Andrew Stunell MP writes… Tackling empty homes is shaping up to be a Coalition success story

As some of you will no doubt be aware, last week was National Empty Homes week. It managed to garner a lot more attention than normal thanks to a week of action from the Empty Homes Agency, who worked together with Channel 4 presenter George Clarke on a series of programmes that focussed on tackling the housing crisis, and in particular on empty homes.

George’s campaign is a welcome one, and comes at an important time. I regularly describe the number of empty homes we have in the UK as a national scandal. We have enough long-term vacant properties to build a city the size of Sheffield and still have thousands left over. Housing waiting lists soared under Labour, and millions of families are waiting to get a home of their own. The solution to this problem is not only to build more homes, but to ensure that we’re using the ones that we have already as well.

Liberal Democrats realised this long ago. At the 2010 General Election, we were the only party that had a clear and credible plan for tackling empty homes in our manifesto. Ensuring that the government had the policies in place to really get to grips with this problem has been one of my top priorities in the Coalition.

The only measure of note to have been introduced under Labour to deal with empty homes were Empty Dwelling Management Orders (EDMOs), which allowed Local Authorities to take over the management of long term empty properties. Though a useful stick to encourage landlords to bring these properties back into use, as of November 2010, only 40 had been implemented. It was clear to me that we needed new incentives and extra funding to really get on top of the problem.

The first way we’ve done that is through the New Homes Bonus. I pushed hard within government to ensure that empty homes brought back into use would be eligible for reward through this scheme. We’ve just announced the allocations for year two of the scheme, which included a payout of £19 million to councils for bringing empty homes back into use. Feedback from the ground suggests that councils are now thinking a lot harder about what they can do to bring empties back into use. Lib Dem-run Bristol, for example recently announced plans to bring back 400 empty homes a year.

We’re also consulting on changes to council tax that will help matters considerably. We’re proposing to scrap the mandatory six month discount, replacing it instead with a flexibility to offer a discount of between 0% and 100% – allowing councils to charge full council tax if they want to. There will still be some exemptions in place – such as in the event of the death of the owner, or if the owner has moved to give or receive personal care – but councils will be given much more freedom to manage their housing stock, and remove the incentive to keep homes empty. Further still, the Coalition is pursuing the Lib Dem policy of an Empty Homes Premium that would give councils the option to charge up to an extra 50% on council tax on any home that has been empty for two years or more. This will provide an extra weapon in a council’s armoury, and will act as an additional spur to landlords to bring their homes back into use. The consultation on these changes to council tax is still open, and I would strongly urge Liberal Democrats everywhere to support these measures.

But we recognise it’s not just about tools and incentives, cash needs to be available as well. That’s why I secured a £100m Empty Homes Fund as part of the CSR statement, designed to bring thousands of empty homes back into use as social housing, with Councils and Community Groups able to bid for a share of the money to get things going. In the Autumn Statement, we also secured a further £50m of funding to tackle areas where there are high concentrations of empty homes in a neighbourhood. Many of these concentrations are in the North, a legacy of the failed regeneration projects that Labour pursued. Our intention is that we will work with local partners to secure match funding for this money, and I will be announcing more details of how the funds can be accessed in the New Year.

So we’ve done quite a lot to provide incentives, support and extra funding to bring empty homes back into use. But the crucial test is – will it work? Early indications show our policies are having a good effect. Last Thursday, on a visit with Ian Swales to an empty home in Redcar that has recently been brought back into use, I announced the latest official figures for empty homes in England. They’re going in the right direction, with 21,000 fewer long term empty properties than twelve months ago. That leaves us with a total of 279,000 long term empties, a seven-year low. That’s still too many. But with campaigns like George Clarke’s raising awareness of the problem, and the extra money and incentives from government to help make it happen, I’m confident that we will see even more progress in the years to come.

Andrew Stunell is the Lib Dem Communities Minister, with Responsibility for Empty Homes policy.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/26186 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

8 Comments

  • A simple incentive to encourage empty homes to be brought back into use is to remove the 20% government subsidy on new build. This would also have the benefit of raising tax revenues which could be used to provide assistance to those bona fida UK nationals who are in need.

  • Tony Greaves 13th Dec '11 - 10:50pm

    What is this 20% subsidy on new homes?

    EDMOs are a (Labour government) flop. A good idea (which had real input from LDs in this area (Pendle) and others) it was rendered almost useless due to the Labour government caving in to landlord organisations when working out the details (in the regulations).

    Tony Greaves

  • Peter Chegwyn 14th Dec '11 - 12:01am

    When will the Government tackle the scandal of empty Government and MoD-owned housing?

    In my constituency (Gosport) there are several hundred perfectly good, brick-built, family-sized MoD homes which have been left empty and boarded-up for over a year now.

    What a shocking waste of housing. Some of the 2300+ families on Gosport’s waiting lists would love the chance to occupy such properties so why is the MoD allowed to leave them empty and decaying when they could be used to house homeless families? It’s a disgrace!

  • LondonLiberal 14th Dec '11 - 6:01pm

    Well said, Tom Papworth. While few would be against bringing back empty homes into use, the problem is that many (most?) are empty because they are in in places where people do not want to live – a clue as to why they’e empty!

    Try building some homes people can actually afford. Mr Stunnell. They’re called council homes, in case you’d forgotten.

  • I hope these new policies and incentives work. It is nice to see a modicum of common sense being applied to a big issue. I hope the administration of the funds and policies etc. will also use some common sense to get people into decent housing at a sensible cost to the taxpayer. George Clarke’s campaign started by sharing the ridiculous price the government pays to house people in inadequate housing while streets of houses are boarded up rotting. As a private sector worker, with real concerns over how her taxes are being wasted by this government and the last one, I want the government to shop around and get value for their, no scratch that MY, money.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBelinda Brooks-Gordo 22nd Dec - 12:32pm
    As someone who is passionate about diversity I am grateful to Caron for such a useful piece. I find Helena Morrissey's follow up on the...
  • User AvatarColin 22nd Dec - 11:59am
    Alex Salmond is preparing to do a Charles Kennedy. He will be the public face of SNP at Westminster, the one who has time to...
  • User AvatarNeil Sandison 22nd Dec - 11:56am
    Theakes David 1 We missed our window of oppertunity for leadership challenge some months ago and those MPs have sealed their own fate with the...
  • User AvatarTony Dawson 22nd Dec - 11:34am
    @Tony Rowan-Wicks: " think we all know that the losses the party will receive at the GE will be written off as the price to...
  • User AvatarDavid Faggiani 22nd Dec - 11:28am
    RIP Jeremy Thorpe. Also: http://olddoctorwho.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/five-doctors-doctor-who.jpg
  • User Avatarmalc 22nd Dec - 10:59am
    RC Lord Ashcroft's poll certainly makes Sutton and Cheam look a safe bet for the LibDems. William Hill have it 4/5 a LibDem victory, 10/11...