Category Archives: Op-eds

Gareth Epps reviews manifesto conference

Some 500 Liberal Democrats descended on London on Saturday to help set the agenda for the next General Election manifesto. This was a members’ event, so we won’t give away all the secrets here. The day was varied and well thought through.

Others have covered Nick’s speech, which can be read in full on the party’s website; while it contained little that could be described as genuinely controversial, it did beg a question of how the ‘big idea’ – of the decentralisation of public services – will work in practice. Not surprisingly, this theme was picked up in many of the sessions through the day.

16 Comments

Opinion: Labour miss the point on communities

I spent last week in Westminster, where in the Lords we spent Thursday afternoon debating the Government’s recently published “Action Plan for Community Empowerment”.

It’s hard to know which pair of words is the more depressing “Action Plan” or “Community Empowerment” Their Lordships certainly failed to be either empowered or active. Apart from the mover – my noble Friend Lord Greaves – and the front benches, there were 2 backbench speakers plus one Bishop making his Maiden speech on the subject. There were twice as many speakers for today’s other two debates, on China and on missile defence.

Tagged | 3 Comments

Opinion: the case against new nukes

This week’s announcement by John Hutton of a new generation of nuclear power plants sparked some lively exchanges in the House of Commons. Following my observations, the Secretary of State offered me a bold print version ‘to help me understand it’, and said the best emissions to cut down would be the ones from my mouth! So a good consensual start then…

Given that opinions vary considerably both between parties and within our party about new nuclear, I thought it might be helpful to offer a bit of background to our judgment that new nuclear plants are not what we need …

8 Comments

Opinon: Lib Dems promise houses – and deliver

In 2007, two key milestones were marked in the Vale of White Horse District Council. First, we celebrated the completion of the 1500th affordable home built in the district since the Liberal Democrats took control in 1995. We also celebrated winning a fourth term in office with a thumping majority. Those in the know might suggest that these two milestones were linked.

The Vale’s original housing stock was sold off by the ruling Conservatives in 1995 at a time when housing development in the district was at a standstill because of the Government’s restrictions on investment in new homes and the Council’s own financial constraints. The housing stock was decreasing in size because of Right to Buy, the waiting list was growing and we could do nothing more than reluctantly support the Tory plan to go for large scale voluntary transfer (LSVT) of the housing stock to private social landlords to wipe out the Council’s debts and gain a significant income.

Leave a comment

Opinion: Change needed

As Lynne Featherstone’s article on this site suggested, the Wednesday half hour of Prime Minister’s Questions is simply a mock medieval jousting tournament, appropriate for a mock medieval palace. As an MP, I only had to stand in for the Leader once, but I was a horrified observer for too many years.

For serious scrutiny, and real accountability, the half yearly interrogation of the PM by the Liaison Committee is potentially more valuable, and can still make good television. There the PM has to take questions – without the assistance of Ministerial colleagues or civil servants – for two whole hours, and he doesn’t get the last word. If squirming is your sport, the Liaison Committee is a good place to be a spectator.

Tagged | 2 Comments

Opinion: America – a sense of proportion?

The American Primaries are in full swing, and the race is on for the next President of the United States who will be, as the journos will constantly remind us, the most powerful person in the world. Assuming of course the Chinese Government doesn’t call in the mortgage!

As soon as a few middle-class, middle-aged Americans attend a few meetings somewhere out in the plains, in a state few of us have heard of and even fewer have visited, our press are fascinated. As are our chatting classes and the webocracy.

But where is the sense of proportion? Last year, France, our …

Also posted in LDVUSA | 12 Comments

Opinion: Should we have primaries in Britain?

With the US primary season now in full sway, the question about whether or not UK political parties should hold primaries will inevitably be debated once again. Tory MEP Dan Hannan makes the case for over on the Telegraph Blogs.

In fact, primaries are now practiced in the UK by the Conservative Party, although only in a limited way – it is just one of the ways a Conservative Association may choose to select their candidates and the system more closely resembles a caucus system similar to the one used in Iowa as opposed to a full open primary system in that participants must attend a public meeting in order to vote.

