Opinion: Egypt – time now for the power of votes in ballot boxes

Egyptians have risked, and continue to risk, so much for their future. Back in February, there was jubilation in Tahrir Square, at the ousting of President Mubarak after forty years of autocratic rule. There was hope for a more democratic future. Nine months on, they are back in Tahrir facing military and police brutality, asking why the ruling military council is denying the people that future.

These are the most sustained protests since Mubarak was ousted. Nearly 40 people have been killed. It is thought that many have been shot dead by the security forces. Many hundreds are injured. There are reports that the military is using a more powerful strain of tear gas that causes unconsciousness and convulsions. Reports on Twitter claim that CR gas is being used, a gas classified as a combat class chemical weapon.

Egypt has not been a happy place for many months. Life under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (Scaf) is in many ways worse than under Mubarak. Since Scaf came into power, nearly 12,000 Egyptians have been thrown in front of military tribunals. 27 protesters, mostly Coptic Christians, were killed last month when the Army drove armoured vehicles into crowds. Bloggers and activists that the military has tried to silence are on hunger strike. There are appalling stories of prisoner abuse in Egyptian jails, with one prisoner tortured to death as punishment for smuggling in a SIM card.

It’s a hard balance for Western countries. Revolutions work best if they are indigenous. But there also needs to be clear and unequivocal international pressure. Egypt’s military has now spelt out now a clear timetable for Presidential elections to take place by next summer. But there is still much further to go. The military has not backed down on military tribunals, used to silence protesters. Its brutality in Tahrir and its heavy-handedness since taking power mean it has lost trust.

The most important thing that can happen now is for next week’s elections to go ahead. The protesters have forced important concessions from the military. Elections next week, drawing on Tunisia’s peaceful and effective parliamentary elections last month, will deliver a democratic reality that will make it even harder for the military to stick around.

The UK government was unequivocal on Libya. We need to be equally hard on Egypt – not to mention Syria. William Hague has said Britain should not take sides and that the military should oversee the promised elections. That now looks likely to happen. But we need to make sure that next week’s elections are not another false dawn. Once the people have voted, the votes need to translate into a democratic, civilian led government. The military cannot linger on.

The crowds in Tahrir have achieved a significant victory this week. The military has not answered all the questions – not by a long way. This is the chance to let the power of democracy speak, and for the dinosaurs from the military to go back to their barracks.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Europe / International and Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/25989 for Twitter and emails.

3 Comments

  • Andrew Purches 27th Nov '11 - 10:19pm

    Geoffrey Payne summed the dilemma up well: I would add to his comments a basic fact that is by and large overlooked,or more worryingly,ignored, and this is that democracy and Islam do not mix. In fact,I would go further here and state unequivocally,that I believe that to the majority of followers of this faith,democracy is absolutely Un-Islamic,period.

    For the West,and our leaders in particular,this is a matter that will be largely pushed to one side once Elections have been openly contested. Well,this will unlikely to be the case, and if it is, are we in the West prepared to really support the aspirations of the real winners, the Muslim Brotherhood, who will probably pull the carpet from underneath the feet of the West totally,leaving it with no influence in Pan Arabian matters for generations to come.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPsi 2nd Sep - 12:14am
    Jayne Mansfield "I agree that scapegoating individuals is not the answer " That is not what any one is proposing. It is holding people accountable...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 2nd Sep - 12:10am
    Hmm, I suppose creditors should price in the fact that people might just walk away from their debt, but when corporate banks seem to be...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 1st Sep - 11:47pm
    Statutory deradicalization probably means that the user of that phrase hasn't got a clue. Which fits given who the user is. However it really is...
  • User AvatarDave Page 1st Sep - 11:45pm
    But sadly, most of the people going to fight for IS are not particularly religious; there's a good piece by Dan Hannan (with whom I...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 1st Sep - 11:42pm
    I need some sort of civil-liberties-stripping crisisometer to keep objective track of the successive pretexts / really, really pressing reasons for taking people's right to...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 1st Sep - 11:41pm
    Mark might be onto something. I emailed the business department about leveraged buy-outs last week, about how people shouldn't be able to buy healthy companies,...