LibLink: Vince Cable opposes Heathrow expansion

planeVince Cable’s constituency of Twickenham is already under the Heathrow flightpath, and he is strongly opposed to any further expansion of the airport.

He writes:

The Davies Commission interim report has put Heathrow at the front of its thinking which is questionable economically, damaging environmentally and probably undeliverable politically.

My strong view is that the Davies review should not decide to press ahead with Heathrow options and I will be making that view known in the strongest terms.

I fully support the need to improve UK business links with airports in the emerging markets of Asia which is important for jobs, but this could be achieved more quickly by reforming and reallocating airport slots; by building up point to point services; and by strengthening the capacity of UK regional airports.

Such is the impact of noise on hundreds of thousands of people in London that pushing ahead with Heathrow expansion is almost certainly the worst option for expanding airport capacity.

There is a petition to sign as well.

* Mary Reid is the Tuesday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/37533 for Twitter and emails.

6 Comments

  • Peter Hayes 17th Dec '13 - 6:28pm

    Even now the London airports are unusable for a lot of UK. I had the choice of Gatwick or Birmingham via Holland to go to my employers in America. No choice, several hours drive back home from Gatwick after a red eyes flight or home in no more that 90 minutes from Birmingham. I even had the option of killing time in an art gallery / museum extension in Schipol after having breakfast before the connecting flight.

  • Robson Brown 17th Dec '13 - 8:31pm

    If only Vince had been as enthusiastic in slamming the questionable economically, damaging environmentally and probably undeliverable Browne report a few years ago. Damn these experts and their inconveniently researched opinions.

  • For as long as I can remember Liberals and latterly Liberal Democrats have stuck to a sensible and logical opposition to the ever expanding Heathrow giant.
    But this is not just an issue for those of us who are in this part of London.
    If we are serious about improving life throughout the UK we should all be opposed to a further concentration of millions and millions of pounds of investment in the one part of the country where the economy has been overheated for decades.

    Leaving aside the planning, infrastructure, and general environmental madness of trying to squeeze yet more into Heathrow – it makes no sense whatsoever to expand in the one part of the country that does not need expansion.

  • peter tyzack 18th Dec '13 - 10:15am

    all the London airports could function as one if there was better connections between them. National Express coaches are pretty good, but a step change is needed from that .. instead of wasting money on runways they should construct a MagLev service between the airports.

  • Alex Macfie 18th Dec '13 - 1:31pm

    @peter tyzack: Of course your proposal would need either a new visa category for people in transit in the UK using different aiports, or some mechanism for keeping transit passengers ‘airside’ as they transit between the airports.

  • Thank God for some sense from Vince Cable here.

    The whole agenda is being pushed by a cabal of business interests that is determined to bulldoze Heathrow expansion through despite the disastrous effects it would have on the quality of life for millions of London residents across a large swathe of the capital.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 24th Apr - 3:59am
    Austin, It is very loyal of you to take the bullet for others, but you do not explain how several key questions, vital in assessing...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 24th Apr - 3:58am
    Austin, It is very loyal of you to take the bullet for others, but you do not explain how several key questions, vital in assessing...
  • User Avatarmalc 24th Apr - 1:18am
    Mathew Hunchbach " It is not possible to support some item of government expenditure without also supporting some balancing way of paying for it." I...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 24th Apr - 12:46am
    @Matthew Huntbach: "The idea that a junior coalition partner very much smaller than the senior one can dominate the agenda of the coalition is nonsense,...
  • User AvatarCarlQ 24th Apr - 12:04am
    I think some people may have missed the point where Austin said he was happy for feedback. Repeating the same points again in a slightly...
  • User AvatarPsi 23rd Apr - 11:54pm
    Jayne Mansfield “One of the arguments most often put forward by people who I overhear saying they intend to vote UKIP is the anger that...