Taxpayers’ Alliance: MPs should be bad employers

With all the genuine expenses targets available, you’d have through the Taxpayers’ Alliance would have found a better target than attacking a Plaid MP, Adam Price, for using part of his Parliamentary expenses to pay for his staff to go on training courses.

MPs, rightly, get to employ staff via the expenses schemes. (How else, for example, would an MP deal with the hundreds of letters and emails that many get each day?) If people are being employed to work for MPs, then in return MPs should be good bosses. Part of that involves identifying training needs for their staff and making sure they get that training.

The training Adam Price arrange wasn’t something completely unrelated to this job his staff have to do. If he’d been sending staff off on courses in knitting yogurt or melting chocolate, then fair enough. But the courses were directly relevant, covering topics such as dealing with the media.

So what does the Taxpayers’ Alliance attack amount to? It amounts to saying, “It’s outrageous that MPs are being decent employers! How dare they! We want bad staff!”

Yes, well.

Hat-tip: Peter Black on Freedom Central

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/15428 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Dear Geoffrey. Thats,”When”, not “If”. Hopefully the TPA will be as hard on Tory waste as they have been on Labour waste.

  • Some hope given it is blatently a Tory front

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBill le Breton 21st Dec - 8:29pm
    Tony, the main players in this, Laws, Alexander and Clegg do understand the different ways of defining the deficit, and when some of them and...
  • User AvatarMark S 21st Dec - 8:18pm
    @Richard Dean Retrain to do what though? Some estimates claim that upto 45% of workers will lose their jobs to automation in the next 20...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 21st Dec - 8:13pm
    I know three people who have switched to e-cigs from being heavy smokers. None still smoke. Small sample but 100% success. I am one if...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 21st Dec - 8:01pm
    Thanks Sue S - Dec 20th 5.57pm. I was beginning to think that no one apart from Andrew Ducker had bothered to look at a...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 21st Dec - 7:41pm
    No-one understands the difference between the deficit and the structural deficit (or indeed the cyclical deficit if anyone considers that any more) and as far...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 21st Dec - 7:32pm
    @hireton: there is flexibilty to vary the housing elements of Universal Credit and to create other benefits which will then be added to the benefit...