Category Archives: Op-eds

Opinion: BBC beaten by the anti-green lobby

There is meant to be a political consensus in this country. Global warming is taking place, and humans contribute to that. There is also a scientific consensus that this is the case as well, so since we are all agreed, it is surely the case that the BBC can go ahead to what is now the important next step; try to encourage the population of this country to do something about it?

In the same way the BBC encourages us not to commit crime, it is important for our future safety and wellbeing, indeed our survival, that we do not destroy the environment in which we live.

It appears we are not there yet. There is still a powerful anti-green movement in this country. When the BBC announced it was dropping an awareness-raising programme on climate change, only Chris Huhne had the courage to speak out against the decision:

“The consensus about global warming in the science community is now overwhelming, so accusing the BBC of campaigning on such an undisputed threat is like suggesting it should be even-handed between criminals and their victims.”

Why was that? What do Brown and Cameron think? If they both publicly agreed with Huhne, then surely the BBC would have to change its mind?

8 Comments

Opinion: The Lib Dems on tax – progressive, distinctive and popular

The Liberal Democrat conference tax policy motion is based on the report of the Tax Policy Working Group, which I chaired. The Group was established by the Lib Dem Federal Policy Committee after last year’s conference had approved a pretty comprehensive policy covering the principles which we wanted to underpin our tax policy and specific policies to bring these principles to life. We summarised that approach under the heading “fairer, simpler and greener”.

Last year’s policy paper did however leave some issues unresolved. And we also had to respond to the Budget.

The first issue we discussed was property tax. Here we have fleshed out proposals to move from the uniform business rate to site value rating for business property. On domestic property, we reiterated our support for Local Income Tax (LIT) and also propose that, in the longer term, a system of land value taxation should also be introduced.

We looked at simplifying the system and we make three proposals: –

1. We would replace the extremely complicated rules against tax avoidance by introducing a General Anti-avoidance Rule which would make it illegal to structure transactions for the principal purpose of avoiding tax. This would allow us to tear up about 500 pages of tax legislation

2. We would replace the highly complicated system of capital allowances with one based on tax deductible depreciation. This would simplify the system and raise enough revenue to allow us to reduce corporation tax by a further 1%.

3. And we would reduce the size of the tax return for the majority of those whose tax affairs are straightforward – over six million taxpayers – by cutting out all the irrelevant questions. All they would need to complete is a form the size of a postcard.

Also posted in Conference | 10 Comments

Opinion: Nuclear? Not now!

Imagine, for a moment, that the terrifying secrets of nuclear fission did not wait until the wartime dash for knowledge under Robert Oppenheimer. Let’s imagine, instead, that the basis for nuclear energy was developed closer to Einstein’s breakthrough, maybe just before the Great Depression.

Ask yourself, what would the Chamberlain government have done with nuclear energy in the weeks after the outbreak of war, expecting at any time the drone of Nazi bombers? It doesn’t take much imagination. They would have abandoned such tempting and potentially devastating targets, just as they abandoned BBC television because its transmissions could guide bombers.

So how are we to understand the Brown government’s determination to press ahead with a vastly expensive investment in nuclear energy, with all the concomitant transport of plutonium and nuclear waste, at a time when we are supposed to be facing an unprecedented external threat? Are we really facing such a terrorist threat after all? Or is modern government hopelessly in thrall to departmental divisions, to the extent that one department deals with risks and another deals with something else entirely?

7 Comments

Opinion: Talking Coalitions

Some of you may know that I have recently finished authoring a book on coalition governments. I wanted to speak directly to Lib Dem members to explain my conclusions, having spent the best part of the past nine months researching and writing the book, and how and why I have come to them. It’s not easy to explain in a brief article but I hope it goes some way to illuminating why I have come to the view that for our party and the country, we need to be both prepared for and wary of sharing power.

For most of my 18-year career in politics, I have seen such a deal as an exciting prospect. For a third party in a majoritarian electoral system, coalition government is our quickest route to power, and perhaps the only way we will achieve proportional representation. But my study of the history of coalition governments has given me a new insight into coalitions and the myriad pitfalls that accompany them.

