Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Redirecting the funds to the jobs Britain cannot do without (Edward Marsh)
-
Israel and the West Bank (Andy Daer)
-
Getting ready for Conference – Directory now out (Caron Lindsay)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: The Mecca Agreement (Tom Arms)
-
The climate change dilemma facing Burnham
-
The Joy of Six 1563
-
Dr Who or Terminator
-
Olly Lambert's The Devil in the Family: The Fall of Ruby Franke
-
Conference agenda now online
-
GUEST POST Why has the HS2 project been such a disaster?
-
Are food price rises on the horizon?
-
Cystatin-C some thoughts and some references
-
Could water companies put up prices to pay for drought?
Recent Comments
Peter Chambers
> several people having been offered full time jobs that paid more than minimum wage but then refusing the position on the basis they believed they would be ...
Nick Baird
The quoted comparison between welfare income vs work is deceptive, because it assumes that anyone taking a job loses access to *ALL* welfare payments, which oft...
Tim Leunig
Looking forward to seeing lots of you there!...
Tim Leunig
Well said Chloe. If we want more people to do public sector job X, pay people doing that job more. All the evidence is that people look at headline wages, and h...
Jason Connor
To add to Chloe's list hospital porters, phlebotomists, litter pickers and security guards. I am sure there are many others but some occupations have less trade...






Here is a safe prediction: whatever the Leveson report recommends for British journalism, there will be an awful lot of duff arguments rolled out. Despite much of the debate being couched in how important it is for the press to tell the truth and how many difficult judgements there are to make, we’ll hear plenty of simplistic rhetoric based on shonky factual foundations. 














