The Lib Dem 2010 general election campaign: punching above our weight

Much of the focus, understandably enough, has been on Nick Clegg’s TV debates performances boosting the party’s standing. But actually that’s not what has most impressed me about the Lib Dem campaign: it’s been the disciplined professionalism shown by Lib Dem HQ.

Let’s start off with the two key campaign themes … Change that works for you, and Building a fairer Britain. They received a fair amount of derision when they first appeared – and yet they worked, and worked well. (I wonder if we’ll read that in the next issue of Liberator?)

First, by recognising that this would be a ‘change election’. Obvious enough, I know – and yet it’s the Lib Dems who have been seen to most clearly represent change at this election, with the Tories being forced into defending the status quo.

And, secondly, by emphasising the fairness inherent in the Lib Dem manifesto, and showing to former Labour voters that Nick Clegg, Vince Cable and rest of the Lib Dems can be trusted to deliver a progressive agenda.

The four key themes – fair taxes, a fair start for children, a fair and sustainable economy, and fair and clean politics – were memorable, distinctive and coherent. This is especially important stategically given the party’s stated ambition to replace the Labour party as main challengers to the Tories.

Even before Nick’s first TV debate the Lib Dems were polling at 27% according to ICM, unheard of for the party. That’s a tribute to local campaigners up and down the country putting in the legwork. But let’s not underestimate the way the national party has punched supremely above its weight in this campaign, especially considering the financial warchest the Tories have at their disposal.

Just one example: while the Tories’ expensive ‘Cash Gordon’ online campaign imploded in a day, the Lib Dems’ viral Labservative campaign was a huge success that underlined a key election message for the party – that this election was the moment for the public to shake things up, to challenge Labour and the Tories’ 65 years domination of the political scene.

Small wonder that when Populus asked earlier this week which party had enjoyed the best election campaign, the Lib Dems scored 37%, compared with the Tories’ 19% and Labour’s 7%.

And, yes, there was ‘Cleggmania’, too. Nick’s assurance, fluency and confidence throughout the campaign was quite remarkable. It provided the party with a credibility on the national stage it has all too often lacked. Yet in man ways it was simply the natural fulfilment of a robust, invigorating and professional campaign: it wasn’t the exception, it was the rule.

Of course there were mistakes along the way, most notably getting bogged down in hung parliament speculation when the party was riding high in the polls. And of course the party being incessantly smeared in the rightwing press has taken its toll.

Yet one hour from polls closing the Lib Dems are alone in being able to look back with pleasure and some pride on the last four weeks. I don’t know if we’ll get the results we deserve. But the party certainly got the campaign it deserved.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in General Election and Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/19347 for Twitter and emails.

6 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 22nd Sep - 2:51am
    Someone needs to explain to Clegg that devo on demand will increase resentment about democratic inequality and complication.
  • User Avataralec dauncey 21st Sep - 11:57pm
    Federalism demands either an English Parliament or Regional English federal entities. There really does not seem to be a demand for actual 'state' level entities...
  • User AvatarMack (Not a Lib Dem) 21st Sep - 11:52pm
    @simon Hunt I absolutely agree but this issue transcends everything. Cameron' s duplicity over our pledge to the Scottish People has made me ashamed to...
  • User AvatarSimon Hunt 21st Sep - 10:25pm
    Seems a bit rich for a senior Lib Dem to be blaming the 'old parties' for broken promises and a disconnect from Westminster. Paddy may...
  • User AvatarRoland 21st Sep - 9:29pm
    "(1) The three party leaders neglected to get the permission of their parties to do what they did." [Sesenco 21st Sep '14 - 7:18pm] They...
  • User AvatarGlenn 21st Sep - 9:09pm
    David Allen. I've heard variation on the Tories will barnstorm into power if we do this or don't that for years. The fact is they...