Category Archives: Op-eds

Britain must crush Musk

What should our democracy do when a very rich man encourages violence on our streets?

That’s the question that Britain faces today with Elon Musk’s recent behaviour.

Traditionally, this hasn’t been a problem. While media tycoons like Rupert Murdoch had influence, they did not provoke criminality. They didn’t call for violence on the streets. They didn’t transfer cash to criminals. And their companies didn’t openly flout the law.

Today things have changed. A few weeks ago, Elon Musk spoke to a nationalist march in London calling for a dissolution of Parliament, and going on to say:

My message is to them: if this continues, that violence is going to come to you, you will have no choice. You’re in a fundamental situation here. Whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you die, that’s the truth, I think.

There is no reasonable doubt that this was Elon Musk calling for violence on Britain’s streets. Ignoring this is to ignore our ears.

And if he had said this on the stage in Westminster, rather than beaming in from America, it is possible that Musk would have been arrested for encouraging violence.

Yet the British government did virtually nothing in response. A few days later the Prime Minster complained, but didn’t go as far as taking action.

This isn’t just a one off.

Last week, Elon Musk revealed that he was bankrolling Tommy Robinson, an extremist with a string of criminal convictions

And, as British Future’s Sunder Katwala has amply documented, Twitter continues to allow extreme racism, and effectively refuses to enforce the law against racist abuse.

The British government can’t let this keep happening. If we allow a foreign billionaire to encourage law breaking, it could lead to deaths on our streets.

Tagged , and | 1 Comment

We have to be our best selves to fight Reform: that means Prue for President

Prue Bray standing next to logo Prue for PresidentIn a few months’ time, members in Wales will be facing a massive test; a test we have proven we can manage at local government, but have yet to prove at a Parliamentary level. How do we respond to the rise of Reform? How do we put our best foot forward and be the Liberal anti-authoritarian alternative to the populist right?

It is through that lens with which I am viewing our Presidential election. It is important now more than ever that we have a strong voice for Liberalism, pushing the party to be our best selves and come out fighting with our values. We need a President who will promote these values, bringing with them decades of experience in local government, and the structures of our party. To do this, we need to make sure our party is fighting fit and in the best place to fight each election that comes our way during this Parliament.

The strength of our party has always come from the way we engage our membership and having known Prue since I was in the Young Liberals, I know she understands the strengths our membership brings, as our party’s secret weapon. Her willingness to help people engage in the party, and harness people’s enthusiasm is what we need in a President, especially when the role is so critical to running our large, and often complicated organisation.

Tagged , and | Leave a comment

When barbarism knocks on your door: why the Taliban must be confronted, not tolerated

I can’t watch what’s happening on the Pakistan–Afghanistan border without feeling both anger and heartbreak. Anger at the Taliban a barbaric force that has dragged an entire nation back to the Middle Ages and heartbreak for the innocent people who will pay the price of yet another war they didn’t start.

It’s 2025, yet in Afghanistan, women are being treated worse than cattle. The Taliban’s idea of governance is to lock women indoors and call it “virtue.” They’ve banned girls from secondary school and university, stopped women from working, and ordered that no woman can travel without a male guardian. In July this year, dozens of young women were arrested in Kabul for wearing colourful clothes. Their so-called “vice police” humiliate and beat them for what they wear. The United Nations calls this gender apartheid and it’s hard to argue with that.

Nearly eight out of ten young Afghan women are excluded from education, jobs, or training. Hospitals are turning away female patients who come alone. Pregnant women die because they’re not allowed to travel without a man.

And now this tyranny is spilling over into Pakistan. In October 2025, heavy fighting broke out along the frontier in Kurram and Chaman. Pakistan says 23 of its soldiers were killed when Taliban-linked fighters attacked border posts. The Taliban claim they’ve killed 58 Pakistanis in return. Whatever the truth, one thing is certain civilians are dying on both sides.

Markets have shut. Villages are emptying. Families are fleeing through the night. Those who can’t escape huddle in their homes, praying the next shell doesn’t land on them.

But I understand why Pakistan has lost its patience. For years, militants based in Afghanistan particularly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) have terrorised Pakistani towns and cities. I’ll never forget the images from Peshawar in 2014, when 132 schoolchildren were murdered by the TTP. Or the mosque bombing in 2023 that killed 84 police officers during prayer. Just a few months ago, in June 2025, a suicide bomber in Mir Ali killed 16 soldiers and injured dozens more. Pakistan’s critics often forget: this is a country that’s buried tens of thousands of its own citizens because of terrorism.

But I’ll be honest Pakistan helped create this monster too. Back in the 1980s and 1990s, its generals thought they could use the Taliban as “strategic depth” against India. They armed them, trained them, and looked the other way as extremists spread. Western governments, including our own, played along during the Cold War. We all did this. And now, the same monster we fed has turned on its maker.

Also posted in Europe / International | Tagged , and | 1 Comment

Campaigning is not a burden

Stephen Harte out delivering in the sunshineAs the Scottish Lib Dems prepare on gather for Autumn Conference in Glasgow on Saturday, we have a long campaigning slog ahead of us…..a Holyrood General Election May 2026 and then straight into preparing for the five yearly Council elections in May 2027.  And we will be campaigning hard to gain seats in both!

That may sound daunting but I’m sure I’m not alone in actually looking forward to it.  I joined the party in my late teens (during the merger debate) because I actually want to campaign for a better world. I’d rather do that than sit at home being depressed and frustrated by the mess unfolding around us. And it’s great exercise!

One thing I have noticed is the campaigning burden on our hard working MPs, MSPs and Councillors. They each have a job of work to do to serve their constituents and campaigning comes on top of that. And many of them (especially local councillors) see themselves as the fallback to fill all the delivery gaps they can’t find other folk to volunteer for.

This is neither fair nor realistic if we want our elected folk to deliver for their constituents and not have them burn out in the process!

When it comes to campaigning activities, an elected person is no different from any other   Lib Dem activist. We do it for the party and our shared mission to created a better society – locally and beyond. We should never see campaigning as a favour to the MP, MSP, councillor or candidate.