Also posted in Books | 16 Comments

Opinion: The nasty party

Last week’s unveiling of a nine foot bronze statue of Nelson Mandela in Parliament Square was a nice way to round off the British summer (such as it was) – a happy occasion to unite black and white, left and right, in honour of the man who emerged with the utmost humility after 27 years imprisonment, to lead South Africa out of the shocking injustice that was the Apartheid era.

Fulsome tributes were paid by Lord Attenborough, Wendy Woods, and the Mayor of London. “The most inspiring and greatest leader of our generation,” said the Prime Minister, “and one of the most courageous and best-loved men of all time.” And everyone cheered and clapped their hands raw. Well, everyone except for Donal Blaney.

In a tired and predictable throwback to Conservative attitudes of the 1980s, Blaney decided that this was a fitting moment to remind us all of a darker side to Mandela. “One must not forget,” he intoned, “that he raised funds for the ANC’s armed wing, arranged paramilitary training, and led an armed struggle against Apartheid. He was no Gandhi.”

This sudden conversion to pacifism will undoubtedly come as a shock to many who are more familiar with Blaney as the last man in Britain who still thinks that the Iraq invasion was a good idea. In a reference to the practice of “necklacing”, a gruesome method of retribution which tragically spread through the townships during the late ’80s, Blaney proposed that, “instead of laying a garland at the feet of Mr Mandela’s statue or about his neck, maybe someone should be placing a rubber tire there instead.” A bit politically incorrect is young Donal – not to mention cynical, ungracious, and crass.

Tagged and | 69 Comments

Opinion: What to do about excess packaging

The media and public clamour surrounding excess packaging is growing. The Women’s Institute and The Independent are both running national campaigns against packaging, while companies like Lush Cosmetics have begun to see the economic sense of letting consumers buy the products they want, without unnecessary cardboard or plastic accompaniment.

The Government has failed to take the lead on curbing excess packaging, paying lip-service to the issue without offering strong, effective policies. The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs’ (DEFRA) Waste Strategy, published in May this year, passed up a golden opportunity to get serious about packaging, merely offering a handful of proposals limited in scope and ambition.

On Wednesday, 19th September (at 9am, for the early birds among you!) I will propose a motion to conference entitled Taking Action to Tackle Excess Packaging (full text below). The measures covered in the motion will set the Liberal Democrats on the front foot in the packaging debate. It combines straightforward solutions with innovative policies to provide a clear, effective approach on preventing excess packaging and reducing packaging overall.

The motion takes steps to strengthen and support Trading Standards offices, with whom the role of policing excess packagers lies. The creation of a new national body, to tackle large-scale producers of excess packaging in conjunction with local Trading Standards offices, is proposed. Some cases of excess packaging may be beyond the scope of regional Trading Standards offices, and in these cases a broader, more strategic, view is appropriate.

Also posted in Conference | Tagged | 3 Comments

Opinion poll round-up: The ‘New Leader Bounce’

You can’t have missed the fevered speculation as to whether Gordon Brown will call an early General Election, just two and a half years into a theoretical five-year term. Though such a gamble sounds absurd, if Mr Brown is considering such a thing it will be for the same reason that the rest of us are wondering: he’s seen the opinion polls.

The so-called ‘Brown Bounce’ appears to have turned round the Tory lead and given Labour the better chance of winning the next election. But how do these sudden opinion poll surges compare with similar situations in the past? And is the past, or are opinion polls, any guide to the future?

You might well be better off with tea leaves and sticking your finger in the air (or through a letterbox), but as you’re reading this for some opinion poll fun, let’s start crunching numbers…

The Liberal Democrats’ ancestry goes back to the 17th Century, but we’ve been going as this party since just 1988. That seems the appropriate point, then, from which to make comparisons – Liberal Democrat poll standing with Liberal Democrat poll standing.

During the lifetime of this party, there have been three new leaders before Mr Brown who’ve immediately turned around their party’s fortunes… And none of them have been ours! So what did the early Britain-wide opinion polls make of John Major (who ended badly), Tony Blair (who ended badly) and David Cameron (who may be starting to end badly)?

