Business as usual for Labour – burying bad news

Liberal Democrats
Embargo: Immediate, Thursday 10th May 2007


The Government was today accused of breaking the law in an attempt to bury bad news after waiting until the day of Tony Blair’s resignation to publish a report on ID cards that reveals the cost of the project has gone up by £640m since October

The Government had previously refused to publish the report despite the fact that it was breaking the law by doing so.

Section 37 of The Identity Cards Act says that a report on the costs of ID Cards must be put before Parliament every six months. However, the Government has ignored that deadline, which would have seen the report published on 9th April.

Commenting, Liberal Democrat Shadow Home Secretary, Nick Clegg MP said:

“It is bad enough that the Government seeks to bury bad news behind the camouflage of Tony Blair’s announcement.

“Breaking the law to do so breaks new ground even for Tony Blair’s Labour Party.

“This bad news has been illegally postponed, and is only now published a full month beyond the statutory deadline. That shows the depths of cynicism and media manipulation to which ministers are now resorting to ram this increasingly unpopular scheme through.

“To add insult to injury, the statement itself is a laughable cocktail of statistical sophistry and contradictory claims.

“But beyond the smoke and mirrors, one simple statistic remains: the total cost of the ID card project by the Government’s own admission has gone up by £640m since October. The costs are now spiralling out of control. On the grounds of expense alone, the Government should do us all a favour and abandon this great white elephant before it is too late.”


Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.


  • So, if it’s illegal, then why isn’t Clegg taking legal advice to launch a prosecution?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarHuw Dawson 1st Dec - 12:40pm
    I will be very proud of our MPs if we vote no to the Syria bombing. Our suite of questions is entirely fair, and this...
  • User AvatarNick Coates 1st Dec - 12:40pm
    I agree
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 1st Dec - 12:32pm
    The 'recruiting sargeant' argument was strong for Iraq 2, but I think it is much weaker today. Iraq didn't have WMDs. The Taliban training camp...
  • User Avatarpetermartin2001 1st Dec - 12:29pm
    Geoff, Is there any academic backing for this idea of "debt-free money"? It makes much more sense (at least to me) to consider that all...
  • User AvatarGlenn 1st Dec - 12:04pm
    Manfrang. might I suggest the Pan Arab movement was mostly aligned with Russia and thirty years ago we and America were not destabilising states in...
  • User AvatarSadie Smith 1st Dec - 12:00pm
    I,too hope there is a vote against. I am sure it is more complex than Cameron believes. I had hoped for a bit more time...