So, fellow Lib Dems, could we agree the following:

Tagged and | 2 Comments

Hina Bokhari writes: In these divided times, the Liberal Democrats must be the voice for fairness and community 

Editor’s Note: In November party members will be voting to elect our next Party President. At Lib Dem Voice we welcome posts from each of the candidates – one to launch their candidature plus a maximum of one per week during the actual campaign.

When marginalised communities around the UK are under constant attack by populists looking for easy solutions to complex problems, it is more important than ever for the Liberal Democrats to champion fairness, openness and community. That’s why I’ll be voting for Josh Babarinde MP to be our next Liberal Democrat President.

I first met Josh when I was standing to be a London Assembly candidate for the party, and one of the key issues we faced in the capital back then – and continue to face today – was knife crime. I wanted to learn more about the work of his social enterprise, Cracked it, and how it was changing the lives of young people across London by employing ex-offenders and at-risk youth to repair smartphones and earn a living. Josh introduced me to a young person who had left prison with little hope and prospect, but whose life had completely changed because of what Cracked it had been able to do for him.

Later, as part of my campaign, Josh joined an event I’d organised at the Islington Youth Centre and introduced me to mums whose sons had died because of knife crime. Not only did examples like these fill me with admiration for Josh and his sense of community, but it deeply influenced my own political thinking and the importance I place on driving change for young people in the capital.

As a national party, it is vital for us to better understand the wide range of communities that we represent – whether in Westminster, Cardiff, Holyrood or in local councils up and down the country. For my part, I have tried to foster a stronger connection between the Liberal Democrats and the Muslim community of which I am a member. And I’m so grateful for the support that Josh has given me as I embarked on that mission – yet another example of how focused he is on championing our core values.

As an example, back during the pandemic, I organised the first ever Lib Dem Iftar. I intended it to be a very practical way for the party to take part in a really significant moment in the Muslim faith calendar, and in doing so learn more about this community and deepen our connection.

The plan was for non-Muslim party members to fast for a day during the month of Ramadan, and Josh jumped at the opportunity to take part. He woke up early to have his first meal before sunrise, and did a full fast for the rest of the day, before joining an online get-together where we broke our fast together with all the usual treats like dates. Speaking to Josh afterwards, he reflected how taking part in this helps you understand your privileges and how easy it is to take them for granted. The ability to come back to a warm home and a hot meal on the table is not something that everyone in our communities can count on.

Tagged , , and | Leave a comment

Mathew meets: Carl Cashman Part 3 – A Lib Dem vision for Liverpool

Mathew Hulbert and Carl Cashman resplendent in yellow

This is the final part of my interview with Liverpool Lib Dem Council group leader Carl Cashman. In this instalment, we talk about the sort of city he wants to see.

So what is the Carl Cashman vision for Liverpool?

One of the first things I want to do is get the Council in the service of people and when you’ve got Labour Councillors saying ‘shouldn’t we move to four weekly bin collections’ that’s a Council that’s out of touch with people and for me if you go round Liverpool, it’s the most beautiful city in the world, but it’s a very dirty city at the moment, it’s very litter ridden city, because the Council aren’t getting the basics right and for me it’s about giving people a real voice over their community, making sure that we tidy up the city and make it a city to be proud of.

He wants to build Council houses:

I want to give people that security in their tenancy again. I want people to have a house for life. I want people to not have to worry about if they’re going to get evicted from one week to the next and I actually want to create communities in Liverpool again.

At the moment we’ve got really big issues with companies like Serco that we’ve got to deal with and we’re not dealing with and I think that’s because Labour haven’t got the guts to do it. I think it takes someone to come in and say one how do we solve the homelessness problem because it is a bad one and two how do we get the temporary accommodation list down and three how do we build Council houses.

The perception people like Boris Johnson and others have tried to create about Liverpool is as one with a sense of victimhood, but Carl rejects that.

I think it’s a city that has got an inherent sense of social justice, more than any other place that I know and it’s an understanding that if the little person’s being picked on we don’t like that. So maybe we call that out a little bit more than other people do. (The city’s been through a lot) we’ve had Hillsborough and several other things where the city’s had to come together and one thing about Liverpool is we always do come together in those situations.

Tragically Reform are on the rise seemingly everywhere, could that possibly include Liverpool?

Tagged , and | Leave a comment

Why the Welsh Lib Dems must confront Reform on Ukraine

Wales has shown the world what solidarity looks like. We became a Nation of Sanctuary, opened our homes to thousands of Ukrainian refugees, and stood firmly on the side of democracy and the rule of law. Yet at the same time, Reform UK, the party now desperate to present itself as the Voice of Wales, was long represented by Nathan Gill, a former Brexit Party and Reform UK politician who pleaded guilty to eight counts of bribery payments in return for pro-Russian statements.

This is not some abstract Westminster scandal, but one too close to home, in Wales. It strikes at the heart of our national security and our values. If Reform UK cannot even keep Russian influence out of its own ranks, why should the people of Wales trust them with our future?

And speaking of Reform UK, let’s take a look at its leader, Nigel Farage, a man who has been consistent with his defence of Putin’s illegal expansionist war in Ukraine. In a BBC Panorama interview, Mr Farage claimed that the West provoked Russia to attack Ukraine with “the ever-eastward expansion of NATO and the European Union“, despite these two institutions operating on a democratic basis; countries only join because they want to, not because they’re forced.

Mr Farage has also previously called on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to seek a peace deal with Russia, despite most of the democratic world, Ukraine included, calling on Russia to end its illegal expansionist war, respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and pull all of its troops out immediately.

While Reform UK flirts with Kremlin narratives, the Liberal Democrats have been absolutely clear: Ukraine’s fight is our fight. It is a fight for democracy, international law and the security of Europe.

From the outset, the Liberal Democrats have consistently:

Tagged , , , and | 10 Comments

Challenges for youth campaigners against authoritarian regime: from today’s Georgia to yesterday’s Hong Kong umbrella revolution

Democracy movements are getting younger. But youthful energy alone isn’t enough. Movements for freedom can be hijacked by malign influence or twisted into populist causes. The real challenge is keeping them liberal, disciplined, and resilient.