John Major

John Major became Leader of the Conservative Party on the 27th November, 1990, and Prime Minister the following day. If politics really does follow patterns, then he sounds like the ideal comparison: the dull, reassuring Chancellor taking over from the proven election-winning superstar who’d started turning the voters off by developing a barking mad messiah complex. Of course, he’d been a top political figure for little more than a year at that point, and in terms of his appeal you could argue he was the mirror image of Tony Blair – both popular because you could more easily imagine them as Leader of their largest competitor party than their own.

However, despite a traumatic and continuing split in the Tory Party over the removal of Mrs Thatcher – perhaps because, unlike the Liberal Democrats, they didn’t have a ‘nice’ image to trash – Mr Major started off with a huge boost. Like Mr Brown, you have to wonder whether this was down to the new leader’s qualities or simply the huge sigh of relief that his predecessor was gone, while Mr Major conversely had a popular war with Iraq to his name.

Whatever the reasons, though, Mr Major had a bounce. In September 1990, the Tories trailed on 36.5%, behind Labour on 46.8%, and the Liberal Democrats – still recovering from our merger blues – were on 9.8%. A month later, Eastbourne saw our first by-election victory, boosting us in the polls to 13.3%, bringing Labour down to 45.9% and sending the Tories into a panic on 33.6%. Mrs Thatcher admitted defeat on the anniversary of President Kennedy’s assassination, 22nd November, and that month’s polls already saw the Tories climbing back to 38.1%.

Once Mr Major was securely in post – well, it looked like it at the time – the December 1990 opinion polls monthly average showed a huge turnaround. Tories on 45.7%, up 7.6% on November; Labour 40.4%, down 4.6%; Lib Dems on 9.1%, down 2.7%. Yes, Mr Kinnock was saying ‘Oh no, we’re doomed’ at a poll rating that would have Mr Cameron crying hallelujah and breaking open the champagne: remember that!

Also posted in Polls | 2 Comments

Opinion: Real solutions to tackle poverty and inequality

This month when the policy paper ‘Freedom from Poverty; Opportunity for All’ goes before the Liberal Democrat federal conference we have the chance as a party to put forward a radical and unique set of proposals to tackle poverty and inequality in the UK.

If we are honest with ourselves this is a challenge which we have not stood up to for too long. While many people within the party have proposed and put into practice polices at a local level, it is now seven years since we have put forward a coherent package to tackle inequality and eradicate poverty.

After 10 years of Labour the time is ripe for us to make ourselves the only party offering genuine solutions to help the 12 million people still living in relative poverty. It is simply unacceptable that in the UK a person’s life chances still are determined more by their parents’ income and employment than in almost any other developed country.

Labour’s attempts to reduce poverty have come at the price of trapping people in dependency, with means-tested benefits. Labour seeks to move people over an arbitrary ‘poverty line’, rather than giving them the real opportunities which would allow them to play their full part in society.

Labour has failed to tackle educational inequalities, failed to get ‘hard to reach’ groups back into employment; failed to deal with the dramatic shortages of affordable housing; and failed to strengthen the pensions and benefits safety net. The Conservatives meanwhile have no sensible policies to deal with poverty and inequality at all. They want to “roll back the state and roll forward society” in a great leap backwards to nineteenth century Victorian conservatism.

It is time for us as a party to wage a new war on poverty, and give people the opportunities to succeed in life. To establish a real meritocracy where, regardless of background, everyone is given the opportunity to acquire the education and skills to succeed. Where the poorest in out society are no longer abandoned to a childhood spent in failing schools followed by a lifetime of form filling to claim means-tested benefits. But if these aspirations are to be more than merely platitudes, if we are to prove ourselves as a party of substance against two parties of spin, we must take difficult choices, and look not only to the state for solutions but also individuals and business.

Also posted in Conference | 7 Comments

Opinion: Why we should condemn the academic boycott of Israel

The University and College Union’s (UCU) proposed academic boycott of Israel has attracted opposition from many people who might usually be numbered among Israel’s harshest critics. The (Palestinian) President of Jerusalem’s Al Quds University is among those opposing the boycott, in a joint statement with the (Israeli) President of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

As a Liberal Democrat, my opposition is rooted in our party’s fundamental liberal belief in free expression, particularly in situations involving conflict resolution.

