Sarah Ludford writes …Creating EU Data Protection rules that safeguard both privacy and jobs

As those who read this LibDem Voice article by Peter Bradwell of Open Rights group will know, I am currently the ALDE (Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe) group ‘shadow rapporteur’ on the draft EU Data Protection Regulation in the European Parliament.

I was not originally expecting to play a major role on this particular piece of legislation. But when my German FDP colleague Alexander Alvaro unfortunately suffered a serious car accident in February, the ALDE group appointed me as his interim replacement. I unwisely promised a response to Peter’s article ‘soon’! – but the last few months of negotiations have been very demanding. The new Regulation, unlike the existing 1995 EU Directive, will be directly applicable so leaving no room for flexibility in implementation and putting a premium on a clear text.

As a Liberal, I strongly believe that it is possible to have a synthesis of high data protection standards and support for innovation and jobs in the digital and other industries. Indeed, unless citizens and consumers have trust in the online environment businesses and interests like clinical research will not prosper.  My aim in this reform is to strengthen individuals’ rights but doing so in a way which avoids confusing administrative processes with real privacy protection.

The legislative process has not been terribly well-handled. Although there are a lot of good things in the European Commission’s proposal, it is not flawless. It is too rigidly prescriptive in places, and Commissioner Viviane Reding made a headline-grabbing promise of a ‘right to be forgotten’ which could conflict with freedom of expression and academic research. Then the report by the German Green rapporteur Jan Albrecht was far from helpful to the challenge of getting agreement on a line in the European Parliament.

Getting the drafting right is certainly tricky. If we are to take account of different contexts and levels of risk, we have to try to tailor obligations in a workable way to a variety of data ‘controllers’ and ‘processors’, not only Google, Facebook etc but also a huge range of public and private organisations including small firms like high street shops.

I thought Open Rights group and Privacy International completely overreacted to one short letter of mine in the Financial Times which addressed solely the implication of an article that only ‘US tech giants’ were lobbying on the Regulation. I have for instance met the UK Federation of Small Businesses 3 times on the matter and they are very worried about costs.

I do not have space to go into all the details of the negotiations but you can read some of my thoughts in a riposte to a recent interview – which I also reproduce on my website – by the German Green rapporteur Jan Albrecht. He unjustly feeds the thesis that a ‘sellout’ is threatened, and you will see that I do not regard his operating methods as very constructive. The coming months will be even more stressful than the last ones.

* Sarah Ludford is London MEP and the Liberal Democrat European spokeswoman on justice & human rights. She is a leading member of the European Parliament's civil liberties, justice & home affairs committee.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34758 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Susana Hayworth 4th Jun '13 - 3:38pm

    I totally agree with Sarah’s post on this topic! Good for her for challenging the rapporteur!

  • Please retain the “right to be forgotten” in some format. I appreciate that should a right shouldn’t necessarily be absolute – e.g. In the case of “official” government data such as the census, HMRC etc – but there should be no way that private companies should be allowed to retain your data when you want them to delete it. “Freedom of expression” must encompass the freedom of not expressing an opinion and/or retracting it and, no, “academic research” shouldn’t trump that freedom either anymore than “commercial research” should.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarATF 26th Apr - 10:33am
    @Bill le Breton - Miliband has just said excatly what Nick Clegg has done - no deals whatsoever with the SNP. - That message is...
  • User AvatarRC 26th Apr - 10:30am
    The only remotely tolerable outcome for the election is for the Lib Dems to maintain a decent slice of their MPs but for Labour only...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 26th Apr - 10:22am
    Brilliant assessment Sesenco. This really is a battle for our existence.
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 26th Apr - 10:17am
    Adrian PR's scenario looks plausible to me. Assume SNP hold the balance between two more-or-less equal large parties (and Clegg is wrong, it matters not...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 26th Apr - 10:14am
    Paul, the danger here is that we are relying on a campaign about indirect process and not about direct action. The existential threat to ourselves...
  • User AvatarPhyllis 26th Apr - 10:10am
    Glenn "A lot of Lib Dems believe in devolved power, don’t support the renewal of trident and have huge doubts about HS2 so joining the...