Take Georgia. With intensifying demonstrations from Presidential elections to local elections earlier this month. The ruling Georgian Dream party — aligned with Moscow — was accused of manipulating the process, prompting opposition parties to call for a boycott and mass protests in Tbilisi.

While the protests unfolded, the Atlantic Council (23 October 2024) published a report detailing Russia’s interference in Georgian society. The findings were alarming because the Kremlin’s methods closely mirror what happened in Hong Kong between 2014 and 2020.

Russia’s playbook begins with hijacking narratives through targeted misinformation. These campaigns are not just broad — they are personal. Democracy leaders are singled out with lies, threats, and psychological pressure. Moscow’s intelligence networks, including the SVR, push the familiar “foreign invasion” line — claiming that Western powers are orchestrating coups to topple so-called “legitimate” pro-Russian governments.

Tagged and | Leave a comment

Mathew on Monday: How do we respond to the Polanski Green surge?

Folks, before I get into the thrust of my main item this week, a few readers got very hot under the collar in the comments section beneath last week’s column. So, if you’ll allow me, a few points.

Firstly, I now gather that the Lib Dem reshuffle was not triggered by Josh Babarinde stepping back from the front bench and had, in fact, been planned for a while. Happy to correct that.

Secondly, when I said I’d prefer just thirty Lib Dem MPs who were unashamedly liberal than scores more who sometimes appear very tentative, I was making a rhetorical point, of …

Tagged , , and | 38 Comments

The Political Opportunity of UK Industrial Policy

The Starmer Government appears desperate for economic growth, positioning it, almost Chinese style, as a source of political legitimacy.

Where does economic growth come from ? What policy tools are used around the world to achieve it ?

In the UK political parties tend to focus on fiscal policy or macroeconomics; both more of a facilitator (or a hindrance?) than generator of growth.

Beyond that, the left of centre, when not criticising growth per se, tend to focus on ‘industrial policy/strategy’ by which they usually mean interventionist state subsidy (ie ‘picking winners’) , full/partial state ownership (ie ‘partnerships’) , ‘more regulation’, or protectionism.

The right of centre, by contrast tend to focus in theory, though not always in practise, on the functioning of markets; typically expressed from the perspective of arms-length passive investors interested in purchasing assets, private or state. The right often assume that a focus on markets necessitates a reduction in the quantity of economic regulation, however that might be measured, rather than de-monopolisation.

Tagged | 15 Comments

Kosovo Election preview

View of PristinaToday, Kosovo returns to the polls in local elections that carry outsized symbolic weight, especially in the capital Pristina. Across 38 municipalities, voters will elect mayors and municipal assemblies – a ritual of grassroots democracy that also doubles as a referendum on national parties and their grip on power. 

Kosovo gained independence after decades of tension under Serbia, a brutal war in 1998 – 1999 , a decade of UN administration and finally a unilateral Declaration of Independence in 2008 – which whilst wildly recognised by most Western States including  UK, France, Germany, USA and most EU countries – still has Serbia, backed  by Russia, China and some EU countries( Spain, Greece, Slovakia, Romania and Cyprus) refusing to recognise Kosovo as an independent country. 

When I visited Pristina in December  year I found a delightful little town –  somewhat surprised to have been designated a  capital of its country –   with lots  of cafes and restaurants – its architecture a mixture between stark brutalist communist era buildings  to reminders  of its. Ottoman  past, with its people preparing to celebrate Christmas in a predominantly Albanian Muslim country.  

Once Kosovo’s dominant political force, the Lib Dems sister party, PDK,  is hoping in this weekend’s elections to reclaim relevance and authority – particularly in Pristina where the mayoralty has eluded it for years.  PDK traces its origins to the political wing of the Kosovo Liberation Army, and indeed during my stay,  I enjoyed a fascinating lunch with a group of   freedom fighters listening to their stories of the War from the late 1990s. In Parliamentary elections in February, PDK placed second with about 22% of the vote – far behind Prime Minister Albion Kurti’s VV Party, but ahead of the traditional centrist LDK party.  However, seven months later, a parliamentary majority has still to be formed.  After 56 attempts, parties in the Kosovo Assembly finally managed to agree on a Speaker and this  Friday, 2 days before the local elections, the Assembly was finally constituted. 

Tagged and | 3 Comments

Mathew meets…Carl Cashman Part 2: My Lib Dem life

Mathew Hulbert and Carl Cashman resplendent in yellow

In this second part of my interview with Liverpool’s Lib Dem Council Group leader Cllr Carl Cashman, we look at how he got interested in the party and his political philosophy.

I asked him why the Lib Dems?

Fundamentally I’m a Liberal and quite a lot of people forget that in this day and age and they align themselves with a party because of the colour tie they get to where or it’s going to do well or because they think that’s the party for the working class or that’s the party for business and ultimately I think Liberalism is about giving people the tools to make their life the best life that it can possibly be.

So I believe strongly that if you allow people to flourish, give them the conditions to do so that they will flourish and the difference for me between the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives and Labour Party is there’s that horseshoe of control isn’t there? Where the Labour Party wants to control the use of public assets, the Conservative Party wants all control to go to private companies and there’s a middle space of Liberalism where actually people should control the assets that are in society which is why I’m a huge proponent of mutual and cooperatives.

But Carl doesn’t identify as a Social Liberal or an Orange Booker.

When people talk about Left and Right I say Liberalism is its own distinct ideology and I reject those ideas of Left and Right. I call myself a Liberal and I call myself a progressive because I think society gets better when you make progress and I think you can make progress by being socially liberal and also being economically liberal so in the sense of setting businesses free, so ensuring businesses aren’t paying ridiculously high taxes like they are now but also setting people free. So giving people the education that they need to flourish. Giving people the housing they need to flourish. I think those two things are compatible and are compatible with Liberalism.

Carl has no truck with the Labour Party, his main opponents in the city.

My job is to fight the Conservatives (as a progressive) but also to replace the Labour Party because they aren’t a progressive party.

For me it’s about establishing an identity and I think the Lib Dems struggle with that sometimes. One because were too fair minded in many ways because were Liberals and two because were not wanting to upset people who might have lent us their votes and on many occasions we build that track record around the person and that’s vital but we’ve also got to please some very tender coalitions at times of people who’ve voted for us.