To boycott Israeli academics, including liberal individuals who strongly disagree with the Israeli government, is not only illiberal, it is also perverse. Imagine a boycott of British universities and academics, based on our government’s disgraceful conduct of the war in Iraq!

Almost worse is the suggestion that Israeli academics might be exempted from a boycott if they distance themselves from their government’s policies. Presumably the proponents of the boycott are planning to summon up the shade of Joe McCarthy to supervise this exercise in thought control?

The proposed boycott is also perverse because it singles out Israel among all the countries of the world. Israel, for all its faults, is a parliamentary democracy. Its universities, like British universities, are open to all citizens, regardless of religion or ethnicity. I have been to the Hebrew University and met Arab students, including some who came from the Palestinian territories, and some who came from Israel itself. There are also many overseas students at Israel’s universities. Israel enjoys the same academic freedom as does this country and other democracies.

The tragic irony of singling out Israel is that no other Middle Eastern country has academic freedom, so why only boycott Israel? When other Middle Eastern countries are infringing human rights in ways that directly affect academic freedom, why is the UCU silent?

Also posted in Conference | Tagged , and | 39 Comments

Opinion: Re-Think Annual Conference

Hull East won’t be represented in Brighton this year. I’m one of our two representatives, but we can’t afford to go, and we’ve never been to an autumn conference. We’ve been to Harrogate for the last three years – just about affordable, and very worthwhile. And we had planned to go to Blackpool two years ago, but my colleague, the driver, was ill, so I had to back out. Much as we would like to go to Brighton, it just isn’t possible when you’re on a low income. Take a look at the train fare, and then add in four …

Also posted in Conference | 33 Comments

A Zero Carbon Britain with the Liberal Democrats

Yesterday the Liberal Democrats launched radical proposals to create a zero-carbon Britain by 2050. Our paper ‘Zero Carbon Britain – Taking a Global Lead’ is the most far-reaching set of proposals on climate change ever championed by a British political party.

This is the first time any party has set out a plan to tackle carbon emissions from every part of the economy: transport, energy, housing, offices and factories.

The green tax switch is a vital part of our programme. We want to reverse the decline in green taxation under Labour. We will use the revenue from higher taxes on gas-guzzling cars …

Also posted in Conference | 9 Comments

Opinion: This is what the Welsh Liberal Democrats are for

In a major new pamphlet, published in full here on Lib Dem Voice, Peter Black, Welsh Assembly member for South Wales West, sets out the challenges and opportunities for the Liberal Democrats in Wales.

The challenge

The outcome of the 2007 Assembly elections was both frustrating and disappointing for the Welsh Liberal Democrats. Despite increasing our vote share in the constituencies, despite fighting a very professional all-Wales campaign, we failed for the second time to increase the size of our Assembly Group past six.

I have no desire to re-open the debate that the party entered into following the election. The outcome of those discussions was that we voted to go into a rainbow coalition with Plaid Cymru and the Tories only to see the Nationalists walk away and sign up to a deal with Labour. There are a few things that need to happen now, firstly the party needs to learn the lessons of the past few months and we need to regroup and then rebuild with the one clear aim of getting our message to the people of Wales.

Our problem last May was our failure to connect with voters. We failed to make it clear to them what it means to be a Welsh Liberal Democrat. We went into the election with a detailed manifesto containing hundreds of radical policies, many of which we shared with the other parties. Although we pulled out three particular policy areas to major on in the election, these issues were not presented clearly or effectively and they turned out to be the same issues that the other parties were promoting as well. We failed to make them relevant or unique to us because we did not relate our positions to the day-to-day experience of ordinary voters. In other words we did not use our manifesto as a campaigning tool.

One reason for that omission is that we have spent too long mistaking our activity in the hallowed corridors of the Assembly for campaigning. Whilst the work we do in the Assembly is important, for a political party it can never be a substitute for honest groundwork and visible local community involvement. In many cases we did not get out into communities to deliver our message to voters. That has not been universal, because in those areas where we did work and where we did have a localised message that resonated with people, our vote not only held up but in some cases dramatically increased. It was the rest of Wales, the vast majority of communities where that did not happen.

