The Lib Dem 2010 general election campaign: punching above our weight

Much of the focus, understandably enough, has been on Nick Clegg’s TV debates performances boosting the party’s standing. But actually that’s not what has most impressed me about the Lib Dem campaign: it’s been the disciplined professionalism shown by Lib Dem HQ.

Let’s start off with the two key campaign themes … Change that works for you, and Building a fairer Britain. They received a fair amount of derision when they first appeared – and yet they worked, and worked well. (I wonder if we’ll read that in the next issue of Liberator?)

First, by recognising that this would be a ‘change election’. Obvious enough, I know – and yet it’s the Lib Dems who have been seen to most clearly represent change at this election, with the Tories being forced into defending the status quo.

And, secondly, by emphasising the fairness inherent in the Lib Dem manifesto, and showing to former Labour voters that Nick Clegg, Vince Cable and rest of the Lib Dems can be trusted to deliver a progressive agenda.

The four key themes – fair taxes, a fair start for children, a fair and sustainable economy, and fair and clean politics – were memorable, distinctive and coherent. This is especially important stategically given the party’s stated ambition to replace the Labour party as main challengers to the Tories.

Even before Nick’s first TV debate the Lib Dems were polling at 27% according to ICM, unheard of for the party. That’s a tribute to local campaigners up and down the country putting in the legwork. But let’s not underestimate the way the national party has punched supremely above its weight in this campaign, especially considering the financial warchest the Tories have at their disposal.

Just one example: while the Tories’ expensive ‘Cash Gordon’ online campaign imploded in a day, the Lib Dems’ viral Labservative campaign was a huge success that underlined a key election message for the party – that this election was the moment for the public to shake things up, to challenge Labour and the Tories’ 65 years domination of the political scene.

Small wonder that when Populus asked earlier this week which party had enjoyed the best election campaign, the Lib Dems scored 37%, compared with the Tories’ 19% and Labour’s 7%.

And, yes, there was ‘Cleggmania’, too. Nick’s assurance, fluency and confidence throughout the campaign was quite remarkable. It provided the party with a credibility on the national stage it has all too often lacked. Yet in man ways it was simply the natural fulfilment of a robust, invigorating and professional campaign: it wasn’t the exception, it was the rule.

Of course there were mistakes along the way, most notably getting bogged down in hung parliament speculation when the party was riding high in the polls. And of course the party being incessantly smeared in the rightwing press has taken its toll.

Yet one hour from polls closing the Lib Dems are alone in being able to look back with pleasure and some pride on the last four weeks. I don’t know if we’ll get the results we deserve. But the party certainly got the campaign it deserved.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in General Election and Op-eds.
Advert

6 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 20th Aug - 3:16am
    @ Thomas I don’t like Capital Gains Tax because if you don’t use your yearly tax allowance you lose it; it is a disincentive for...
  • User AvatarNom de Plume 19th Aug - 10:28pm
    @Yeovil Yokel It depends what he meant by "liberal" in this context. Liberalism does not mean an absence of laws - that is anarchy. Perhaps...
  • User AvatarYeovil Yokel 19th Aug - 9:18pm
    Very good opening speech by Vince, delivered without notes. At one point whilst answering questions he said that he'd altered his view on the role...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 19th Aug - 8:26pm
    @Joe Bourke, There's plenty I could say in reply - like that we shouldn't be quite so accommodating- but I think we've moved too far...
  • User AvatarDavid Becket 19th Aug - 7:34pm
    This is a poorly written motion that is going to make us a laughing stock. Yes we should restate our commitment to the EU, but...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 19th Aug - 7:34pm
    @ Julian Heather. My comments were addressed to David Evershed about the issue of pot holes in Buckinghamshire - and not to the good work...