Tag Archives: TV licence

20 November 2018 – today’s press releases

Another busy day, but I’m pleased to note that a bit more use is being made of our Spokespeople in the Lords. After all, there are rather more of them than in the Commons, and they’re a valuable asset when it comes to holding the Government to account…

  • Cable: Bank of England must conduct honest assessment of Brexit deal
  • Cable: Govt must block Interpol election of Alexander Prokopchuk
  • Tories to blame for missed NHS targets
  • Cable: Our priority is building the momentum for a People’s Vote
  • Vulnerable people put in homes not fit for human habitation
  • The licence fee is not the Government’s to spend

Cable:

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , , , , and | 4 Comments

Pressing questions on the iPlayer tax

The BBC has announced that, from September 1st, the “iPlayer loophole” will be closed and access to the BBC’s iPlayer will require payment of the licence fee. Of course, there was never a loophole; the licence fee is meant to apply only to live television broadcasts.

Of course, the blame cannot be put at the BBC’s feet. The BBC has been forced to make severe budget cuts leading to the scaling back of services that cost relatively little such as Radio 6 and BBC Three – services disproportionately used by people aged 18-34, while at the same time having to shoulder £750 million per year for concessionary licences for over 75s: the biggest cost to the BBC after BBC One. Indeed, TV Licensing emphasises the disproportionate effect on students, who increasingly exclusively use on-demand services.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 36 Comments

Opinion: Who will be paying if the government drops free over-75s TV licences: the BBC or the over-75s?

 

Tuning in briefly on Sunday to the Andrew Marr Show, appropriately belatedly via the iPlayer, I was amused and appalled in equal measure by what lay ahead (I didn’t actually watch it all, partly out of fear of what I would see, but mainly out of fear of boredom).

I was greatly amused by the format of the program. I’ve got used to listening to the Today program’s political correspondent “cut through the crap” immediately after a political interview, which I like to hear. However, it is a little odd when that correspondent does this before the interview is complete, which seems to have become more common, particularly when the politician doesn’t seem to challenge the interpretations of their spin.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 22 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarfrankie 17th Feb - 1:57am
    Well they won't be flying in drugs on flybmi will they Peter.Tick, tock the consequences of the Brexit vote keep piling up.
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 16th Feb - 10:17pm
    @theakes "It could also be very challenging to Labour and enhance the chance of the breakaway" My gut-feeling is that a breakaway is unlikely while...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 16th Feb - 10:02pm
    Peter Martin, unemployment trebled in the 1970's to 1.5 million under Callaghan, reaching 3m under Thacher until coming back down to around 5% on average...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 16th Feb - 9:57pm
    I do really tire of Peter Martin's continuing attempts to insist we must do this or that. As a Liberal I could never define someone...
  • User AvatarPaul 16th Feb - 9:17pm
    She was part of a regime that threw innocent gay people from high buildings to their deaths. Where is their future?
  • User AvatarWilliam Wallace 16th Feb - 9:14pm
    Londoner: London streets are so jammed under normal conditions that it's quicker to walk. 2 years ago I felt ill in the Palace of Westminster,...