So that perhaps explains why our leadership seem to be running scared of Tory voters and afraid of upsetting the horses, now I understand. I disagree with it, but I understand it.

I’ve been the first person to raise concerns when I’ve seen some of our people talking about certain policies because they’re from a certain area and I say well this certainly isn’t going to go down well in Liverpool.

First and foremost, and this is a question Mathew that I think everyone needs to ask themselves when they’re going in to politics, who do you serve? For me there’s three different things; your party, your place, and the organisation so the Council etc. For me it’s quite clear that it’s first the place where I live that’s Liverpool, then it’s the party, then it’s the institution and I think we’ve got to be really careful to remember that.

So what qualities does Carl think he brings as a leader?

Tagged , and | 2 Comments

Tom Arms’ World Review

To lose one prime minister is considered careless. To lose two is incompetence. Three is starting to look like a crisis of leadership. Five in two years is beyond comprehension.

Such is the sad tale of French president Emmanuel Macron as Sebastien Lecornu leaves the Hotel Matignon even before he has a chance to deliver his inaugural address to the National Assembly.

The root of Macron’s evils is, of course, money. But it is further complicated by the thirst for power by France’s far left and far right and the president’s inability to communicate the necessity of living within one’s means.

France desperately needs a budget which reduces its burgeoning debt burden. The country is Europe’s biggest spender relative to its economic output. Its debt burden is just behind the financial disasters that are Greece and Italy. The markets are so concerned about instability that they are increasing the interest which only pushes the debt burden higher.

Raising taxes to make ends meet appears to be out of the question as the tax burden at 45.6 percent of GDP is the highest in Europe.

A step towards balanced books was made in 2023 when Macron pushed through the National Assembly a gradual seven year rise in the pension age from 62 to 64. This, however, looks like it might have to be at least partially sacrificed in order to push through a total budget package by the end of the year deadline.

Meanwhile, Marine Le Pen of the far-right National Rally and a coalition of left-wing parties are refusing to allow ANY budget to pass. They smell the opportunity of forcing a snap election which could result in their winning more seats and possibly forcing Macron out of the Elysee Palace before the next scheduled presidential elections in 2027.

Macron is equally determined to avoid an election. The result of the snap election he called in 2024 was a disaster for the president’s Renaissance Party. The result is that Macron has become toxic within his own party.

His approval ratings are a dismal 14 percent and two of his previous prime ministers—Edouard Phippe and Gabriel Attal—have distanced themselves from their supposed leader.

Germany’s far-right AfD party has a dilemma. It is pro-Russian. It is also anti-Ukraine and anti the war in Ukraine.

At the same time it is pro-jobs because the eastern third of the country (the former East Germany) is starved of industry. That is why it has become a political stronghold for the populist party. Desperate people turn to desperate politics.

The centre-right government of Friedrich Merz has an answer: base a large portion of the new defense industries needed to provision the Ukrainians in the AfD strongholds in the East.

One is already being established in the town of Gorlitz in Saxony on the German-Polish border. The former Alsom plan manufactured railway carriages for 178 years. But over the past ten years it has been sliding into bankruptcy and threatening to further inflate the town’s 9.8 percent unemployment level.

A major proportion of the workforce at the railway manufacturers was skilled welders. Welding is a well-paid trade and welders are needed to make tanks. The result is that the former railway carriages factory is being converted into a tank production centre and jobs are being saved.

Other defense plants are being considered elsewhere in the East in Grobenhain, Thuringia and Brandenburg.

AfD politicians are reluctantly supporting the job creations while at the same time deploring the end product of the jobs created. They must also be concerned that satisfied workers will be less inclined to support extremist political solutions.

China’s Xi Jinping is preparing for his meeting with Donald Trump later this month by tightening export controls on rare earth mineral exports.

Tagged , , and | 6 Comments

Mathew meets…..Carl Cashman Part 1: the early years

Mathew Hulbert and Carl Cashman resplendent in yellowA working class, northern, Council group leader, with a Liverpudlian accent is not exactly a description of your average Liberal Democrat.

Which is exactly why I wanted to conduct the first long form interview with our party’s leader in Liverpool, the man dubbed by the national press as ‘the sexiest politician in Britain,’ Councillor Carl Cashman.

So recently I caught the train up to the great city of Liverpool and spent a few hours with Carl.

I ask him about his vision for the city should he become City Council leader in 2027, his thoughts on the Coalition Government, where he stands ideologically in the Lib Dems, if he’ll run for Parliament, what the party must do better; the attention he gets for his looks, and more.

I hope you enjoy this insight to the man who, for my money, is just about the most interesting personality in the Lib Dems at present.

I began by asking about his background.

When I was younger I grew up in a council house, which is an upbringing that I was really fortunate (to have). I know some people might look down on that kind of upbringing but I absolutely cherished being in a council house and being brought up by my gran and granddad who gave me the morals I’ve got today.

So I’m really appreciative of that upbringing. Even though it wasn’t that we had a lot of money. Quite often gran and granddad would have a bag of chips and that would be tea. I don’t look back at that and think there was anything wrong with that. I look back on that quite fondly. That shaped me as a person.

Tagged , and | Leave a comment

Liberalism: the ideas that built the Liberal Democrats

The Liberal Democrat History Group’s fringe meeting at conference featured a fascinating discussion of the historical roots and present meaning of Liberalism. You can catch up on the meeting, which included talks from Professor Jon Parry (author of Liberalism (Agenda Publishing, 2025)) and David Howarth, the former Lib Dem MP for Cambridge, here on the History Group website.

The meeting also launched our new booklet, Liberalism: the ideas that built the Liberal Democrats, an accessible guide to the key ideas underlying Liberal Democrat beliefs. The booklet opens with an introduction describing the six themes underlying British political Liberalism: liberty, equality, community, democracy, internationalism and environmentalism. It explores how these themes were expressed by different groups and in different contexts throughout the last three hundred years and more of Liberal history.

