LDV survey: What Lib Dem members actually think about a hung Parliament

Today’s BBC2 Daily Politics is touting a highly misleading poll by ComRes feigning to know which of the other two main parties – Labour or the Tories – Lib Dem members would wish to shack up with in the event of a hung Parliament where the party holds the balance of power. The Guardian reports it here:

Liberal Democrat activists would overwhelmingly prefer their party to enter a coalition government with Labour rather than the Tories, according to a poll published today. Fewer than one in five said that they would want to see Nick Clegg team up with the Conservatives in the event of a hung Parliament after the next general election. The Lib Dem leader has consistently refused to discuss who he is likely to support if all parties fail to secure an outright majority.

Why do I call the poll misleading? Well, here’s the precise wording ComRes used: In the event of a hung parliament at the next election, and if the Liberal Democrats held the balance of power, which party would you prefer the Liberal Democrats to support in government? And here are the options that were presented: Conservative / Labour / Don’t know / Not stated.

You see the flaw in ComRes’s findings? That’s right, no option for either ‘Neither’, nor for ‘Either, equally’. The omission of those options may account for the very high level of those saying ‘Don’t know’ – almost 50%.

Fortunately, Lib Dem Voice and the ippr – in preparation for Tuesday’s lunchtime fringe event on ‘The end of politics as we know it‘ – asked our panel of 1,000+ Lib Dem party members a question about ‘hung Parliaments’ which offered these options. Some 250 party members completed the survey, and the results differ quite significantly from the false, forced choice question asked by ComRes for BBC2’s Daily Politics.

LDV asked: If the result of the next general election is that the Lib Dems hold the balance of power in a ‘hung parliament’, what do you think should be the party’s response if Labour/Conservatives offer some form of deal which includes the promise of a referendum on electoral reform?

And here’s what our LDV party members’ panel said:

25% – Steer well clear of any form of negotiations or coalition with Labour or Conservatives
5% – Be ready to negotiate only with Labour on that basis
6% – Be ready to negotiate only with the Conservatives on that basis
61% – Be equally ready to negotiate with either Labour or the Conservatives on that basis
3% – Don’t know / No opinion

These findings are, I think, much more revealing of what Lib Dem members actually think the party should consider in the (unlikely) event of a hung Parliament:

  • A significant minority – one-quarter – of party members who replied said the Lib Dems should avoid any form of negotiation with either party.
  • Only a very small proportion, just over one-in-ten, believe the Lib Dems should enter into any form of negotiations exclusively with only one of the two main parties.
  • A clear majority, getting on for two-thirds of party members, believe we should be prepared to negiotiate with either party, so long as electoral reform is on the agenda.
  • Of course this answer doesn’t suit the media’s simplistic, pre-determined agenda, so don’t expect the findings to be reported. But perhaps BBC2’s Daily Politics will have the courage to prove our cynicism wrong …

    Read more by or more about .
    This entry was posted in LDV Members poll.
    Advert

    5 Comments

    • Jessica Ashman 21st Sep '09 - 3:23pm

      So the lib dems would do a deal with anyone as long as the was a promise to rig the voteing system.

    • LondonStatto 21st Sep '09 - 6:21pm

      That’s not a flaw – it’s a feature. It’s a deliberate forced choice.

      When forced to choose (as the parliamentary LDs will be in the event of a hung parliament) LibDem members chose to support Labour over the Tories by two to one.

      You’d really better hope that news doesn’t take hold in the southwest of England and other LD-Con marginals.

    • @LondonStatto

      The choice to negotiate with both or neither will also be an option in the scenario you describe.

    • LondonSlatto – the Lib Dems were “forced to choose” between the SNP and Labour in Scotland in 2007. They chose neither – which is a valid choice.

    One Trackback

    Post a Comment

    Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

    If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

    To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

    Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *
    Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

    Advert



    Recent Comments

    • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 26th Sep - 1:50am
      @John King Thanks for the comment. I've changed the page to take out the links to the "fringe of the conference" tweet, as that was...
    • User AvatarPaul Walter 25th Sep - 11:39pm
      Agreed about LBJ, Hywel. One of his big strengths was gaining votes in Congress for his bills, by hook or by crook.
    • User AvatarPaul Walter 25th Sep - 11:35pm
      Thanks Lorenzo - from October 1st, I'll be posting some more about things I noticed on my tour of the USA.
    • User AvatarFiona 25th Sep - 10:58pm
      At risk of stating the obvious, Uber has a lot going for it, or it wouldn't be popular, but they have been asked, repeatedly, to...
    • User Avatarfrankie 25th Sep - 10:56pm
      It looks like poor David will be sent home again to do his homework. I can't work out if he fails to do it hoping...
    • User AvatarOnceALibDem 25th Sep - 10:54pm
      I don't see why political parties should be able to keep (what is after all sensitive data) on people in perpetuity. There is also an...