It has had mixed results. Indeed, their much hyped open primary process for selecting their candidate for Mayor of London, which did more closely resemble a full open primary, ended up a bit of a damp squib. Only 20,000 votes cast in total. I don’t know the exact number of Conservative members in London but I would guess that means only 1 vote was cast for every 2 members in the capital. Given that the primary was open to non-members, that hardly looks like a hugely successful exercise in mass-participation.

Why has the Conservative experience been so patchy?

Tagged | 12 Comments

Opinion: Resolutions for 2008; not “first things to do” just things to go on doing

Dear Leader,

1. Remember what you want. A part of that is that following the next general election you want to be Prime Minister; or failing that Leader of the Opposition; or failing that a cabinet minister in a government committed to a worthwhile part of the Lib Dem agenda; or failing that leader of a growing parliamentary party. Let Tweedledum and Tweedledee assert who is going to be the next Prime Minister, but always be clear that you want to be PM.

2. Remember what the party wants.
Much of that is a prospect of real progress towards a more …

5 Comments

What will happen to oil prices?

This is the first of a regular series of columns from economist Tim Leuning.

January is the time for predictions. Every year economists make them. Sometimes we are right, and sometimes wrong. Some predictions, like inflation, are easy, but others are not. The oil price is not.

For fifty years, 1921-71, the oil price was fairly stable at c. $20 a barrel (in today’s terms). That was surprising: the price yo-yoed in the mid-nineteenth century and was fairly volatile 1880-1921. But neither the booming 20s nor the great depression, a world war, nor a post-war boom seemed to affect oil prices at all. Oil prices were one thing you just did not have to worry about.

Tagged | 15 Comments

The problem with PMQs

Being a politician I am – not surprisingly – happy to stick up for politics and politicians in general.

I think politics is essential for our country – imagine what a country where government ruled without elections would be like – and I think most (though not quite all!) politicians are in it for decent reasons. I don’t think they’ve got their snouts in the trough (after all, most could easily earn more and work fewer hours outside politics) nor do I think that MPs get ridiculously long holidays (Parliament being “in recess” isn’t the same as being on holiday – conscientious MPs work through recess, researching policy, meeting constituents and so on and on). And I could go on.

Lynne Featherstone at PMQsBut the point at which I draw the line in defending my profession is Prime Minister’s Questions. What an awful testosterone-fuelled bear pit of badly behaved boys (and it is overwhelmingly boys!) that is!

To be more precise – the flaws with PMQs fall under five headings. First, the Prime Minister only very rarely faces any detailed, forensic questioning – because the format makes it far too easy to avoid the question.

Second, too many questions get eaten up by patsy soft questions from the government’s own side. “Would the Prime Minister confirm how wonderful he is?” is only a slight paraphrase – and is a waste of everyone’s time.

Third, the atmosphere and ethos is far too much about verbal strutting and intimidation. Take for example the Labour Party’s response to Gordon Brown’s dodgy first outing at PMQs. It was to ensure that Labour MPs made lots more noise next time round, heckling and shouting down Tory MPs as they rose to ask questions. Can you imagine running a workplace on that basis? Judge a manager but how loudly his or her staff shout and heckle other managers at the weekly staff meeting? Bizarre. Yet this is meant to pass for normal adult behaviour in the Palace of Westminster.

Also posted in PMQs | 41 Comments

Opinion: Multiculturalism, Britishness & Community Cohesion

In the run up to the next general election, Gordon Brown will undoubtedly use one of his favourite themes: Britishness. He will do this as a smokescreen to disguise his own concerns and insecurities that as a Scot he will not receive sufficient support from Middle England. So he will roll out a pseudo debate that will ensure that those of us who are not from a White Anglo Saxon background, will be forced to prove our Britishness. Similar to the constant call for the majority of moderate, law abiding Muslims to constantly condemn terrorism, and demonstrate how we all embrace and celebrate Christmas.

I think its time we as Liberal Democrats, the party that has enshrined in our constitution our belief that we stand for equality, community, and non-conformity, had a serious debate about what we mean by this and how we are developing our policies and beliefs to respond to this debate.

