Category Archives: LDVUSA

Obama v. McCain: judge for yourselves

At last we have a US general election match-up: Senator Barack Obama (Dem., Illinois) versus Senator John McCain (Rep., Arizona). They both spoke at rallies last night after the Sen. Obama’s victory was finally confirmed, and their speeches indicate the very real differences between the candidates.

It’s not just between their rhetorical styles (though if I was Sen. McCain, I’d fire my speech-writer. Mind you, if I was his speech-writer , I’d fire Sen. McCain, who can’t deliver a speech to save his life).

Nor is it just about the size of the crowds gathered to see them (though the generosity of Sen. Obama’s crowd when he spoke of Hillary Clinton sharply contrasted with the boos which Sen. McCain’s crowd direct at Sen. Obama).

There is a sharp contrast between the two candidates’ personalities and approaches. It’s going to be a fascinating contest, and I’ll nail my colours to the mast now: Sen. Obama will, I believe, emerge the victor.

Anyway, see what you think of the candidates’ speeches:

Sen. Barack Obama

Sen. John McCain

1 Comment

US house prices fall sharply again

A quick update on my previous post, “How bad will the credit crunch get?“: the May figures for the Case-Shiller house price index featured in that graph are out, and they are down again. The index now stands at 186.06, compared to 226.29 at its peak in June 2006 and with 200.76 in December 2007. US house prices are now at the lowest level since September 2004.

Leave a comment

US electoral fact of the day

If the Democrat primaries were being run on first past the post (rather than allocating delegates in proportion to the votes won by the different Presidential candidates), then Hillary Clinton would now be the Democrat nominee for President, despite having won fewer votes overall.

4 Comments

The other significant American election news

Most of the coverage in the UK of American elections in the last couple of days has focused on Hillary Clinton’s latest primary victory and then John Edwards’s endorsement of Barack Obama.

However, also of significance is the special election (by-election) win chalked up by the Democrats in a formerly solidly Republican Mississipi congressional seat. George W Bush carried the district with more than 60% of the vote in 2004, but in this week’s election Democrat Travis Childers won through. This makes it three special election victories for the Democrats in a month – all in strongly Republican areas – and …

4 Comments

Compose Dubya’s epitaph, and win a book!

Lib Dem Voice has an advance copy of a new book, Hijacking America, to give away to one lucky reader (courtesy of its publishers, Polity Press).

Written by Susan George, a well-known political scientist who used to work for Greenpeace, Hijacking America is billed as “fascinating, thorough and often chilling account of the decades-long transformation of American society and political culture.”

It’s available to buy from this Friday – but you can be sent one before then by entering our competition.

But, hurry, you have just one day – entries must be received by 1pm tomorrow, Tuesday, 13th May.

To win a copy, we want you to come up with a one-line epitaph for George W. Bush’s presidency. It can be funny, it can be sage, it can be harsh – entirely up to you. The Lib Dem Voice collective will choose their favourite: it’s entirely subjective, I’m afraid, and our decision is of course final.

Please do ensure you leave a correct contact email in the thread with your entry, otherwise we have no way of contacting you to ask for your address so you can receive your victor’s spoils.

Here’s the full book blurb for you to find out more.

18 Comments

Hillary’s ‘What Ifs’

There’s a fascinating article in the New York Magazine, Ten ‘What Ifs’ About Hillary Clinton’s Campaign – you can read it here. Here’s No. 9 on the list:

9. What if Clinton had gone magnanimous on Obama and the Reverend Wright?
The GOP strategist Alex Castellanos offers an intriguing theory about how Hillary might have reacted differently, and more effectively, to the issue that threatened to swallow Obama. “After the Reverend Wright controversy, Obama was suffering the worst press month of his campaign,” he says. “Hillary had a choice. She could have gotten bigger, more presidential, less political; she could have

2 Comments

Hillary’s lost – but will she concede?

The results of the Democratic primaries in Indiana and North Carolina look certain to end Senator Hillary Clinton’s 2008 bid for the White House: Senator Barack Obama is now the presumptive nominee of his party.

Though Clinton won ‘blue-collar’ Indiana, the wafer-thin 51%-49% margin severely undermines her claim that only she can appeal to the voters who will likely decide this November’s general election match-up with the Republican’s Senator John McCain. That Obama cruised to victory in North Carolina by a larger-than-expected 14% will serve to pile further pressure on Clinton to withdraw her candidacy imminently and gracefully to allow …

12 Comments

What will convince Hillary to drop out?