This includes sections on the three groups of MPs who joined together to form the Liberal Party in 1859. The Whigs first emerged in the late seventeenth century in resistance to the threat of royal absolutism, and came to assert the role of the aristocracy as the natural champions of popular liberties, and as the leaders of movements for political and religious reform. Radical activists in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries were diverse in their politics and aims, but were unified in their pursuit of rights and justice for ordinary people. The Peelites, followers of Sir Robert Peel, who split the Conservative Party over the repeal of the Corn Laws, bequeathed a distinctive philosophical flavour to the Liberal Party; not only free traders, they also advocated peace, financial responsibility and steady, non-revolutionary, reform. 

The next section recalls Liberal support for free trade, the removal of barriers to international trade in goods and services, which played an important part in British politics in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. For much of its life, the fortunes of the Liberal Party were closely tied to the strength of popular feeling for free trade. 

Tagged and | 6 Comments

One Nation Liberalism: reclaiming compassion without conservatism

When our leader, Ed Davey, invited One Nation Conservatives to join the Liberal Democrats, he tapped into something important: the collapse of moderate conservatism and the hunger for decency in politics. Yet, this appeal has left some party members, myself included, uneasy. There is a fear that in trying to welcome disillusioned Conservatives, we risk softening our liberalism into a kind of managerial centrism, one that mistakes moderation for vision.

However, the truth is that Britain doesn’t need a return to One Nation Conservatism. It needs to rediscover One Nation Liberalism.

The phrase “One Nation” has always carried emotional power in British politics. When Disraeli wrote of a nation divided into “two nations”, one rich and one poor, he captured an anxiety that has never truly disappeared. Chimneys and factory gates no longer separate those two nations, but housing markets, regional inequities, and access to opportunity. The same fiscal fissures that alarmed Disraeli still scar Britain today, but the solutions no longer lie in patriotism from above. They lie in liberalism from below; building a society of free citizens bound by mutual respect, fairness, and opportunity.

Liberals have always been the true heirs to the One Nation tradition. Our philosophy is based on the belief that liberty is not merely the absence of restraint, but the presence of opportunity. The New Liberals of the early twentieth century understood this well. T. H. Green, L. T. Hobhouse, and John Hobson argued that freedom was meaningless if poverty, ignorance, or ill-health prevented people from exercising it. For them, liberty was social as much as political.

Tagged , and | 13 Comments

What is FIRC and what does it do?

As we enter into our Federal elections, I though it might be helpful for voters to better  understand what the Federal International Relations Committee (FIRC) actually does and how it fits into the Federal Committee structure. 

The Federal International Relations Committee (FIRC) plays an important role in the Liberal Democrats, a political party proud to have internationalism as one of its core values. It is the body within our party  responsible for shaping and overseeing the party’s international and foreign affairs policy.The eight elected members ensure that the voice of  party members and their  priorities are heard, respected and taken into account when  defining  our foreign policy. FIRC attempts to make our international work relevant to other activities of the party  in local government and elsewhere. 

Reporting to the party’s Federal Board and Autumn Conference , the committee provides strategic guidance on global issues and ensures the Liberal Democrats maintain a clear, liberal voice in international debates both in the UK and on the wider global stage.

FIRC’s role covers several key areas:

Tagged | 1 Comment

Forget the culture wars – economics is the battlefield

I share the concerns of friends in the party about the rise of racism, nationalism and xenophobia in our increasingly illiberal world. The so-called “war on woke” is just code for prejudice against everything diverse, personal and self-expressive.

But as much as I fear we are heading down an all-too-familiar road towards fascism, I don’t believe the progressive response to the far right in this country is working. Too often we react with condemnation — important though that is — without tackling the economic conditions that allow prejudice to thrive in the first place.

Intolerance feeds on economic inequality and financial insecurity. It is always present, but its rise as the dominant malignancy in the political ecosystem often coincides with periods of economic stress. 

The parallels with the 1930s are stark. Then, economic collapse created fertile ground for fascism, with the gutter press fanning the flames. Today, we feel the economy crumbling around us, which once again is generating anxiety and anger, and it’s the social media algorithms that are fanning the flames. Technology may change, but people remain the same.

The cost-of-living crisis is not new. It has been building for decades, leaving many communities hollowed out and resentful. Brexit, nationalism, anti-refugee protests, and Islamophobia have all been symptoms of that deeper malaise, cynically exploited by those who weaponise social discord.

Tagged , and | 11 Comments

Liberalism — Bare your fangs!

I haven’t been a member of the Liberal Democrats for the last five years — though I remain a registered supporter. But lately, I’ve found myself hovering over the “rejoin” button, watching the party and waiting for the one thing that might pull me back into the fold.

The truth is simple: politics has shifted — and we must shift with it.

Across the country, politics has become louder, sharper, and more emotional. Reform UK has built an entire movement not on competence or compassion, but on conviction. They dominate social media with soundbites, certainty, and swagger — even when they’re bafflingly wrong about our country. Meanwhile, the liberal voice of reason, fairness, and decency too often sounds careful, polite, quiet — and most of all, meek.

That has to change.

The Liberal Democrats have reliably been on the right side of history: from Iraq to the 2008 financial crisis, Brexit to digital ID cards. We have so much more to be proud of — and yet we rarely show it. Too often our rhetoric fails to inspire a movement beyond membership.

This is my plea to the political family I want to come home to: the time has come to bare your fangs.

Reclaiming Patriotism from Populism

It’s time we stopped surrendering patriotism to the nationalists and grifters.

Liberal Democrats can and should proudly own what it means to love this country — not through slogans or scapegoats, but through the values that truly make Britain worth believing in: fairness, compassion, and honesty.

We are patriotic because we believe in human rights — and don’t cast them aside when inconvenient. We defend the rule of law — and don’t flaunt it. We care about the country our children will inherit — and don’t use them as political props.

That is a deeper, truer love of country than any piece of Temu tat zip-tied to a railing can offer.

Being proudly British means standing up for the vulnerable, protecting our environment, welcoming those in need, and calling out corruption wherever it hides. That’s the patriotism liberals should champion — and it’s time we did so with confidence.

