In her Scotsman column, Christine Jardine describes the pain of losing her husband during the election campaign in 2017 – which was then added to by attacks from internet trolls:
Two years ago, at the most difficult time in my personal life, a political activist who thought they were clever decided it was OK to launch a nasty, and untrue attack.
During the 2017 general election campaign, my husband had died from a sudden and unpredicted heart attack.
The circumstances were particularly difficult. We were separated, he was living on his own and, because my name on his list of next of kin was different from his, the police opted for the other person whose name was the same.
It was my daughter who took the call.
The next few days were a blizzard of emotional conversations until we received the results of a post-mortem which detailed how sudden and irretrievable his attack had been.
There were newspaper stories and obituaries to read from journalists and a media he had worked in for 30 years and who were keen to show their respect.
I struggled with the inevitable questions that come from a loved one’s death, exacerbated in this case by the guilt that came from decisions that had set us on different paths after 30 years together.
On the evening of the funeral, the attacks started:
I discovered I was accused on Twitter of breaking the cross-party agreement not to campaign as a mark of respect to the Manchester bombing.
At first I thought it was a mistake, and explained I had been at what I described as “a family funeral”.
Internet trolls started vying to see who could be nastiest about me, while others piled in to try and defend and one or two did send me an apology.
Next day it was all over the papers. There were demands for an apology aimed at the political party whose activist had started it all.
And at the centre of it all my daughter, who was trying to deal with the death of the father she adored, was now dealing with a vicious attack on her mother.
So what’s the way out of all of this?