In this respect we could learn a lot from Plaid Cymru. Our elected Parliamentarians and Assembly Members should be taking a lead, getting out onto the streets with other activists to talk and listen to people about their concerns and ideas. We should be using the real experience of our constituents and framing our policies in a way that they can identify with. In other words we need to put into practice on a national level what is at the heart of Welsh Liberal Democrat philosophy, devolution, localisation, community empowerment, real, genuine interaction with communities.

At a UK level we have a distinctive agenda based on civil liberties, freedom and the environment. Although we have tried to carry that agenda over into a Welsh context as yet we have failed to make an impact.

11 Comments

OPINION: 3 Leaders back to back – and we lose. Badly.

This recess period is a good chance for Liberal Democrat members, those in other parties and the general public to view the presentations and speeches made recently by all three party leaders, back to back.

BBC Parliament are showing Brown, Cameron and Campbell back-to-back as part of their rolling programme during the recess. This represents a good opportunity for us to take a deep breath and a step back, and to “see it as others do” – or might – not least as it rolls around at different times, on average three times every two days.

The coverage of Ming is not drawn from our finest hour. It was the post early-joining-the-Brown-Government-or-at-least-some-of them-thought-they-were moment ; the frustrated agony following the apparent shock approach to Ashdown; and Brown’s coronation and (actually fairly quiet) unveiling of a fairly astonishing Tory convert (they’re welcome to him.)

44 Comments

Tim Garden: An Appreciation

You would expect someone with the titles Marshal of the Royal Airforce, Professor, the Lord Garden to be, at the very least, a little self important if not down right pompous. I had not met Tim Garden before Charles Kennedy nominated him for a place in the House of Lords in 2004. So I was not prepared to meet so fully a paid up member of the human race. My sense of humour can veer towards the schoolboy, so calling one of the highest ranking officers in the Royal Airforce “Biggles” could have tried the patience of lesser men. But …

Also posted in News | Tagged | 1 Comment

OPINION: Fib Dems? A compliment!

It was well over 10 days into the Sedgefield By-election. Things seemed to be going well and it was clear that the Conservatives were in 3rd place. Then again – Sedgefield is further North than Watford so it was no surprise!

One thing was missing and the campaign team knew it.

High quality literature was being produced and delivered. Canvassing showed a move towards Greg Stone and the Lib Dems. Even the Northern media were on board. Then it came…

Tagged | 30 Comments

New Statesman Talks Up Ming Assassins

The New Statesman this week carries an editorial by the Labour-supporting Mirror’s Rosa Prince, attacking Ming. Her analysis – tarring Ming with failure alongside David Cameron’s – is less remarkable than the gossip she offers on the higher eschelons of the party:

Many had hoped last month’s Ealing Southall by-election would provide the magic bullet … One prominent Lib Dem MP, returning from campaigning in Ealing, arrived at an eve-of-poll summer party thrown by a leading party member exclaiming: “F*** – it looks like we might win this thing now.” He was consoled by several frontbenchers, at least two

Also posted in Parliamentary by-elections | Tagged | 12 Comments

OPINION: Corruption is Corruption is Corruption

Imagine you’ve been burgled and (by a small miracle!) someone is up in court, charged with the burglary. How impressed would you be if the accused said, “OK, I did do it – but you have to understand. I’m a poor student at the local university and all the French and US students there steal things too, so it wouldn’t be fair if I was left out and had to make do without the proceeds of crime too?” Not very I think! But that’s pretty much the excuse so often rolled out to brush away corruption around international arms deals – everyone else gives out bribes you know, and it would be so unfair and unforgivable if we didn’t too.

So – despite the allegations involving huge sums of money and numerous senior people – both Labour and the Conservatives have been happy for the corruption investigation around the Al Yamamah arms deal with Saudi Arabia to be dropped. And it’s the only area of crime (other than graffiti!) where – when campaigning against it – I’ve encountered a handful of people saying, “but it’s ok”.

Well – I beg to differ on several counts!

Tagged and | Leave a comment

OPINION: An Elephant’s Voice

Millennium Elephant, a 2006 finalist in Lib Dem Blogger of the Year, has written exclusively for Lib Dem Voice on the state of politics today.

