Taxpayers’ Alliance: MPs should be bad employers

With all the genuine expenses targets available, you’d have through the Taxpayers’ Alliance would have found a better target than attacking a Plaid MP, Adam Price, for using part of his Parliamentary expenses to pay for his staff to go on training courses.

MPs, rightly, get to employ staff via the expenses schemes. (How else, for example, would an MP deal with the hundreds of letters and emails that many get each day?) If people are being employed to work for MPs, then in return MPs should be good bosses. Part of that involves identifying training needs for their staff and making sure they get that training.

The training Adam Price arrange wasn’t something completely unrelated to this job his staff have to do. If he’d been sending staff off on courses in knitting yogurt or melting chocolate, then fair enough. But the courses were directly relevant, covering topics such as dealing with the media.

So what does the Taxpayers’ Alliance attack amount to? It amounts to saying, “It’s outrageous that MPs are being decent employers! How dare they! We want bad staff!”

Yes, well.

Hat-tip: Peter Black on Freedom Central

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Dear Geoffrey. Thats,”When”, not “If”. Hopefully the TPA will be as hard on Tory waste as they have been on Labour waste.

  • Some hope given it is blatently a Tory front

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarChris 24th Feb - 5:22pm
    Martin - my comment arises from frustration regarding the focus placed on the apparent potential of returning from irrelevance via anti-Brexit campaigning. I fundamentally disagree...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 24th Feb - 5:08pm
    There are as many different proposals for Basic Income as proposers, but I will concentrate on three and just consider payments to a single working-age...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 24th Feb - 5:07pm
    In the last paragraph of my review, I included a couple of caveats: " ...and while I am unconvinced that the taxation consequences of Basic...
  • User AvatarBilal 24th Feb - 4:57pm
    It was a disaster for the LibDems in Stoke. Turnout was very low and the Brexit vote was split 3 ways between Lab, Tory and...
  • User Avatarmatt 24th Feb - 4:51pm
    This really infuriates me https://www.gov.uk/government/news/changes-to-personal-independence-payment-regulations "people who cannot carry out a journey because of a visual or cognitive impairment are likely to need more support...
  • User AvatarGreg 24th Feb - 4:45pm
    Ask yourself this question: If the UK scraps its nuclear weapons, will nuclear war in the future be less likely or more likely? Will disarmament...