Opinion: Egypt – time now for the power of votes in ballot boxes

Egyptians have risked, and continue to risk, so much for their future. Back in February, there was jubilation in Tahrir Square, at the ousting of President Mubarak after forty years of autocratic rule. There was hope for a more democratic future. Nine months on, they are back in Tahrir facing military and police brutality, asking why the ruling military council is denying the people that future.

These are the most sustained protests since Mubarak was ousted. Nearly 40 people have been killed. It is thought that many have been shot dead by the security forces. Many hundreds are injured. There are reports that the military is using a more powerful strain of tear gas that causes unconsciousness and convulsions. Reports on Twitter claim that CR gas is being used, a gas classified as a combat class chemical weapon.

Egypt has not been a happy place for many months. Life under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (Scaf) is in many ways worse than under Mubarak. Since Scaf came into power, nearly 12,000 Egyptians have been thrown in front of military tribunals. 27 protesters, mostly Coptic Christians, were killed last month when the Army drove armoured vehicles into crowds. Bloggers and activists that the military has tried to silence are on hunger strike. There are appalling stories of prisoner abuse in Egyptian jails, with one prisoner tortured to death as punishment for smuggling in a SIM card.

It’s a hard balance for Western countries. Revolutions work best if they are indigenous. But there also needs to be clear and unequivocal international pressure. Egypt’s military has now spelt out now a clear timetable for Presidential elections to take place by next summer. But there is still much further to go. The military has not backed down on military tribunals, used to silence protesters. Its brutality in Tahrir and its heavy-handedness since taking power mean it has lost trust.

The most important thing that can happen now is for next week’s elections to go ahead. The protesters have forced important concessions from the military. Elections next week, drawing on Tunisia’s peaceful and effective parliamentary elections last month, will deliver a democratic reality that will make it even harder for the military to stick around.

The UK government was unequivocal on Libya. We need to be equally hard on Egypt – not to mention Syria. William Hague has said Britain should not take sides and that the military should oversee the promised elections. That now looks likely to happen. But we need to make sure that next week’s elections are not another false dawn. Once the people have voted, the votes need to translate into a democratic, civilian led government. The military cannot linger on.

The crowds in Tahrir have achieved a significant victory this week. The military has not answered all the questions – not by a long way. This is the chance to let the power of democracy speak, and for the dinosaurs from the military to go back to their barracks.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/25989 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Andrew Purches 27th Nov '11 - 10:19pm

    Geoffrey Payne summed the dilemma up well: I would add to his comments a basic fact that is by and large overlooked,or more worryingly,ignored, and this is that democracy and Islam do not mix. In fact,I would go further here and state unequivocally,that I believe that to the majority of followers of this faith,democracy is absolutely Un-Islamic,period.

    For the West,and our leaders in particular,this is a matter that will be largely pushed to one side once Elections have been openly contested. Well,this will unlikely to be the case, and if it is, are we in the West prepared to really support the aspirations of the real winners, the Muslim Brotherhood, who will probably pull the carpet from underneath the feet of the West totally,leaving it with no influence in Pan Arabian matters for generations to come.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 29th Mar - 8:10am
    stuart moran 28th Mar '15 - 10:44pm Can I just ask that if those who wrote the article believe in ‘no controls on immigration’? Stuart,...
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 29th Mar - 8:04am
    Stephen Hesketh 28th Mar '15 - 10:39pm Nick Thornsby 28th Mar ’15 – 8:46pm “And still some rose-tinted-bespectacled Lib Dems yearn for a “progressive coalition”....
  • User AvatarPhilip Thomas 29th Mar - 8:00am
    Probably around the time that "Unionism" stopped meaning "opposition to devolution" and started meaning "opposition to Scottish independence". Home Rule is what we're offering the...
  • User AvatarPhilip Thomas 29th Mar - 7:55am
    @Stuart Moran- of course they don't. The Liberal Democrats were in government last year when the Immigration Act 2014 was passed, arguably (especially when taking...
  • User Avatarexpats 29th Mar - 7:55am
    From reading some of the comments am I to understand that we'll be pushing the story that Labour are planning to be not just more...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 29th Mar - 6:02am
    Please don't say that any policy or political leaning is "in your/our DNA." Politics is not biological or hereditary in any way — and a...
Tue 31st Mar 2015
Sun 5th Apr 2015
Sat 11th Apr 2015
Sun 12th Apr 2015
Sat 25th Apr 2015