Britain is a multicultural country: this statement was for decades a cause for celebration. Multiculturalism gained popularity in the 1960s. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on London in July 2005, many commentators, including Trevor Philips, then the Chair of the Commission for Racial Equality, called for it to be scrapped. We were told that it was a ‘failed experiment.’ Was it compatible to be from another culture and be British? Questions and articles continue to question this, as to how young British people from ethnic minority communities (with the spotlight more recently on people of Muslim background) were not integrating into British society, despite being British born.

18 Comments

Leader article: 2008 for Liberalism in Wales

2008 is shaping up to be an exciting year for Welsh Liberal Democrats. May’s local government elections will offer a real test of Labour’s unpopularity. The Welsh Liberal Democrats are the main challengers to Labour in all our largest urban areas. While the first-past-the-post system remains in place, we will be pushing to strengthen our position in Cardiff, Swansea, Wrexham and Bridgend – where we already lead the councils. Look out for Newport too, where – if as expected Labour lose overall control of the council – then all of Wales’ cities will have rejected their style of we-know-best politics.

It …

Tagged | Leave a comment

David Cameron is Clegg-lite

Did you notice the almost audible gulping and stuttering from the chattering Tory websites after Ming Campbell’s sudden resignation when it was obvious that Nick Clegg would stand for the leadership? Not to mention their deeply unusual restraint since the leadership election results were announced.

I have a theory about all this and I think it deserves examination.

First of all, let us go back a couple of years.

David Cameron wins their leadership election but – for all his elan in the famous conference speech – Cameron, with his Eton/CCHQ/PR/Hooray Henry background is a recipe …

12 Comments

Opinion: Do the Lib Dems need a gym membership as our New Year’s resolution?

When I sit down and draw up my New Year Resolutions I always think of St Augustine and his prayer “Oh Lord make me Chaste, but not yet”. Resolutions can be affirmative but more often than not we use them to try and break long term habits we don’t like. Even if we don’t last much past January 10th.

As Britain is awash with new gym memberships, nicotine patches and soon abandoned Diets over the next few weeks, are there any long term bad habits the Liberal Democrats could do with breaking? Here are my five suggestions for a fitter, leaner 2008 for the party. However I suspect some are as unlikely as me giving up chips.

6 Comments

LDVUSA: All eyes on Iowa

It’s become a cliche for journalists writing about the contest to succeed George Bush that this is the longest Presidential race in history. Some of the politicians aspiring to win their party’s candidacy for the November general election have been fighting, literally, for years. As they seek the support of delegates in selection meetings across the 50 states, the 2008 hopefuls are held to a tighter and earlier calendar than ever before. States have begun competing to move their contests forward, all hoping to increase their national influence. This is the first article in our LDVUSA series – covering the American contest – and will hopefully be a bit of an introduction for those who’ve not followed a presidential race before.

In two days, we’ll have the first real vote of the race. I say vote – but the fascinating thing about the caucuses in Iowa is the fact that they’re not votes in any traditional sense. The selection meetings, held in each county in small halls or people’s homes, are very much live action events. To begin with, you have to arrive at the venue exactly between 6.30pm and 7pm. Any later, and you can’t participate. People then actually stand in a corner to support a particular candidate; it’s a very public affair. There’s no secret ballots, and no postal voting. If you don’t make it on time, you don’t get a voice. Here’s Joe Trippi (Howard Dean’s 2004 manager and a consultant to John Edwards this time) describing the first caucus he witnessed, when working for Ted Kennedy’s insurgent challenge to Jimmy Carter:

The night of my first caucus, in January 1980, I went to Jimmy Hogan’s house at 6.30pm, and watched his neighbours pull up in their pickup trucks and American sedans. Jimmy’s living room was packed. When it came time to call for the vote, the two sides began moving to opposite corners of the room, an old flickering chandalier demarking the line between them. I watched the people move to their corners, doing the math in my head. It was close; a few votes either way could turn it. And just as they were about to start counting

Also posted in LDVUSA | 10 Comments

A look back at the polls: December

We tend not to be too poll-obsessed here at LDV – of course we look at them, as do all other politico-geeks, but viewed in isolation no one poll will tell you very much beyond what you want to read into it. Looked at over a reasonable time-span and, if there are enough polls, you can see some trends.