Hello! That nice Mr Lord Deputy Lord Mayor Lord Stephen has asked me to write a special diary for his august organ. This is a PUN… because it is AUGUST!

I think that I should begin by explaining, for any readers who have not already read my famous Fluffy Diary. My name is Millennium Dome and I live in the East End of London. Obviously, I am a white elephant. I am seven years old because I am the same age as the Millennium !

Mr Lord Deputy Stephen has asked me to explain to him about POLITICS, and I can understand why he is confused! It is VERY complicated!

Tagged and | 5 Comments

Opinion: A Brighter Euro-Vision?

Next year all of Wales and much of England go to the polls for local elections. If there hasn’t already been one before then, there may well be a general election too. With all this electoral excitement ahead it would be easy, and in many people’s eyes, preferable, to not think about that looming cloud that is the 2009 European elections.

Let’s face it, we haven’t had a great deal to celebrate in European elections in the past. In our first ever round Euros as the Liberal Democrats we polled a record low for a national election – just 6.2% and less than half the tally of the Green Party. Its not got much better since either. Our 16% in 1994 was our peak and last time around we came fourth again – stumbling home behind the UKIP.

But there are reasons to be optimistic for 2009. In 2004 our vote actually went up on the 1999 figures, and since then we have had a series of good results each year. We are in a far stronger position than we were in 1999 and are polling consistently higher than we did those 8 long years ago.

13 Comments

Ming China

Liberal England’s Jonathan Calder points Lib Dems to the article by leader Sir Menzies Campbell on the Beijing Olympics in the Grauniad.

Mr. Calder thinks it’s a bit weak, and judging by the user comments most of the paper’s website readers agree. Personally, I’m surprised that Ming did not use his new ‘spikiness’ to take a stronger line. Freer markets must be aided in making lives freer for people in communist state.

Tagged and | 5 Comments

Opinion: How the Republicans are trying to win the 2008 presidential election

A prominent Republican lawyer is trying to put a ballot to the vote in California which would mean the presidential votes of California in 2008 would distributed by district rather than by state. This would practically destroy the Democrats’ chances of an easy victory, and give the Republicans approximately an extra 20 votes (the same as the state of Ohio).

For anyone not familliar with the strange workings of American politics this is because, in a general presidential election, it is not the candidate who gets the most votes who wins the election, but who gets the most states. …

17 Comments

Hillary and Dave: separated at re-birth?

Andrew Sullivan draws some interesting parallels, in today’s Sunday Times, between the dilemmas facing US Democratic Presidential hopeful Senator Hillary Clinton, and Tory leader David Cameron:

Cameron has a Hillary problem. Hillary Clinton learnt the hard way what it is to be a Democrat in a Republican era, just as Cameron has had to learn how to be a Tory in a new Labour era. Every time you open your mouth, you fear your opponents will corner you into the old liberal or Tory stereotype.

So you play relentlessly against type, and hedge yourself aggressively against critics, and aim for

3 Comments

Opinion: Save the Local Post Office – Why?

I know, I know, it’s shooting at Bambi, but I confess I just don’t get the Lib Dems’ Post Office Campaigns.

I don’t mean by this that I have a rabid desire to close every post office in the country, or even that I don’t accept the case that, in some locations, like remote rural communities, they are useful, loved and necessary. It’s more that I can’t think of many campaigns I’m less likely to get out of bed for than this one.

The problem I have is that, while I accept petitions to save local public services, rather like campaigns in favour of orphans and chocolate, are effective short-term publicity, I didn’t really get into politics simply to aggregate target data for our EARS database.

I have the inconvenient belief that campaigning should be for either some meaningful positive change or to stop something bad happening. I can’t fit most post office campaigns into either of those boxes. My contention is that often these campaigns are trivial, and make us in the long-run look trivial and parochial by association.

As an example, a recent urban Liberal Democrat ‘Save our Post Office’ petition amounted to little more than opposition to the hypothetical chance of the service moving from a physical post office building to the counters at WH Smith. A campaign that implied the burning political issue was that customer service in one of the UK’s more successful retailers might not be as good as that provided by the commercially unviable alternative. Evidence for this dull fear-mongering was notable only for its absence.