After a turbulent couple of weeks for Senator Barack Obama’s campaign, things are starting to look up – he has been tested and emerged relatively unscathed from the inflammatory comments of his turbulent Pastor, Jeremiah Wright.

At least as importantly, the US media is beginning to focus on how unlikely it is that Senator Hillary Clinton might ultimately triumph, with the ruling out of Florida and Michigan ballot re-runs, and the acceptance that Democratic superdelegates must not over-rule the popular choice.

Here’s David Brooks in today’s New York Times:

Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects continue to dim. The door is closing.

5 Comments

Obama’s speech on race

Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama’s speech confronting the issues of race at stake in the USA has dominated the nation’s news coverage in the last day. USA Today gives a flavour:

On USATODAY.com, an article about Obama’s speech attracted 7,502 comments by 2:30 a.m. ET today, the most for a single story. The previous high for comments on a single story (5,517) was an article about Obama defeating Hillary Rodham Clinton in the Feb. 19 Wisconsin and Hawaii nominating contests, according to USA TODAY research. By late Tuesday, Obama’s speech was the most-viewed video on MSNBC.com, the second-most viewed story on websites for ABC, CBS and CNN.

You can watch the speech in full here:

10 Comments

Liberals: criminally insane

So says an American psychiatrist in his latest book The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, sadly only available in the United States.

“Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded,” says Dr. Lyle Rossiter.

For a full, unbiased review, see the scary World Net Daily.

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by the two major candidates for the Democratic Party presidential nomination can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

Sometimes I’m really glad British politics hasn’t …

Also posted in Books | 7 Comments

What if we all voted?

Jeremy Hardy, on this week’s News Quiz called the American elections 2008 for John McCain, but as a commentor on a thread last week asked

What if we all voted?

If you fill in your choice of vote, and give your age and sex, the site takes you through to the results so far. Fewer than 600 people have had their say so far, with one candidate overwhelmingly in the lead.

1 Comment

Mitt’s out for the count

So Mitt Romney is the latest US presidential candidate to bite the dust.

Many will argue that his besting by John McCain in California, together with his failure to see off conservative rival Mike Huckabee in the southern states, on Super Tuesday finished off his hopes.

But it seems much more likely to The Voice that Gov. Romney read the writing on the wall when he saw that only two Lib Dem Voice readers out of over 300 had so far voted for him in our US Presidential poll (see right-hand column)…

1 Comment

When videos go viral

It was YouTube’s top video for the weekend, and has been the talk of the political blogosphere today: a musical remix of Barack Obama’s “Yes We Can” speech from New Hampshire, featuring will.i.am of the Black Eyed Peas, Scarlett Johansson, rapper Common, Kareem Abdul Jabar, John Legend, Herbie Hancock, and a host of other celebrity supporters.

Obama-inclined as I am, I’m afraid it does nothing for me. Perhaps it’s the overtones of Bob the Builder’s theme-song; or perhaps it’s that I want to listen to Obama’s rhetoric not will.i.am’s rhyme. You’re far better off watching the speech on which it …

Also posted in Online politics | 6 Comments

Super Tuesday: straws in the wind

Mitt Romney won yesterday’s low profile Maine caucus. (No Democrat contest.)

In those states where at least one poll has taken place post-Iowa, McCain is ahead in thirteen, Romney in just two. On the Democrat side, it is thirteen-three in Clinton’s favour over Obama. For both Romney and Obama one of the states they are leading in is their home state. (Data from pollster.com).

A (near) knock-out result is more likely on the Republican than Democrat side when more than half of the US goes to the polls on Tuesday, as the Republicans have “winner-takes-all” primary election rules. On the Democrat side generally more …

3 Comments

NEW POLL: who do you want to be the next President of the USA?

And then there were four… As we approach Super Tuesday on 5th February, when over 20 states vote in their primaries, it’s clear there are two two-horse races for the Democrat and Republican presidential nominations. So when better than now to ask: who would you prefer to see occupy the White House in a year’s time?

Here are your four choices:

Sen. Hillary Clinton (Dem)
Sen. John McCain (GOP)
Sen. Barack Obama (Dem)
Gov. Mitt Romney (GOP)

Eyes right to cast your ballot. If you want a helping hand, there are a couple of quizzes you can take to …

Also posted in Voice polls | 14 Comments

Florida and South Carolina results: what do they mean?