Here, in chronological order, are the results of the six polls conducted in December (hat-tip: Anthony Wells’ UK Polling Report Blog, which provides by far the best analysis of the polls on the web):

Tories 39%, Labour 34%, Lib Dems 18% – ICM/Guardian (19th Dec)
Tories 43%, Labour 31%, Lib Dems 16% – YouGov/Telegraph (19th Dec)
Tories 41%, Labour 30%, Lib Dems 16% – ComRes/Independent (16th Dec)
Tories 45%, Labour 32%, Lib Dems 14% – YouGov/Sunday Times (14th Dec)
Tories 40%, Labour 32%, Lib Dems 16% – Populus/Times (9th Dec)
Tories 42%, Labour 35%, Lib Dems 14% – Ipsos-MORI (7th Dec)

Which gives us an average rating for the parties in December as follows (compared with November’s average):
Tories 42% (+2%), Labour 32% (-1%), Lib Dems 16% (n/c)

Back in November, our poll round-up showed Labour plunging 5% following the debacle of the-election-that-never-was. It’s arguable Gordon Brown might be relieved that the bad press of the last month hasn’t resulted in an even sharper downturn than December’s 1% fall. What will concern Labour more is if the polls do not show any significant upturn in the coming few months, as May’s local elections approach. At the moment they seem locked in the 30-35% box where they were contained in the latter months of Tony Blair’s premiership. Six months after the Brown succession, and Labour’s back where they were.

The Tories have had a pretty good December. I commented last month – when the party was unchanged from October’s average of 40% – that “the drop in Labour’s support seems either to have transferred to the Lib Dems or Others, rather than to the official opposition. Again, we’ll have to wait to see if David Cameron is able to capitalise sustainably on Labour’s misfortunes.” The jury’s still out on whether Mr Cameron is building solid, election-winning foundations; but it would be churlish not to acknowledge that his party is gaining some momentum – albeit perhaps by default – in inverse proportion to the rate at which Labour is losing credibility.

The Lib Dems have stabilized since the nadir of October, when our poll average languished at 13%. In truth, we might have hoped to have done slightly better owing both to the fillip of Vince Cable’s impressive turn as acting leader, and the publicity surrounding the party leadership contest. Still, 16% is some kind of base for Nick Clegg to build upon, and does give the lie to those political commentators who still think that two-party politics is due some kind of pendulum-inevitable return. It isn’t. Two-party politics is dead.

Finally, as a Christmas treat, here are the previous December poll averages for the parties over the past decade:

Also posted in Polls | 5 Comments

Opinion: We don’t do God?

As millions of Britons make their annual visit to church and we learn that our new leader, Nick Clegg, “Doesn’t do God” (so to speak), is it time for the Liberal Democrats to rethink their relationship with faith communities?

Liberalism and religion have not always been happy bedfellows. However, even as Richard Dawkins tops the best-seller lists, and we unwrap our gifted George Bush ‘countdown calendars’ this Christmas, I believe we should re-think and embrace our churches, mosques and temples as allies in the liberal cause, albeit for rather different reasons than we usually do. Before I suggest three reasons for this, let’s consider what use our campaigning makes of faith communities at the moment. It’s not always very liberal…

39 Comments

Opinion: What should the new leader do in his first 100 days? #7

Dear Nick,

If you and you staff have the time, I’ve made many comments over the past two months about how the party needs reforming and reorganising.

But that’s not the object of today. I want to talk to you about the most important meeting of your first 100 days. A meeting, of course, that according to its to principle protagonists will not take place. A meeting, we will not be able to read about until one of you publishes your memoirs. I refer to your first meeting with David Cameron.

It’s important that you set out our stall. Point …

Also posted in Leadership Election | Tagged | 4 Comments

Opinion: What should the new leader do in his first 100 days? #6

Five Lib Dems have so far taken up the challenge to tell Nick Clegg what he should do in his first hundred days: Paul Walter, Linda Jack, David Morton, Mary Reid and Mark Valladares. Now we turn to Simon Titley…

The previous contributors to this series have bombarded the new leader with laundry lists of demands without setting out clear, objective criteria for their choices.