Another issue is that, bar a handful of delays and reverses, the campaign clearly isn’t working. Governments have been closing post offices at a rate of 300 a year for two decades despite opposition by Liberal Democrats, Sun readers and viral campaign songs.

And while anti-post office closure campaigners may be able to produce the occasional 4-million signature petition, it is not evidently top of mind as a criteria for voting outside local elections – although even here we are somewhat short of actual evidence as to where PO campaigns rank amongst the main drivers of local voting preference.

17 Comments

Opinion: How the Lib Dems should win the next election

In the light of the fantastic tailspin the Tories are currently in, is it too ambitious to seek to position the Lib Dems as THE opposition?

Lib Dem blogger ‘Cicero’ comments that we have an impressive array of policies, a clear philosophical underpinning, and a positive glut of sensible debates raging at any time. Armed with these powerful weapons, we could enter the next, febrile period leading up to the election by stating clearly that there is only one party which can claim to be an alternative to Labour, and setting out in annoyingly clear soundbites just why that is.

So …

12 Comments

Opinion: What Brown should be saying to Bush

Recently Lib Dem leader Ming Campbell commented on three things that Gordon Brown should be saying to George Bush;

“There are three things which should be on Gordon Brown’s agenda when he meets President Bush: renegotiation of the one-sided extradition treaty; the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention centre; and a negotiated withdrawal of British forces from Iraq.

“These should be the objective of a candid friend. The excessively subordinated relationship between the President and Mr Blair should be put to bed.”

I agree wholeheartedly with all three. The problem is – as Lib Dems will well remember from Harrogate, when Ming offered Brown “5 tests” – that if you list things out loud then what is not included becomes just as important.

Four obvious omissions are:

Tagged | 4 Comments

Opinion: Serious politics RIP?

I know it’s the summer silly season, but the quality of political reporting in the British media appears to have sunk below even its customary July nadir.

As a partisan Lib Dem, I’m quite content for the ‘feral beasts’ to decide now’s the moment to stick it to Tory leader David Cameron. He has, for far too long, been given a free ride by London-centric journalists for whom Dave’s emetic brand of frappe-lite politics makes easy copy. Rarely daring to venture beyond received opinion – or the M25 – the British commentariat has garlanded Mr Cameron as politics’ answer to David Beckham.

But now the beast is bored, and Mr Cameron is just sooo, like, last month. Our new Prime Minister, the oh-so-serious Gordon Brown, is the new flavour of the month. Throw in a couple of dodgy by-election results for the Tories, and a few indiscreet criticisms from some malcontents, and the media has all it needs to justify a wallow in some shallow speculation.

To judge from his peevish performance on BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme this morning (juicily dissected by Alex Wilcock here) Mr Cameron is feeling this summer heat. He needn’t worry so much: next month it’ll be someone else’s turn.

Oh, it’s all such larks! Who’s up, who’s down; who’s hot, who’s not; who’s in, who’s out. That’s the full extent of the media’s interest in politics.

6 Comments

Opinion: A Decade On

Duncan Borrowman departed from Lib Dem HQ last Friday after almost a decade. As he left, Lib Dem Voice asked him to look both ways, backward and forward.

I joined the Lib Dem campaigns department in February 1998, having previously been the organiser in Orpington. I was part-time to begin with, as was Neil Fawcett, who started on the same day. Over the following years I covered London and various other neighbouring bits – mainly Eastern Region – before moving to the newly created post of National Campaigns Officer.

The total Campaigns Department staff, including Chris Rennard, was eight full-time equivalents …

Tagged | 3 Comments

Opinion: The myth of classical liberalism

‘To give is Liberality,
In him that shuns two contraries;
The one is prodigality,
The other hateful avarice.’

Cervantes – Don Quixote, the 2nd part, 1614

I have been pondering a while over how to approach this subject. And, although I have only just got back from hospital, I feel that I am now ready to deal with this most troubling matter. I wish to discuss a phenomenon, one which used to relate only to America, that seems to have spread (or, perhaps I am wrong, and simply showing my young age) to our country.