Let’s not bite our tongues on our values. If Reform wants to drag us into the mud, then we’re ready to meet them there — but we’ll bring truth, not fear.

Becoming the Natural Opposition to Reform UK

We need to be clear about something: our real ideological rival is not Labour or the Greens — it’s Reform UK.

Labour’s caution and compromise leave a vacuum in the debate about what kind of country we want to be. Their lack of vision and values leaves them a husk — a relic of a political establishment that’s lost its way.

The Greens inspire many, but their message doesn’t always reach beyond their core. Even they now compromise on their values to chase the fleeting trends of social media slacktivism.

The Liberal Democrats can — and should — be the loud, unapologetic liberal antidote to populism from both left and right.

Reform UK offers anger. We should offer hope with backbone.

They shout about betrayal; we should shout about belonging.

They trade in fear; we should trade in freedom.

That’s how we position ourselves not as the quiet third choice, but as the party standing tall against the politics of division — the tide that lifts all boats.

Supercharging the Movement

Tagged , and | 10 Comments

Ed Davey invites “one nation” Tories to join Lib Dems

As Kemi Badenoch frightened a lot of progressive horses with her plans to get rid of the Climate Change Act, leave the European Convention on Human Rights, put the Human Rights Act on a bonfire and be even more vile to asylum seekers and immigrants, Ed Davey invited “one nation” Conservatives to join the Liberal Democrats.

Certainly a lot of moderate Conservatives will be disgusted with Robert Jenrick’s full mask-off racism and his attack on the judiciary.

In an open letter to those who feel that the Conservative Party has speeded away from them, he said:

Dear friends,

Our country is at a crossroads.

The Conservative Party under Kemi Badenoch is becoming more extreme and out of touch, chasing Nigel Farage instead of focusing on the issues that really matter to people. Meanwhile, Reform UK is growing in strength – threatening the tolerant, decent values that hold our communities together.

I know many One Nation Conservatives are deeply concerned about the lurch to the hard right in our country and under Kemi Badenoch’s leadership. Her plans to tear up the Climate Change Act and withdraw from the ECHR show she is abandoning traditional British values of tolerance, decency and the rule of law.

So my message to the millions of One Nation Conservatives who feel let down by their party and reject the divisive politics of Badenoch and Farage is to come and join us. Help us save our country and defend the values we all hold dear.

We will stand strong where others back down. We will not pander to Reform. We will fight to protect our environment, stand up for decency and the rule of law, and stop Trump’s America from becoming Farage’s Britain.

So if you share those values, now is the time to join the Liberal Democrats.

With best wishes,

Ed Davey

The party has also put a poster van near the Conference venue in Manchester.

It is perfectly understandable that he should make this sort of plea during the Conservative Conference. I think that we do need to be a bit cautious about the strategy though.  We need to be careful that the people in or who vote for other parties don’t hear from this messaging that we are a one nation small c conservative party. Because we are not. Nor will we ever be.

We don’t want to stick to the status quo, we want to reform just about everything about how our government operates.

We need to make sure that we emphasise that everyone who believes in the freedom of all to be who they are, human rights, civil liberties saving the planet and reforming the immigration and asylum system to make it decent and humane is welcome in the Liberal Democrats.

Tagged , , , and | 24 Comments

Alex Cole-Hamilton MSP writes: Why I am backing Josh for President 

Alex Cole-Hamilton and Josh Babarinde

 

Editor’s Note: In November party members will be voting to elect our next Party President. At Lib Dem Voice we welcome posts from each of the candidates – one to launch their candidature plus a maximum of one per week during the actual campaign.

As leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, I have my fair share of experience in standing up to populism and nationalism – in whatever form they present. A crucial part of making sure we face down those who seek to divide us is having members and activists who are empowered, supported and listened to: that is one of the reasons why I am backing Josh Babarinde for President.

I’ve seen first hand what happens when individuals are given the tools, knowledge, and confidence to take an active role in their community and build their party – they become the driving force behind positive change. Today, we as a party can sometimes rely far too much on champions going it alone with limited support.

Josh’s plans to grow what’s on offer is something I can get fully behind. I like his plans to work with ALDC, HQ and others to build support for local parties.

I like that Josh can draw on his experience at the School for Social Entrepreneurs where he headed up a national programme of training and support for people driving changes in their communities, as well as his work as Vice Chair of the Racial Diversity Campaign in the party to support his vision.

And I like that he is a doer- such as his work before Parliament setting up an award-winning social enterprise, supporting young people out of crime and gangs and into employment. And when he was a local Councillor and led the campaign to declare a cost of living emergency – the first in the country – in Eastbourne. At the time, it was the busiest Trussel Foodbank in the country, and Josh’s work led to the creation of a £250,0000 cost of living emergency fund.

When members feel that their contributions are valued and that they can directly influence decisions, they are more likely to invest their time and energy. This creates a powerful ripple effect, transforming local residents into engaged community champions who can identify local needs, propose solutions, and mobilise their neighbours. This is often the start of a journey that blossoms into something far greater. Josh understands this – as candidate and then MP for Eastbourne he knows what well supported members can deliver for their communities.

Tagged , , and | Leave a comment

The Tory Party’s new ‘enemy within ‘: why Robert Jenrick’s assault on judiciary independence demands a liberal response

In recent months, Shadow Secretary of State for Justice and Shadow Lord Chancellor Robert Jenrick has launched what appears more like a full-blown political attack on the independence of Britain’s judiciary than a policy critique. What was once thought unthinkable, British politicians casting judges as part of a “deep state conspiracy”, is increasingly being normalised.

This assault is not merely a constitutional quirk. It’s a deliberate populist power play: by undermining faith in the judiciary, Jenrick is supporting a weakening of its executive authority. For Liberal Democrats and all defenders of liberal democracy, this is a moment when constitutional guardianship must become a political act.

This isn’t the first time legal professionals have been attacked by the Tory Party, from Marco Longhi’s attack on “woke lefty lawyers” to Suella Braverman vowing to use her previous position as Home Secretary to bring “crooked immigration lawyers to justice“. While both were equally disgraceful, these were attacks on individual lawyers, rather than the entire judiciary system.