And that’s the problem. Everyone will want a piece of Nick Clegg. He will face persistent and conflicting demands from the party, from parliament, from constituents, from the media, from lobbyists, from …

Tagged | 8 Comments

Labour’s swing to puritanism

Since the departure of Blair the most noticeable change in the nature of policy statements and proposals have been on the classic battlegrounds of social liberalism versus social conservatism.

First we had the U-turn on Super Casinos. Then we had the proposals to re-reclassify Cannabis. We now have a suggestion to reverse the liberalisation of the licensing laws including pub opening times. This was followed by suggestions that the Police should be scouring the pubs trying to find drunks. There is the proposal to criminalise bar staff with hefty fines for serving drunken people. We have a criminal justice bill that includes very poorly thought out proposals to ban ‘violent porn’ that include provisions that would effectively criminalise perceived immoral thoughts. You can be in possession of a film that has been passed by the Classification Board but if you view it ‘principally for sexual gratification’ you are committing an offence. And now there is a suggestion by Harriet Harman to make it illegal to pay for sex.

In Brown and Harman we have a nightmare combination – the traditional religious puritan tendencies of Brown and Harriet Harman’s political correctness gone mad. And what makes matters worse is that both have very strong state interventionist tendencies.

24 Comments

Opinion: Councillors Commission report – why it shouldn’t be ignored

The launch of the report of the Councillors Commission earlier this month was largely knocked out of the media by larger news stories, but the report deserves more than to be relegated to a gather dust on a Whitehall shelf.

Before I saw the report it was described to me as “one third brilliant, one third bizarre and one third barmy” – and I wasn’t disappointed. There are some strange ideas in the report – such as the suggestion that Parties should nominate “reserve councillors” to take the place of those elected should a Councillor resign or die in office …

5 Comments

Opinion: What should the new leader do in his first 100 days? #5

We now have a new leader, Nick Clegg. For the last couple of weeks, Lib Dem Voice has been inviting party members to tell us what you think should be his top priorities. Four have so far taken up the challenge: Paul Walter, Linda Jack, David Morton and Mary Reid. Today it’s Mark Valladares’ turn…

So far, the suggestions that have come forward have been focused on what Nick needs to do with regard to the wider world. Don’t think for one moment that this bureaucrat dissents from much of what has been said thus far, but …

Tagged | 5 Comments

Opinion: Why Labour can’t square the circle in Basra

Bob Ainsworth the defence minister had a torrid time on The Today Programme this week. He tried to persuade us that the British troops leaving Iraq today was a “success story”. John Humphreys put to him a quote from the police commander that “They have left me militias, they have left me gangsters, they have left me all the troubles in the world”.

On behalf of the government, Bob had to waffle on in response that “things were not perfect but they are better than before …”. Patently this was not the case, but the pretence had to be maintained in …

Leave a comment

Leader article: United in Europe

Across Europe we have entered the age of drawbridge politics. What do I mean by this? That the dividing line between left and right, which for years divided those favouring a free market economy (generally on the right) from those favouring a planned or social market economy (generally on the left) – and which estranged economic liberals from social liberals though they belong together – is disappearing fast.

Most of the left has now recognised the need for a globally competitive economy and a less costly welfare state, as evidenced in the manifesto of the Party of European Socialists adopted in Oporto in Dec 2006 (though a few have joined the ‘stop the world I wanna get off’ camp). In an almost conciliatory gesture, many on the right now discuss the impact of massive shifts in investment and jobs on desirable and necessary levels of social cohesion. If we are sacrificing some social cohesion for economic dynamism, what happens to what we used to call ‘the common good’? A new social contract, capable of reconciling the competing demands of flexibility and fairness in te post-industrial age, is actively sought.

Their is a new dividing line in politics, however, no less clear than the old left-right division over the management of the economy. It reflects our response to the challenges of globalisation.