My curiosity was sparked earlier when I asked a good friend why he was a Conservative. He replied that he believed that there needed to be order in our country (or ‘society’, as any non-Thatcherite would have put it). An interesting and fine response, especially since this colleague was not simply a Conservative foot soldier, or someone who would simply vote Conservative, but also happened to be an incredibly intelligent man; and one who not only truly believed in the ideas of Conservatism and Thatcherism but understood them also.

He also later told me one thing that got me started along this thread of thought, that he believed himself to be a ‘classical liberal’. His version of the word ‘liberal’ certainly did not correspond to mine.

I have heard many other non-progressive thinkers describe themselves with this word – for example Friedrich Hayek (an Austrian aristocrat who once described altruism and ideology as irrelevant), Milton Friedman, and, of course, Mrs Thatcher herself (two people who both supported Augusto Pinochet’s dictatorship).

There seems to me to be something fundamentally wrong about the assertion that these people are indeed ‘classical liberals’, and not just because a lot of the people who assert that they are classical liberals are in fact incredibly authoritarian.

45 Comments

Opinion: The agony, then the ecstasy

Three months ago, there was a real sense of excitement in the Welsh Lib Dems. We were poised to make big gains in the third elections to the National Assembly, held on 3rd May.

The evident frustration of four years previously, in 2003, when we had stagnated on six seats out of 60 was sure to vanish this time, we thought, with the potential to win three or four extra seats in the Senedd. But, in what was a heart-breaking night for the party in Wales, we missed out on even one extra seat yet again.

Inevitably, the resulting frustration and anger, not to mention the carnage over coalition negotiations that followed, has led to the party wondering exactly where it is that we can go from here.

Much has been made of the need to reposition ourselves in Wales, to speak up, and show exactly what it is that we stand for. In my view, events outside the party have presented us with a golden opportunity to show what we are for.

Last week, Labour and Plaid Cymru finalised their coalition government, with Plaid gaining three cabinet seats. Many old-fashioned socialists have rejoiced at the prospect of what they see as a red-flagged paradise run from Cardiff Bay. They cheer at the prospect of policies free from Blairism, Brownism and Alun Michaelism. For them, Rhodri Morgan and Ieuan Wyn Jones will lead Wales into a socialist century that they have long dreamed of. However, what is clear to me is that this is a government that is doomed to fail the people of Wales.

As a liberal, and a Liberal Democrat, my natural distrust of nationalists has so far been proved correct.

5 Comments

Opinion: Three cheers for ‘bomb proof’ Lib Dems

It is nice for us LibDems to be heading towards our holidays with a bit of a spring in our step, due to a couple of reasonably sanguine by-election results.

We do have reason for confidence in the long-term due to robust structures in our party which mean we are “bomb proof” in three areas where the Tories have just received three direct hits.

Firstly, there is candidate selection.

We have a local selection process bolstered by independent returning officers. The process is sacrosanct. No Lib Dem leader is going to override it. If they did, there would be mayhem. The leader would be found hanging upside down from a lamppost in Cowley Street with his sandals stuffed into his mouth.

In sharp contrast, David Cameron overrode the Conservative candidate selection process at the Ealing Southall by-election, with shattering consequences for his reputation and that of his party.

Secondly, there is the policy-making process.

Again, the LibDem policy-making process is laid down in concrete in vast detail. Those of us who have attended conferences know that the debate and voting process is painstakingly democratic. For those of us who have tried getting to speak or proposing a motion at conference, we know that it is not a process which can be hijacked.

Tagged | 52 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Catherine Royce
    Congratulations Tim, I'm sure you deserve it, (to be one rather than to be abolished) but its an interesting point. Can you lead a revolt from the inside? -do w...
  • Peter Davies
    Healy is now saying that any pensioner with only a state pension will not have to pay tax. Presumably, if your bank pays you 6p interest on your current account...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    One of my team works 25 hours a week. Five years ago she paid no income tax. Now it is over £650 a year. Her pay rises mostly just covered rising prices (infla...
  • Keith Creswell
    “A nurse pays more on her earnings than a landlord pays on his gains, and no liberal should be comfortable defending that.” Is a sentiment I think we all ca...
  • expatsj
    Jeff 23rd Jul '26 - 9:14pm........It increases the incentive for them to work more hours, seek promotion or get a better paid job on which they will still pay n...