But now, Jenrick has said the quiet part out loud. Holding a peruke, Robert Jenrick spoke at the 2025 Conservative Party conference about how Britain has “a problem”, that he has discovered through his own research, “dozens of judges” having links to open border charities and pressure groups, and have spent their entire careers “fighting to keep illegal migrants in this country”, and compared these judges to a crooked football referee. He ends his tirade by announcing the Conservative Party won’t reform immigration tribunals, but instead, abolish them entirely.

Tagged , , and | 7 Comments

Caring for those with addictions

When we think about caregivers, we often envision family and friends assisting elderly or less mobile loved ones with various health conditions, perhaps taking them to hospital appointments or enjoying an occasional afternoon tea. However, the reality can be somewhat difficult. These most valuable members of our community & society seek no recognition, and the only reward they seek is the knowledge that their loved one is as safe and as well as possible, with every day serving as a testament to love and dedication for all too many in our community, these caregivers are the best of our society and my heroes

I would like to bring to the forefront that society frequently overlooks another crucial aspect of caregiving: caring for those struggling with addiction or mental health issues. This often leads to a significant lack of additional support and options for these caregivers, who find themselves navigating the complex and overwhelming revolving door of a stretched NHS, addiction services (often unconnected to the NHS), and, increasingly, the overloaded & daunting Criminal Justice System. Each day brings with it the uncertainty of what challenges they will face, as well as the associated health issues that burden all caregivers and, in some cases, forced to find a fix for the addiction, out of fear or worry of some sort of withdrawal.

Tagged | 2 Comments

‘The future’s bright’ – be wary of futurology

Embed from Getty Images
The Soviet politburo member stands on a high pedestal above the vast crowd. ‘In the future’ he says ’there will be no hunger. In the future you will be able to eat as much as you wish’; adding  ‘Vast state farms will provide for your needs, and science will bring us new foods’. He waved at the sea of flags.

In Post-War USSR there were continuing food shortages, mostly due to the abolition of ‘politically threatening’ collective farms, in favour of larger state mega-farms. Those new state farms were catastrophically unproductive. ‘Artificial food’ factories stayed experimental.

I heard similar messianic speeches when I worked in an unreformed Belarus in the 1990s for President Lukashenka and Piotr Kapitula. They had a strangely familiar ring… Why tackle the nitty-gritty problems of the agriculture sector when you can paint a picture of a coming nirvana and plenty, subduing the ‘impatient’ masses.

Tagged , and | 8 Comments

Mathew on Monday: is Ed putting some of his MPs ‘in the freezer’?

So you might not have noticed, because to say it was beneath the radar is very much an understatement, but our leader reshuffled his top team last week. I only saw one news outlet cover it, Sky News Online. Of course, it happened during Labour Conference so, as ever, the lobby journalists attention was very much elsewhere. But is it just me or does it appear that our whole strategy as a party can be summed up with the phrase ‘under the radar’?

It was suggested to me by someone senior at Conference that it’s the ‘don’t frighten the horses’ strategy, in other words that if we remain beige and inoffensive and don’t really say anything about, well, anything and the Tories continue to implode we’re bound to take scores more Tory seats… right? I don’t know where to start with how complacent, muddled, and wrong-headed such an alleged strategy is. Even assuming it works, if we get scores of MPs elected on the basis that they don’t really believe in anything, how do they then stick up for liberal principles, like being pro immigration and LGBT+ equality, in Parliament and so on? Am I the only person who would rather we elected say 30 MPs who are clear on their liberal principles and policy positions and then can be full-throated in defending liberal values and minority rights in the chamber and on the media? Is just getting more people elected really what we’re here for…or does it actually matter what they stand for/believe in?

Anyway, back to the reshuffle.

Tagged , and | 10 Comments

Bucking the trend – the Strawberry byelection

Last Thursday, there were seven by-elections but one result stood out from the rest – among six Reform successes, Labour held on in just one seat. I might be a bit biased, being the Lib Dem candidate in that seat, but I have more than a sneaking suspicion that the campaign run by my team, helped keep Reform at bay.

On the face of it, by running a campaign in Strawberry ward in Ellesmere Port, we were on a hiding to nothing. There isn’t a local Lib Dem party, there aren’t enough members. The Lib Dems have never won an election here. We never even field a full slate of candidates at the all out elections. Our best hope is usually to hope that the Greens don’t field a candidate. If they do, we’ll probably come fourth of four which somehow feels worse than third of three. People here are just not used to voting Lib Dem. We did field a candidate in Strawberry at the last election but didn’t run any kind of campaign. Labour won with 972 votes (69%). Our brave candidate got just 95 votes. The ward itself is on the very edge of the town, just as the fields between us and Chester start. It has no social housing, no obvious issues, just nice middle class owner occupiers.

Tagged | 5 Comments

Time to highlight the community pillar

Of the six recognised pillars of Liberalism – liberty, equality, community, democracy, environment, and internationalism – each can wax and wane in prominence depending on the Zeitgeist. When human rights are under attack, liberty should be highlighted. When Britain’s role in the world is centre-stage, internationalism comes to the fore. All six are always important, but there are times when we need to lean into one pillar more than others.

The most crucial pillar of Liberalism as we gear up for elections in 2026 (and every year up to the next general election) will be community. In saying this, I’m fighting hard not to let the agenda be dictated by the populists, but as Roz Savage beautifully put it in her LDV column on 30 September, we have to be tough on Farage but also tough on the causes of Farage. And the erosion of people’s sense of community is a big cause.

It’s easy to forget that, until about 300 years ago, most people in this country never went more than 50 miles from their place of birth in their entire lifetime. They identified with their locality, they sometimes had to defend it from hostile threats from without, and they may have had rituals that bound them together as a geographical community. Therein lay their sense of security.

The modern era of technology, travel and television has blown all that out of the water. We can go to the other side of the globe for a couple of days, we can ‘see’ life in the Antarctic, we can become ‘friends’ with people we’ve never met, and we can have our stag and hen parties in eastern European cities. That has brought social change, and shifting assumptions about what is acceptable to do and say. Which is fine if we’re all in it, but once you get large numbers of people who feel left behind, what security can they grab hold of? If that has been swept away by the forces of progress, resentment builds up.