Tagged | 6 Comments

Opinion: Now’s your chance, Nick

Dear Nick,

I know you’re knackered, and that you’ve spent the last two months running yourself ragged in this leadership campaign. God knows why. Well, I guess there are 511 reasons why (though it’s mainly ‘cos the party exec reckons leadership campaigns should be run like by-elections, frantically keeping the party four-square in its comfort zone, appealing to its own electorate).

But, whatever the margin, you now have your mandate. You have been democratically elected leader of the Liberal Democrats. Now you must lead.

You must grab the agenda, and make it your own. As Vince Cable has, both with Northern Rock …

Also posted in Leadership Election | 18 Comments

Opinion: What should the new leader do in his first 100 days? #4

We all know that our real power base is in local government. And it is here that some of the most interesting initiatives in community politics are being played out by Lib Dem run councils.

So I want to challenge the new leader to capitalise on our distinctive style of leadership out beyond Westminster.

He could begin by a fact-finding tour of the country, and, guided by local knowledge, align himself with the greenest or most citizen-centric initiatives that have been introduced by our councillors. Each one will be accompanied by a challenge to the other parties to show whether they have …

Also posted in Leadership Election | Tagged | 7 Comments

Leader article: Peer Pressure

A dozen years ago, when I first took my seat in the House of Lords, there were a number of self-deprecating jokes which summed up how the country saw the House of Lords and how it saw itself:

There was the Peer who dreamt he was speaking in the Lords, and when he woke up he was.

There was the Peer who read the Times Obituary column each morning to make sure his name was not there. If it wasn’t he went in.

Thus was this anachronistic, quaintly amusing arm of our governance seen by friend and foe alike. It survived, in …

Tagged and | 3 Comments

Opinion: The ‘V’ Word

The leadership contest has seen much natural agreement and some forced disagreement. One of the issues that confused most onlookers is who was advocating the use of education vouchers. After Chris Huhne repeatedly asked Nick Clegg to deny that he supported ‘US-style vouchers’, Clegg became more and more adamant about his opposition to the idea. Eventually, after its use as a bogeyman had served its purpose, the issue died away. While it was in the spotlight, however, no one seemed to stop and ask, ‘Why shouldn’t liberals advocate vouchers?’

If you do some statistical analysis of PISA results …

33 Comments

Opinion: What should the new leader do in his first 100 days? #3

In less than a week, the Lib Dems will have a new leader – either Nick Clegg or Chris Huhne will have succeeded Ming Campbell. Lib Dem Voice is inviting party members to tell us what you think should be his top priorities. Paul Walter and Linda Jack have both had a go. Today it’s David Morton’s turn…

Paddy Ashdown once said that the first thing a third party leader had to do in the morning “was get noticed.” The media’s love of the two party consensus is well known but very real. As it seems that one slip …

Also posted in Leadership Election | Tagged , , and | 6 Comments

Opinion: Vince Rocks (And So Can You!)

Vince Cable has deservedly won much praise for his recent performance as acting leader of the Liberal Democrats. He has set a high standard for next week’s victor to match. The danger is that we will treat Vince’s performance as an entertaining interlude before normal service is resumed. Instead, we should analyse and understand the generic lessons that the next leader (and other leading Lib Dems) can learn and apply.

There are essentially six things that Vince has got right:

1) Moral clarity – Politics is ultimately about making moral choices. Vince’s statements make it clear that he has a sense of …

Also posted in Leadership Election and PMQs | Tagged | 8 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    "stopping the tech companies harming their users" which should mean regulating the tech companies not the users, i.e. forcing the companies to change their busi...
  • Chris Cory
    While I agree with every word, I am at the same time, more than a little discombobulated. If we believe all this fine "power to the people" stuff, then isn't...
  • Ian
    The way the party runs itself is hardly an exemplar for putting our values into practice, is it? Nor evidence that senior people in the party have much interes...
  • David Allen
    British politics since the 2008 crash has been a contest between establishment Governments and insurgent opponents. The Tory and Labour establishment parties h...
  • Kevin Hawkins
    I have frequently commented on Lib Dem Voice that we should not take one week’s by-election results (or even several week’s results) seriously. We have goo...