John McCain: another win confirms his comback and gives him a chance as we head towards Super Tuesday, where 22 states coast-to-coast are up for grabs. His campaign still looks to be struggling to have the financial and organisational strength to fight on that much large stage, but he’s had an excellent run in with a series of victories giving his campaign a major boost.

Mitt Romney: his campaign will be disappointed to lose to McCain by a small margin – again – but will be hoping that a few early loses will be swept away into the curiosity corner of …

15 Comments

Vice President Oprah

In this not-altogether-serious clip from Letterman, Barack Obama gives his top ten campaign priorities.

And the top promise? Not just the a black person at the very top of America’s political system, but in news sure to depress John Edwards, he’d put Oprah Winfrey on the second rung down.

Leave a comment

Edwards tanks Nevada

Since I (somewhat arbitrarily) declared for John Edwards a few days ago, I’ve been following his press release feed.

JohnEdwards.com

What fascinates us Brits about the US elections is that they’re sort of the same as here, but at the same time, completely different.

3 Comments

Handy tips for manipulation of photographs, no.94

If you’re going to manipulate a photograph for political use, have a better excuse ready than this.

Hat tip: Hywel Morgan

1 Comment

Michigan results condensed

Romney wins in Republican contest, giving him two wins so far (Michigan, and the low-profile Wyoming contest) to second-placed McCain’s one (New Hampshire) and third-placed Huckabee’s one (Iowa), who finished third. Net result? Republican contest is still wide open. Next up – South Carolina primary and Nevada caucus on Saturday. South Carolina is being seen as much the more important of the two and is where McCain’s 2000 presidential bid got derailed. This time it is probably Huckabee who faces the bigger risk because, after his initial dramatic win in Iowa, he hasn’t got close to winning again.

On the Democrat side, …

Also posted in News | 5 Comments

Next up in the US elections: Michigan

Tuesday brings Michigan’s primaries, which will be a bit odd as most of the top Democrat candidates aren’t on the ballot paper. Why?

9 Comments

Opinion: America – a sense of proportion?

The American Primaries are in full swing, and the race is on for the next President of the United States who will be, as the journos will constantly remind us, the most powerful person in the world. Assuming of course the Chinese Government doesn’t call in the mortgage!

As soon as a few middle-class, middle-aged Americans attend a few meetings somewhere out in the plains, in a state few of us have heard of and even fewer have visited, our press are fascinated. As are our chatting classes and the webocracy.

But where is the sense of proportion? Last year, France, our …

Also posted in Op-eds | 12 Comments

How did Clinton pull it off in New Hampshire?

The answer may well be: by bucking the male political pundit stereotype of how a Presidential candidate should act.

Peering through the New Hampshire entrails is likely to go on for some time, and throw up more evidence as time goes on (particularly when the pollsters who were predicting a large Obama win starting trying to figure out where they went wrong), but the early signs are that a strong Clinton showing amongst women who made up their minds in the last few days of the campaign was key to her victory.

What could have caused her to do well amongst this …

18 Comments

New Hampshire: will it be Obama and McCain’s night? (UPDATED)

The polls are pointing to triumphs for Democrat presidential hopeful Barack Obama, and his Republican counterpart, John McCain, in today’s New Hampshire primary.

The final Reuters/C_SPAN/Zogby tracking poll shows Obama widening his lead over Hillary Clinton to 13 points, 42% to 29%, with John Edwards at 17%.

For the Republicans, McCain has also pulled away from Mitt Romney, taking a 36% to 27% lead, followed by Mike Huckabee at 10%, and Rudy Giuliani and Ron Paul both at 9%.

Turnout looks likely to be huge – an estimated 500,000 have cast their votes, up from the record of 396,000 set in 2000. …

3 Comments

Would Lib Dems be happy with a Democrat President’s foreign policy?

I think it’s safe to guess that there aren’t many Liberal Democrats who are fans of George W Bush’s foreign policy, whether it is on Iraq, international action on climate change or a host of lower-profile issues. However, would a victory by either Clinton or Obama bring about a US foreign policy that Liberal Democrats would be more comfortable with?