Tagged and | 7 Comments

A view from a Jewish Lib Dem activist and Zionist

We are reeling from the terrible attack on Jews in Manchester on Yom Kippur. Shocking, but sadly not surprising. Perhaps now politicians should dial down the hyperbole around the Middle East. Words such as “apartheid” and “genocide” shed more heat than light, obscuring rather than clarifying a conflict that demands honesty. The attack brought home the real meaning of “Globalise the Intifada”.

Israel’s government is distinct from Zionism, which is distinct from Jews. Yet most of Britain’s 300,000 Jews feel connected to the world’s only Jewish state, home to half of global Jewry. That is why events in Israel reverberate deeply.

Criticism of Israel’s actions is legitimate, but the Centre-Left’s blanket condemnations weaken us, ceding ground to the Right. We should reflect before using rhetoric that delegitimises the only democracy in the region

Israelis remain traumatised by the October 7th massacre, the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust, and the continued plight of 48 hostages/families. Acknowledgement of that trauma here often fades next to Gazan suffering, portrayed without context. The imbalance encourages anger which is too easily channelled into demonisation of Israel itself.

At the LDFI stand at Party Conference, we faced a difficult environment. We oppose Netanyahu’s coalition and condemn the toll of war on both Gazans and Israelis. But we reject the charge of “genocide” as inaccurate, inflammatory, and often antisemitic in intent. Engaging with it feels like the Brexit “£350m a week” trap: a slogan which shuts down debate.

Israel faces an information war. The use of the word “genocide” long predates October 7th 2023, and it is chosen to delegitimise Israel, not foster peace. Recognition of a Palestinian state without defined borders or democratic institutions does not advance a two-state solution; it seemed intended to punish Israel. Gaza after 2005 was already a de facto Palestinian state but its administration chose endless war, culminating in October 7th, rather than coexistence.

Tagged , , and | 18 Comments

Memes against Moscow: What NAFO taught me about fighting disinformation

In 2022, shortly after Russia’s illegal expansionist invasion of Ukraine, I took to Twitter to keep up with any updates.

One post in particular caught my attention: a Russian ambassador pushing the Kremlin line of “saving persecuted Russians in the Donbas region”. I clicked on the comments, only to find a small group of people with cartoon dogs as their profile pictures, sharing memes mocking Putin and the Russian army. I first thought nothing of it until I saw a follow-up post from the ambassador, in which he said, “You pronounced this nonsense, not me.”

I remember commenting, over and over, until another post of his went up, demanding we stop. We carried on. And then, just like that, he blocked me. Nearly everyone who had commented shared screenshots, showing he had blocked all of us. A bond was created in those posts; a bond that would go on to become “NAFO”, or the North Atlantic Fella Organisation.

I’d like to explain what NAFO is. Simply put, it’s a grassroots network that exists to do two main things:

  1. Counteract disinformation spread by Russia and its allies
  2. Raise money to support Ukrainians

Despite the F in NAFO standing for Fella, it isn’t meant to denote male-only membership. A “Fella” in this case is the name of the small cartoon dog, often associated with the “bonk” meme (for those who don’t know, don’t worry about it.) 

But NAFO’s membership consists of cis men and cis women, trans men and trans women, non-binary and gender non-conforming people. There is no set political allegiance, either. I made many good friends through NAFO, some of which are anarchists, conservatives, Trotskyists, social democrats, and many more who believe in very different ideologies. There was one universal truth that united us all: Ukraine is a sovereign nation who has been invaded, and they need our support.

Tagged and | Leave a comment

Tom Arms’ World Review

Drone wall

The EU heads of government—and the British Prime Minister—have given their go-ahead to establish a “drone wall” on the border with Russia.

The move follows Russian invasions by jet fighters of Estonian, Polish and Romanian air space; a cyber attack which closed Berlin Airport and drone activity which closed Copenhagen and Oslo Airports.

The plan is to deploy a multi-layered “drone wall” to quickly detect, track and destroy Russian drones. A nirvana for anyone who has grown to adulthood with hand attached to a joystick.

Ten allies are providing anti-drone and surveillance support. They include: Poland, the UK, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden and the US. Sweden has loaned “powerful radar systems” and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky said Kyiv was sending a mission to Denmark for joint exercises to provide “Ukrainian experience in drone defence”.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said ahead of the summit that airspace incursions were getting worse and that it was “reasonable to assume the drones are coming from Russia”.

“We are not at war, but we are no longer at peace either. We must do much more for our own security.” .
.
Another flagship project, called Eastern Flank Watch, is aimed at fortifying the EU’s eastern borders by sea, air and land to protect against so-called hybrid warfare, as well as from Russia’s shadow fleet .Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen said the EU would have to collaborate on this with both Nato and Ukraine.

EU leaders will be shown plans for a “road map” aimed at bolstering defences and developing Europe’s defence industries by the end of the decade to produce state-of-the-art military equipment. The plans will then be worked on with Nato before EU leaders meet again later this month.

According to the plans for being “2030-ready”, Europe needs to move now so its capabilities are prepared for “the battlefields of tomorrow”.

One of the core ideas is to increasingly focus on joint procurement. The EU has already backed proposals to raise up to $150 billion on capital markets to help fund defence investment. The UK and Canada are likely to take part in the fund.

Democrats’ shutdown gamble

Leave a comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Kira, The words you quoted were from Peter Davies'. Not me. I wouldn't agree with raising VAT on energy to 15% right now. I'd leave it as is. The point ...
  • Peter Martin
    “‘why can’t social care and NHS spending be treated as ‘investment’’. Of course, that wont wash”. I'd agree if were talking about re...
  • Peter Martin
    There's really only two fiscal rules that make any sense: 1) If inflation caused by an overheating economy is the main issue, then governments should tax mor...
  • Peter Davies
    @Kira Collins You seem to have missed the bit about raising tax allowances. That primarily helps those on low wages....
  • David Wright
    According to this well-argued article (by Lib Dem councillor Mark Ellis), a simple wealth tax wouldn't work, but tax on TRANSFER of wealth could, if current tax...