’t lie" and then go on...
Sat 1st Jul 2017