Saturday night’s New Hampshire debate saw both of the leading Democrat candidates espouse foreign policy views likely to be highly controversial. Obama repeated his support (previously criticised by Lib Dem MP Lynne Featherstone) for unilateral military action against parts of …

7 Comments

US election news

1. Romney has won the very low profile Wyoming caucuses.  The Democrat contest is at a later date. The Republican contest was brought forward to between Iowa and New Hampshire in an attempt to get more attention paid to Wyoming. Although Wyoming got a deluge of direct mail from Republican candidates, there were hardly any campaign visits and there’s been very little media coverage, even of the result. But hey – they have managed to get a mention on this blog out of it 🙂

2. Latest New Hampshire polls:

  • Suffolk University has Clinton 36, Obama 29, Edwards 13 / Romney 30,

3 Comments

Something they probably forgot to tell you about New Hampshire

The New Hampshire primary, which is coming up next week, is given huge importance in the US political process. There’s no doubt that it makes for great drama and a ready flow of enjoyable political anecdotes. But does it all matter?

What’s almost never mentioned is that the majority of winners of open contests don’t go on to be their party’s candidate for president. (By “open” I mean a contest without an incumbent President or Vice-President, which is what both the Republican and Democrat contests are this year).

Here are the details: for the Democrats: in 1984 Mondale lost to Hart, in 1988 Dukakis …

5 Comments

Does it matter who won in Iowa?

Here’s the form book:

On the Democrat side, the previous three winners all went on to be their party’s nominee. It’s five out of seven overall since 1980.

On the Republican side, the previous four winners all went on to be their party’s nominee, and again it’s five out of seven since 1980.

If you look at only those contests where there was no incumbent President or Vice-President standing (as was the case yesterday for both sides), then the Iowa winner went on to be their party’s nominee four out of seven times overall: Reagan lost in 1980 to HW Bush, Dole won in …

Tagged | 6 Comments

What does Iowa mean?

With the numbers crunched from the overnight caucus in Iowa, Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee have emerged to win their respective caucuses. Can Hillary still come back to win? How will Huckabee’s win impact the Republican race? The most active discussion of the ramifications is over at Mike Smithson’s Political Betting.

Leave a comment

LDVUSA: All eyes on Iowa

It’s become a cliche for journalists writing about the contest to succeed George Bush that this is the longest Presidential race in history. Some of the politicians aspiring to win their party’s candidacy for the November general election have been fighting, literally, for years. As they seek the support of delegates in selection meetings across the 50 states, the 2008 hopefuls are held to a tighter and earlier calendar than ever before. States have begun competing to move their contests forward, all hoping to increase their national influence. This is the first article in our LDVUSA series – covering the American contest – and will hopefully be a bit of an introduction for those who’ve not followed a presidential race before.

In two days, we’ll have the first real vote of the race. I say vote – but the fascinating thing about the caucuses in Iowa is the fact that they’re not votes in any traditional sense. The selection meetings, held in each county in small halls or people’s homes, are very much live action events. To begin with, you have to arrive at the venue exactly between 6.30pm and 7pm. Any later, and you can’t participate. People then actually stand in a corner to support a particular candidate; it’s a very public affair. There’s no secret ballots, and no postal voting. If you don’t make it on time, you don’t get a voice. Here’s Joe Trippi (Howard Dean’s 2004 manager and a consultant to John Edwards this time) describing the first caucus he witnessed, when working for Ted Kennedy’s insurgent challenge to Jimmy Carter:

The night of my first caucus, in January 1980, I went to Jimmy Hogan’s house at 6.30pm, and watched his neighbours pull up in their pickup trucks and American sedans. Jimmy’s living room was packed. When it came time to call for the vote, the two sides began moving to opposite corners of the room, an old flickering chandalier demarking the line between them. I watched the people move to their corners, doing the math in my head. It was close; a few votes either way could turn it. And just as they were about to start counting

Also posted in Op-eds | 10 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Wrigley
    I think Kira Collins is wrong. When Jo Grimond was leader he wrote an article in the Observer (I think it was in the very first edition of their weekend Magazi...
  • Mick Taylor
    It is NOT a review of policy. It's a review of strategy, under section 5.1 of the constitution. We have enough policy to fill the British Library. The problems ...
  • expats
    @ Tom Walker, “Economic decline, Conservative austerity and misguided government policy have all been blamed for worsening inequality in the UK”.... Our ...
  • Matt (Bristol)
    I think your left/centre-left 'anti-system' bloc still breaks down into activists who are 'recognise the spirit of the system, just want it to work better and b...
  • Matt (Bristol)
    I mean ... 'radical' is an attractive to many people across the centre-left of politics, but your 'radical' is my 'unprove / unwise leap in the dark' and many m...