LibLink: Vince Cable opposes Heathrow expansion

planeVince Cable’s constituency of Twickenham is already under the Heathrow flightpath, and he is strongly opposed to any further expansion of the airport.

He writes:

The Davies Commission interim report has put Heathrow at the front of its thinking which is questionable economically, damaging environmentally and probably undeliverable politically.

My strong view is that the Davies review should not decide to press ahead with Heathrow options and I will be making that view known in the strongest terms.

I fully support the need to improve UK business links with airports in the emerging markets of Asia which is important for jobs, but this could be achieved more quickly by reforming and reallocating airport slots; by building up point to point services; and by strengthening the capacity of UK regional airports.

Such is the impact of noise on hundreds of thousands of people in London that pushing ahead with Heathrow expansion is almost certainly the worst option for expanding airport capacity.

There is a petition to sign as well.

* Mary Reid is the Monday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/37533 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Peter Hayes 17th Dec '13 - 6:28pm

    Even now the London airports are unusable for a lot of UK. I had the choice of Gatwick or Birmingham via Holland to go to my employers in America. No choice, several hours drive back home from Gatwick after a red eyes flight or home in no more that 90 minutes from Birmingham. I even had the option of killing time in an art gallery / museum extension in Schipol after having breakfast before the connecting flight.

  • Robson Brown 17th Dec '13 - 8:31pm

    If only Vince had been as enthusiastic in slamming the questionable economically, damaging environmentally and probably undeliverable Browne report a few years ago. Damn these experts and their inconveniently researched opinions.

  • For as long as I can remember Liberals and latterly Liberal Democrats have stuck to a sensible and logical opposition to the ever expanding Heathrow giant.
    But this is not just an issue for those of us who are in this part of London.
    If we are serious about improving life throughout the UK we should all be opposed to a further concentration of millions and millions of pounds of investment in the one part of the country where the economy has been overheated for decades.

    Leaving aside the planning, infrastructure, and general environmental madness of trying to squeeze yet more into Heathrow – it makes no sense whatsoever to expand in the one part of the country that does not need expansion.

  • peter tyzack 18th Dec '13 - 10:15am

    all the London airports could function as one if there was better connections between them. National Express coaches are pretty good, but a step change is needed from that .. instead of wasting money on runways they should construct a MagLev service between the airports.

  • Alex Macfie 18th Dec '13 - 1:31pm

    @peter tyzack: Of course your proposal would need either a new visa category for people in transit in the UK using different aiports, or some mechanism for keeping transit passengers ‘airside’ as they transit between the airports.

  • Thank God for some sense from Vince Cable here.

    The whole agenda is being pushed by a cabal of business interests that is determined to bulldoze Heathrow expansion through despite the disastrous effects it would have on the quality of life for millions of London residents across a large swathe of the capital.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 30th May - 9:10pm
    David Even if the Tories turn out to be utter monsters without the lib dems winning these seats back will be harder than simply saying...
  • User AvatarDavid Cooper 30th May - 9:09pm
    @David Howarth "states should just be able to decide for themselves whether to intervene" Isn't that what happens anyway? Its a wicked world. In the...
  • User AvatarSammy O'Neill 30th May - 9:00pm
    @JohnTilley I do not think you, or indeed anyone else is in a position to describe the comments of other people as "not valid". All...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 30th May - 8:50pm
    David The point was that if that’s your message “vote for us because we’re not x” No, that's not my message. I strongly supported the...
  • User AvatarDavid Howarth 30th May - 8:45pm
    So you think that states should just be able to decide for themselves whether to intervene to prevent human rights abuses in other states without...
  • User AvatarJennie 30th May - 8:38pm
    "The voyeurs until they realised what it meant" *dies laughing* OMG so adorable
Sat 30th May 2015
Sun 31st May 2015
Mon 1st Jun 2015
Tue 2nd Jun 2015
Wed 3rd Jun 2015
Thu 4th Jun 2015
Fri 5th Jun 2015
Sat 6th Jun 2015
Mon 8th Jun 2015
19:30
Tue 9th Jun 2015
Wed 10th Jun 2015
Thu 11th Jun 2015
Fri 12th Jun 2015
Sat 13th Jun 2015
Wed 17th Jun 2015
Thu 18th Jun 2015
Sat 20th Jun 2015
Sun 21st Jun 2015
Thu 25th Jun 2015
Fri 26th Jun 2015
Sat 27th Jun 2015