Opinion: Ed Fordham’s Career Choice

Last night my Dad rang me all concerned about my career choices. I stood in the general election of 2005 and am planning to be the Liberal Democrat candidate for Hampstead and Kilburn at the next election – whenever it comes.

My Dad’s concern was pretty simple: why would I want to join a club of such scoundrels, hasn’t the career of politician been devalued and he was concerned that people get caught up in the maelstrom of the noise and the club-atmosphere and accept as the norm what in fact is wrong.

I believe politics is a calling – that the opportunity to represent your area and the people in it is an amazing honour. And there is so much I want to do in my community – so many people who want help, assistance and advice and the office of local MP enables that to happen.

But right now it feels like the most stupid option available.

I understand that when you are elected to represent your area and yet the office is in London then you need somewhere to stay. I understand that mortgage payments work out cheaper than hotel payments, that the cost of maintaining two homes is high. Indeed when I currently go out of London to work work pays for the hotel and I get a meal allowance each day. But the distinction is that I don’t own the hotel at the end of it!

In 1997 when several Labour candidates were elected in the tide of change there were a few low level muttered comments about some people having to take career changes unexpectedly and by association pay cuts. But what none of us fully twigged was that in fact whilst salaries for MPs were reasonable for London and indeed high by the national average, the real income was disguised by the practise of allowances and claims.

My Dad has joked in the past that at least if I was elected I would become wealthy. My response has always been that the salary was good but not on the scale of the city, that I wouldn’t be employing relatives to do no work (I won’t employ relatives at all) and that it was huge role with serious responsibilities.

Having become politically active in the Thatcher years I had always assumed that the wealth that appeared to flow to some MPs came from previous business interests and subsequent board-room appointments – it’s clear that was the case. But it’s also clear that the expenses regime has been a cover as well and that reform is long overdue.

So I’m going to be ringing my Dad back. I’ll tell him about the attempts at reform, I’ll talk to him about Sarah Teather MP and Norman Baker MP, I’ll seek to reassure him that if elected I’ll seek to do what they do – what they think what is right rather than what they are allowed to do by the rules. The House of Commons has been a club with the rules established by the two old parties – I’m a liberal, I believe in reform, I believe in the power of people and the rights of man, I believe in fairness.

I hope to win, I’m going work hard for the prize – but the prize is not my becoming an MP, the prize is my chance to help the area I live in and assist the people I would represent. I hope that this spectacle of humiliation and disgrace doesn’t damage the calling – democracy matters – at least in this country we can vote scoundrels out and replace them with our own alternative.

Ed Fordham is the Liberal Democrat candidate for Hampstead and Kilburn at the next general election. You can find him on his blog, website, youtube account, twitter account, flickr account, facebook or Newsnight, later this evening.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/14461 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • I hope you talked to your dad before you told the rest of us!

    Ed I have huge admiration for you and like you politics is and should be an admirable profession.

    It needs more people with your thinking (I hesitate at saying more people like you as I am hoping you are unique!)

    Good luck in the campaign ahead

    And tell your dad not to worry so much – there are worst things we could be 😉

    Mark

  • Martin Land 13th May '09 - 9:41pm

    Well, Ed, you’ve made your trough…

  • As Mrs Merton might have put it:
    “What first attracted you to a profession which allowed you to claim £20k+ expenses with loosely regulated and generously interpreted rules” :-)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTinter 6th May - 1:21pm
    Your tuition fee maths does not include changes to the old threshold. Old scheme: 20k/£20pm 25k/57pm 30k/95pm Small, but will continue to decrease for the...
  • User AvatarStephen Campbell 6th May - 1:20pm
    @Ruth Mallon "Stop apologising and be proud of what this party has managed to achieve in government." Yes, don't apologise for the early deaths and...
  • User AvatarSteve Way 6th May - 1:20pm
    @Matthew Huntbach It doesn't help when both Clegg and Cameron have talked about the SNP with potentially 50 seats being "in charge" of the UK...
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 6th May - 1:16pm
    Hugh p6th May '15 - 12:31pm Hugh ... with whichever party has most seats and most votes. Leaving aside the 'and' and the likelihood of...
  • User AvatarRuth 6th May - 1:11pm
    Jenny Barnes, it sounds like you want to keep people poor so that they spend all their extra income, lol! I do see where you...
  • User AvatarTCO 6th May - 1:09pm
    @Matthew Huntbach "People who don’t vote LibDem in what were LibDem-winnable seats tomorrow will mostly be throwing those seats to the Tories. THEY will be...